eddie2 wrote:blitzaholic in clandemonium with jobiwan![]()
so blitz is in there with himself
Moderator: Community Team
eddie2 wrote:blitzaholic in clandemonium with jobiwan![]()
I work quite a bit, thank you.Rodion wrote:Dividing by zero does not work either.40kguy wrote:IP dosent always work rember? i belive devidedbyzero said this already.Dako wrote:We still have IP issue at hand. How can you explain that? Password leak means some other guy logs in from home acount aiwht another IP. Either somebody messed up from the home PC of commander, or somebody has a real grudge and masked his IP to commanders IP.

Chariot of Fire wrote:General Pinochet, in the basement, with a cattle prod.pearljamrox2 wrote:Colonel Mustard, in the Kitchen......with the candlestick?
If Commander is an 11 year old girl, then Im going to have to remove him from my fantasies or face legal prosecution...pearljamrox2 wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:General Pinochet, in the basement, with a cattle prod.pearljamrox2 wrote:Colonel Mustard, in the Kitchen......with the candlestick?
If Commander was an 11 year old girl, I'd say you were onto something.
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass

what evidence do you base your first statement on? many of his supporters are stating the IP check is wrong or that he is somehow the single member of CC ensnared in a credit card grab against sony users (luckily they only took his password to CC and ruined his account instead of stealing credit card infoCommander9 wrote:While I can't completely rule out the possibility it was him, I am 95% sure that it was not him. Furthermore, judging from his posts, he has shown that he learnt his lesson and I do not believe this should be pursued any further than a "Noted" or "Warned."

he didn't intentionally committed "legal point dumping". you insist to misunderstand this point. he played various games he was not pro at for the purpose of getting medals; that led to losing a lot of points. he didn't meant to lose them.owenshooter wrote:what evidence do you base your first statement on? many of his supporters are stating the IP check is wrong or that he is somehow the single member of CC ensnared in a credit card grab against sony users (luckily they only took his password to CC and ruined his account instead of stealing credit card infoCommander9 wrote:While I can't completely rule out the possibility it was him, I am 95% sure that it was not him. Furthermore, judging from his posts, he has shown that he learnt his lesson and I do not believe this should be pursued any further than a "Noted" or "Warned."![]()
).. if you have something, you should offer it up in the C&A thread to clear this all up... furthermore, it is really hard for me to believe he has "LEARNT" his lesson. had he learned his lesson, he would not have accumulated another 6 months worth of bans due to his continual posting from others accounts, after being warned to cease those actions by team CC!!! throw in the fact that he admitted to "legally point dumping", and it just doesn't look good for him. however, i am sure everyone is really excited to see/hear this new evidence you have that proves he is at least 95% innocent!!! the IP check came back from his computer, period... you can't discredit that, so you can't declare him innocent. and now, any hopes you had of lessening his sentence has probably been ruined by commander himself, by posting from other accounts and admitting pint dumping in the past...-the black jesus
legally point dumping is confusing the issue. He had a high score, went after medalwins, tried a different map and settings and concequently lost a lot of rank. Trying to win is not point dumping. He never before stated he tried not to win. please don't much it up. You know what he said, I know what he said, but bringing it up in your post vlike you did makes it look like he might have done something bad.. at that time.. which proved to be not the case. Considering the inflamatory nature of this thread, please dont add heat and oil..owenshooter wrote: ... throw in the fact that he admitted to "legally point dumping", ....-the black jesus
again, i don't know how you can just dismiss what has accumulated into a 6 month ban as if these actions are also not serious, just like his recent point dump. please explain the IP check coming up as his computer and i'll back off. but to continue to defend him when he is continually breaking CC rules openly is just ridiculous. he point dumped, and now he has broken more rules by posting from other accounts when his account was frozen. if it was not a BIG DEAL, then it would not be against the rules and he would not be looking at 6 months for those actions alone... none of you have offered any evidence to counter the IP check, and commander continues to dig a deeper hole. and rbel, i have had my share of run ins with CC, including a 6 month ban for a made up infraction by an admin for breaking a rule that is not written, has not been written since, and has never been enforced again. guess what, i took it. commander should have provided actual evidence as to how the IP check was wrong or had his friends do so. even if he had accepted CC's IP check, he could have asked for a less severe punishment based on his past actions here (i guess this would not include his self described "legal point dump")... i'm sorry, but the IP check and his actions after the point dump seem to have this all sealed up. now i eagerly await more of his friends to come post about how great he is and that there is no way he could have done it, and that they will vouch for him and CC should not punish him harshly...rbelgrod wrote:come on owen , go smoke some weed and chill out please.....yes he used his friends accounts to post.....they say this is wrong, so let that be what it is....so what, he did not go on their accounts and do anything other than that....

I believe it was Caesar who said "divide by zero and conquer".dividedbyzero wrote:I work quite a bit, thank you.Rodion wrote:Dividing by zero does not work either.40kguy wrote:IP dosent always work rember? i belive devidedbyzero said this already.Dako wrote:We still have IP issue at hand. How can you explain that? Password leak means some other guy logs in from home acount aiwht another IP. Either somebody messed up from the home PC of commander, or somebody has a real grudge and masked his IP to commanders IP.
Oh you...said dividing. I'm divided.
And a house divided cannot stand. Or something like that.

And those that majorly benefit form dumped points? Shouldn't they also be considered a Special Case Infraction?AndyDufresne wrote:We've recently amended the Point Dumping Infraction:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4#p3153364
--Andy
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Owen you should be banned for pint dumping...what a waste of good alcohol.......owenshooter wrote:what evidence do you base your first statement on? many of his supporters are stating the IP check is wrong or that he is somehow the single member of CC ensnared in a credit card grab against sony users (luckily they only took his password to CC and ruined his account instead of stealing credit card infoCommander9 wrote:While I can't completely rule out the possibility it was him, I am 95% sure that it was not him. Furthermore, judging from his posts, he has shown that he learnt his lesson and I do not believe this should be pursued any further than a "Noted" or "Warned."![]()
).. if you have something, you should offer it up in the C&A thread to clear this all up... furthermore, it is really hard for me to believe he has "LEARNT" his lesson. had he learned his lesson, he would not have accumulated another 6 months worth of bans due to his continual posting from others accounts, after being warned to cease those actions by team CC!!! throw in the fact that he admitted to "legally point dumping", and it just doesn't look good for him. however, i am sure everyone is really excited to see/hear this new evidence you have that proves he is at least 95% innocent!!! the IP check came back from his computer, period... you can't discredit that, so you can't declare him innocent. and now, any hopes you had of lessening his sentence has probably been ruined by commander himself, by posting from other accounts and admitting pint dumping in the past...-the black jesus
This made me come over all peculiar. Such use of English should be treasured.AndyDufresne wrote:Moreover, we still retain the right to issue a point reset upon first Infraction if the user engaged in obvious, egregious and gross abuse of Point Collecting.
--Andy