Moderator: Community Team
Bud, I'm not saying you're a bad player, I'm saying that justifying something by saying "that's what I do" is bad. If you crashed your car into someone's house, then said "sorry I was drink-driving but get used to it because that's how I roll, well you'd find yourself locked up pretty quickly. Sorry if it came off as having a go at you personally, and it certainly wasn't intended to start a bragging contest.DoomYoshi wrote:We wouldn't learn anything new. That was more to address Violet's point that we need a lynch. Not that we need to learn more, just that we need to kill someone. I'm sorry if I jump all over the place. I try to address the points as they come up. Sustained case-building doesn't make sense this early on when most of the cases are foggy in any case. You are correct that I did not vote for AoG. That's because I do not think an arbitrary lynch is the way to go.
You call me a bad player: that's fine, I'm not a great player. However, I am undefeated as mafia on this site and your first two posts were using my patented mafia strategy. That is why my vote is on you. That is why it is staying on you. If someone can provide a more reasonable lynch within the deadline I will switch.
Note: I do not actually have a patent on that strategy. You are free to use it, but I will catch you:)


Firstly, sorry if any of your puny human emotions have been smashed.shieldgenerator7 wrote:I feel like you just served us a meal of insults and a desert of summary. I don't see much substance in this post that hasn't been said already. Does the underlined part mean you are not human and possibly robot scum?
EBWOPblakebowling wrote:Vote DoomYoshi. I was hoping I wasn't the only one seeing something weird about him accusing everyone.
prodding or voting for inactives sounds logically, but also scummy in this context. People are voting for you and you're trying to get attention to other people rather than yourself, rather than defending yourself. You're trying to spread people's vote around so we don't have a lynch. Scummy? Maybe. Claiming super townie even as a joke? Maybe a scum-tell... who knows? Sounds suspicious. Unvote Vote DoomYoshiDoomYoshi wrote:In honour of the age old tradition: Don't lynch me, I'm a Super-townie
But seriously, if random lynch it is, why not go for the claimed vanilla townie? Or get an inactive. I am on here night and day trying to keep the convo moving so people can put their scumhunting to good use.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Yes, it's 4th/5th and not 4th/6th as I had said. For that I'm sorry.blakebowling wrote:I voted 4th on Yoshi, and it would be 5th if you didn't count the un-bold one. (shield was 6th).
I don't wish to reveal my role, however if the majority of the town wishes for me to, I will.
I don't see why you're still voting me Rodion, IF it is just because you haven't seen a reason to unvote, I understand.
Actually, Violet is suggesting we kill for the sake of killing. That is evidenced by her post:jeraado wrote:Bud, I'm not saying you're a bad player, I'm saying that justifying something by saying "that's what I do" is bad. If you crashed your car into someone's house, then said "sorry I was drink-driving but get used to it because that's how I roll, well you'd find yourself locked up pretty quickly. Sorry if it came off as having a go at you personally, and it certainly wasn't intended to start a bragging contest.DoomYoshi wrote:We wouldn't learn anything new. That was more to address Violet's point that we need a lynch. Not that we need to learn more, just that we need to kill someone. I'm sorry if I jump all over the place. I try to address the points as they come up. Sustained case-building doesn't make sense this early on when most of the cases are foggy in any case. You are correct that I did not vote for AoG. That's because I do not think an arbitrary lynch is the way to go.
You call me a bad player: that's fine, I'm not a great player. However, I am undefeated as mafia on this site and your first two
posts were using my patented mafia strategy. That is why my vote is on you. That is why it is staying on you. If someone can provide a more reasonable lynch within the deadline I will switch.
Note: I do not actually have a patent on that strategy. You are free to use it, but I will catch you:)
Vio isn't suggesting that we must kill for the sake of killing, she's saying that we've got to keep gathering more information, and if a light lynch is required to do that then so be it. Even if it does down to a lynch due to the deadline, then we can still gain information through who votes and who doesn't, a role-claim, comments leading up to the lynch. These can all be valuable later in the game.
Notice how there is nothing stated about information. Notice how her argument is not "we need more information". Notice how it is "we need a lynch". vote jeraado x2 for skimming. Furthermore, the chance that Violet would be back before the deadline or a lynch is pretty slim. She is very regular in her posting. How could she possibly get any information anyways?VioIet wrote:You have to bold it blake, for the vote to count.
And if the vote count that I have in my head is correct- both blake and yoshi each have 3 votes right now.
Directly split down the middle. My current vote on Tails is from the joke vote stage, and certainly isn't helping us get anywhere so I will Unvote
Blake gave a subtle hint to his role earlier- I don't know if anyone caught it or not. I caught it, and would prefer not to vote for him right now.
Sorry Doom, but we do need a Day 1 lynch.
Vote Doom Yoshi

everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.





blakebowling wrote:Vote Rodion
I investigated him last night, he is guilty.

freezie wrote:blakebowling wrote:Vote Rodion
I investigated him last night, he is guilty.
Sweet![]()
Vote: Rodion
With a bodyguard and a jailkeeper out of the way, however, it's quite likely we have maybe 1, if not none, protection role left..If there is a watcher or tracker, now's the time to be smart.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
My PM from safari had three words. "Radion is guilty" (with guilty in Red). I thought about sanity as well, however with only having 12 people, I highly doubt there are two cops.naxus wrote:freezie wrote:blakebowling wrote:Vote Rodion
I investigated him last night, he is guilty.
Sweet![]()
Vote: Rodion
With a bodyguard and a jailkeeper out of the way, however, it's quite likely we have maybe 1, if not none, protection role left..If there is a watcher or tracker, now's the time to be smart.
Before we immediately kill Rodion, lets try and clear the air a little.
Blake, With your investigation did it come back as "He is guilty" or was there flavor text with it?Also with this being your first investigation and this games theme, your sanity can be thrown into question.But then again the size of the game limits that.
I agree freezie that we need to play smart, and not blindly follow someone without a little bit of info.
FOS Rodion and Blake
naxus wrote:freezie wrote:blakebowling wrote:Vote Rodion
I investigated him last night, he is guilty.
Sweet![]()
Vote: Rodion
With a bodyguard and a jailkeeper out of the way, however, it's quite likely we have maybe 1, if not none, protection role left..If there is a watcher or tracker, now's the time to be smart.
Before we immediately kill Rodion, lets try and clear the air a little.
Blake, With your investigation did it come back as "He is guilty" or was there flavor text with it?Also with this being your first investigation and this games theme, your sanity can be thrown into question.But then again the size of the game limits that.
I agree freezie that we need to play smart, and not blindly follow someone without a little bit of info.
FOS Rodion and Blake

Probably the fakest day 1 affirmation. Blake's one-liner (because writing a lot could lead you into contradicting yourself - has anyone noticed how terse Blake's posts are?) implies that he considered Yoshi to be scummy and was happy that others agreed with him, while, in fact, Blake would have voted on any townie that was close to being lynched (just like he had done with AoG). Blake couldn't be happy by the fact that the "majority" agreed with him on DoomYoshi specifically because it was HIM that "agreed" to the majority in order to get a townie lynched or at least to force a second roleclaim (both things happened, by the way, as Yoshi roleclaimed only to be mistakenly hammered by, of all people, me). Let's not forget that, when day 1 ended, the townie that suspected Blake the most was me. I had, in fact, asked the cop to investigate him right before night 1 started.blakebowling wrote:Vote DoomYoshi. I was hoping I wasn't the only one seeing something weird about him accusing everyone.