Moderator: Community Team
This may be useful info. Was the cure some sort of endgame? Or does it imply that there are more nonhumans out there that could have been cured?Mr. Squirrel wrote:Safariguy was too busy working on "the cure" and bulletproof vests to do many investigations. I think he only did one, but I will have to go back and check. I was his mason so this is why I know.Haggis_McMutton wrote: Anyone know all the results that Iliad and the JOATs got?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
So it was ultimately useless from a gameplay standpoint. hmmm...Commander9 wrote:Since this will not change anything, I will say that he actually wasn't working on the cure - he was just researching the background of the Apocalypse: what, how and when happened and what (who) was responsible. Cure would have been the next stage.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Sounds like Phase 2 was useful. Phase 1, could have given you flavor stuff, like say alignment of the gigglers, or either of the churches.Mr. Squirrel wrote:So it was ultimately useless from a gameplay standpoint. hmmm...Commander9 wrote:Since this will not change anything, I will say that he actually wasn't working on the cure - he was just researching the background of the Apocalypse: what, how and when happened and what (who) was responsible. Cure would have been the next stage.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
This. Phase #1 had a really nice story and twist in it, but game wise, it was worthless. Phase 2, on the other hand, would have done something significant.edocsil wrote:Sounds like Phase 2 was useful. Phase 1, could have given you flavor stuff, like say alignment of the gigglers, or either of the churches.
Well la-ti-dah. Guess not.Commander9 wrote:This. Phase #1 had a really nice story and twist in it, but game wise, it was worthless. Phase 2, on the other hand, would have done something significant.edocsil wrote:Sounds like Phase 2 was useful. Phase 1, could have given you flavor stuff, like say alignment of the gigglers, or either of the churches.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
sorry meant squirrel. Was thinking of Tails for my forum game, meant to type squirrel. I investigated squirrel and got back that he's reliable but I saw him doing strange rituals. Thats all I got, no alignment or other information. That makes me throw doubt on his claim as a Swat officer.naxus wrote:Vote Tailz
Whatd you do last night tails?
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Are you skimming? Squirrell already claimed the kill on Vio last night. Safari confirmed his claim, and his death showed he wasn't lying...naxus wrote:sorry meant squirrel. Was thinking of Tails for my forum game, meant to type squirrel. I investigated squirrel and got back that he's reliable but I saw him doing strange rituals. Thats all I got, no alignment or other information. That makes me throw doubt on his claim as a Swat officer.naxus wrote:Vote Tailz
Whatd you do last night tails?
unvote tails(cause im an idiot) vote squirell
I'm aware of that but I'm going off the information I got. I could be getting wrong or misleading investigations but what strange rituals would a SWAT officer do?Streaker wrote:Are you skimming? Squirrell already claimed the kill on Vio last night. Safari confirmed his claim, and his death showed he wasn't lying...naxus wrote:sorry meant squirrel. Was thinking of Tails for my forum game, meant to type squirrel. I investigated squirrel and got back that he's reliable but I saw him doing strange rituals. Thats all I got, no alignment or other information. That makes me throw doubt on his claim as a Swat officer.naxus wrote:Vote Tailz
Whatd you do last night tails?
unvote tails(cause im an idiot) vote squirell
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Tbh, I have absolutely no idea...naxus wrote:I'm aware of that but I'm going off the information I got. I could be getting wrong or misleading investigations but what strange rituals would a SWAT officer do?Streaker wrote:Are you skimming? Squirrell already claimed the kill on Vio last night. Safari confirmed his claim, and his death showed he wasn't lying...naxus wrote:sorry meant squirrel. Was thinking of Tails for my forum game, meant to type squirrel. I investigated squirrel and got back that he's reliable but I saw him doing strange rituals. Thats all I got, no alignment or other information. That makes me throw doubt on his claim as a Swat officer.naxus wrote:Vote Tailz
Whatd you do last night tails?
unvote tails(cause im an idiot) vote squirell
Also Safari could've been given misleading information regarding squirrel.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Interesting. I like this theory, seems to account for a lot of the going ons.Iliad wrote:Alright. I wanted to make this case last day, but it was far too close to the deadline to change the result, only to perhaps achieve a no lynch, and it only would have made me a target. Squirrel's night kill abilities only confirm this.
Streaker's claim does not hold up. It's far too circumstantial and convenient. Also, if he was enlightening people why on earth would that message be linked back to him, instead of being anonymous. Why would one of the enlightened players defend him vigorously, since if it was about enlightenment tthey had no more use for him. Fourthly this game is filled with offensive roles, rather than defensive. Fifthly look at all the flavour the blurbs about science versus religion which seems to imply rival cults rather than innoculations.
Streaker is at the head of the atheistic cult, and we know for sure that he has already recruited Squirrel. Notice their actions. Although they have been going for non-town roles they have been going for only other religious roles such as vio and now tailguner. An outed cultie isn't a threat by himself, since we can lynch or vig him at any point if we do believe that he is lying. The atheist cult however seems to be quite strong.
Let's look at the other non-town factions for now.
Mafia-led by stephen Hawking
Had a charmer and a guard, though not sure what either of those roles do exactly. A guard is probably some kind of doc or roleblocker, and a charmer probably roleblocks or redirects actions.
Not sure what connects the three of those characters at all. At least one more member- the godfather, left but there might be another.
Christian cult-
Cult leader killed night 2. A single christian is out there as implied by the night 2 scene, unlikely but possibly to be two.
Scientologist cult
Cult leader killed night 5. Up to 4 members out there, but that seems unlikely.
Atheist cult- seems quite probable but not confirmed like the others yet.
Abomination- doesn't seem to have recruiting powers, probably just an sk.
Werewolf-killed off early. Herk wasn't aware of his own condition. I was afraid he might have spread the disease earlier but that doesn't seem to have happened.
Naxus's investigation shows a few things. Firstly notice streaker's defense of him, confirming the fact that they are now on the same team. Secondly it shows that his information about us is likely to be false and we do lynch all liars.
So-do we lynch streaker the probable leader of the cult or squirrel, the cultie with night kill abilities?
naxus wrote:sorry meant squirrel. Was thinking of Tails for my forum game, meant to type squirrel. I investigated squirrel and got back that he's reliable but I saw him doing strange rituals. Thats all I got, no alignment or other information. That makes me throw doubt on his claim as a Swat officer.naxus wrote:Vote Tailz
Whatd you do last night tails?
unvote tails(cause im an idiot) vote squirell
Why would your main goal not be mafia? If you believe that the leaders of the only 2 cults have been killed, your main goal should actually be getting mafia. DO you have alternate win conditions that you're not sharing with the rest of the class?Streaker wrote: My main target may not be mafia, but our winning goal is still eliminating ALL threats to town. Cults are a part of that, so I'll stick to my flavour.
So your theory is that naxus is a flavour cop, who can find out when a mason has lost his partner?Streaker wrote: Yes, my target of the night was Safari. The part where Squirell is in the scene does make sense, as they are masoned. As far as the ritual goes, we can only guess. He lost his mason, maybe it's part of the flavour when that happens.
Ah, so he goes against a cult. Let's see who would have interest to do that? Town ... check. Mafia ... check. Other cults ... check. Well, doesn't that prove a lot?Streaker wrote: Why did I defend Squirell at the beginning of the Day? Easy.
Naxus has information about Squirell being reliable, yet votes him. Squirell also made a valid claim about having a night kill, as he proved this night. Also notice how he doesn't kill townies? Instead, he aimed for what he believes is a threat to town. Yet naxus votes him.
Why wouldn't I defend him? Naxus is going after a powerfull (albeit less powerfull with the loss of safari) role, and you guys just let it happen?
I can't believe Naxus actually votes him, it casts serious doubts on him.
This isn't a townie defending another townie. Naxus presents info on the cult thing, yet you act like he acts against a person whom is 100% to be trusted.Streaker wrote: Are you skimming? Squirrell already claimed the kill on Vio last night. Safari confirmed his claim, and his death showed he wasn't lying...
You do realize that a survivor ... is third party, right?Streaker wrote: TG is also an interesting player. He admits to being third party. We have no way of knowing he is in fact the last of his cult. He SAYS he will play it like survivor, while in fact he IS third party. I also don't believe commander would let an entire cult die, when there is at least 1 more member in it. Or, in this case, have the cult be useless.
Ah, unlike the myriad of players who have done a whole lot till now. I think I might actually have the most posts today.Streaker wrote: Also, my vote remains with Haggis.
Haggis replaces aage, but all in all doesn't do much up until now. The only thing he does is jump on Illiad's case, adding nothing substantial to it.
Heh, you didn't vote for me, mate. You voted for aage. Actually till now I was getting the impression that you're trying to befriend me, guess not so much after I support the very valid case on you.Streaker wrote: I can even see a little OMGUS in it, because I voted him first. It's a good case by Iliad to hide behind though.
I hope this provides decent enough perspective, as Illiad's case is really good.
Silly, a survivor IS 3rd party. And the mod doesn't always get to control the outcome of whatever factions s/he puts in the game. Sometimes a cult recruiter gets NK'ed N1, and that's that. Sometimes that's just how the chips fall, and honestly that's one of the best things about mafia, because it creates opportunity for others. You can't expect a game to go perfectly.Streaker wrote:He SAYS he will play it like survivor, while in fact he IS third party. I also don't believe commander would let an entire cult die, when there is at least 1 more member in it. Or, in this case, have the cult be useless.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
I figured. What is your connection to streaker then. Do you know his real role?Mr. Squirrel wrote:Ok... I spent the past two hours deliberating and I can really think of no way to talking my way out of this. Sorry streak. vote streaker
I will side with town. I'm in the same boat as TG. If you guys have any questions, ask away.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I'm his cult recruit. I hate selling out streak like this, but I don't want to be dragged down as well when there is a chance I could still win and be useful through my town objective. He dug himself a hole and I can't pull him out without getting us both killed. I'm his only recruit. All of his other recruitments failed. Vio was one failure, which was part of the reason why I killed her.edocsil wrote:I figured. What is your connection to streaker then. Do you know his real role?Mr. Squirrel wrote:Ok... I spent the past two hours deliberating and I can really think of no way to talking my way out of this. Sorry streak. vote streaker
I will side with town. I'm in the same boat as TG. If you guys have any questions, ask away.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that