A moral question about foeing

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Responding to foeing...

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
prior680
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:10 am
Gender: Male
Location: germany
Contact:

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by prior680 »

people who foe others are just ass wipes !!! 8-)
User avatar
Sir_Frag
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:17 pm

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by Sir_Frag »

It's just a game.. everyone chill the f*ck out. I can't believe this thread even exists. Get some sunlight people
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by Timminz »

prior680 wrote:people who foe others are just ass wipes !!! 8-)


Foe'd! How dare you insult me, like that?!
User avatar
jefjef
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by jefjef »

Image

I foe EVERYONE! Bahahahahahahahahahahahaha Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha <cough>
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
BoganGod
Posts: 5873
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:08 am
Gender: Male
Location: Heaven's Gate Retirement Home

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by BoganGod »

jefjef wrote:
tiny wrote:So I've recently been foed by jj. He stuck in my face how I earned a spot in the pile. It troubles me and I don't know what to do. I can't sleep... Please hold me. :cry:


I love how the simple act of being foed causes some people internal torment and moral dilemma.

If I were in this situation I would foe the person - send a profanity laced flaming pm to him and tell all my friend about it. Maybe even get a cat.


Good thread! btw. This is internet. Not rl.


bs jj. you would cry like a little girl without her dummy(pacifer for the seppos(americans), not a derogatory term for intellectually challenged people), wailing at the injustice, searching frantically through your memory for what it was you did. Trying to make things right would consume your every waking moment. Please be honest with the community jefjef.

I think the term foe is BAD. Why not use the word ignore, much more truthful. Nations and tribes have foes.... Not some bespeckled nerd(nothing against those with less than 20/20 vision) sitting at a computer drooling and thinking "I shall foe this vile oxygen thief than he/she/it will be so very, very sorry". Sorry what your really doing is ignoring someone, making them go away so you don't have to read the dysentery draws dribble they write.
Image
premio53
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:09 pm

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by premio53 »

I am amazed at how some people get upset about someone not wanting to play against them. I have probably over 1,000 on my foe list with the overwhelming majority having to do with deadbeats who miss turns on purpose or for some kind of "strategy." There are 20,000 other opponents out there so what difference does it make if someone for whatever reason doesn't wish to engage in a game with you? When I foe someone there isn't anything personal. I simply wish to play someone else. I'm sure I have made someone's foe list but I'll never know because I almost never join games. Regards.
User avatar
Mr_Adams
Posts: 1987
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by Mr_Adams »

Send an envelope full of anthrax?
Image
User avatar
safariguy5
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by safariguy5 »

premio53 wrote:I am amazed at how some people get upset about someone not wanting to play against them. I have probably over 1,000 on my foe list with the overwhelming majority having to do with deadbeats who miss turns on purpose or for some kind of "strategy." There are 20,000 other opponents out there so what difference does it make if someone for whatever reason doesn't wish to engage in a game with you? When I foe someone there isn't anything personal. I simply wish to play someone else. I'm sure I have made someone's foe list but I'll never know because I almost never join games. Regards.

Wait, so if someone doesn't use cheap tactics but plays in a bunch of games with you you'd still foe them?

I've never foed anyone who I see in a lot of games, mainly because there's a lot of players who play tourneys and clan challenges require playing the same person multiple times.
Image
premio53
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:09 pm

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by premio53 »

I have no idea what your question is. Simply put, for awhile it took forever to finish a game because of deadbeats and they seemed to keep joining and missing turns. That's when I established the Premio doctrine. If someone misses turns I don't wish to play them. It's still amusing how upset someone gets if a player wishes not to play them when there are 20,000 other opponents to choose from. Nuff said.
User avatar
Leehar
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Johannesburg
Contact:

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by Leehar »

safariguy5 wrote:
premio53 wrote:I am amazed at how some people get upset about someone not wanting to play against them. I have probably over 1,000 on my foe list with the overwhelming majority having to do with deadbeats who miss turns on purpose or for some kind of "strategy." There are 20,000 other opponents out there so what difference does it make if someone for whatever reason doesn't wish to engage in a game with you? When I foe someone there isn't anything personal. I simply wish to play someone else. I'm sure I have made someone's foe list but I'll never know because I almost never join games. Regards.

Wait, so if someone doesn't use cheap tactics but plays in a bunch of games with you you'd still foe them?

I've never foed anyone who I see in a lot of games, mainly because there's a lot of players who play tourneys and clan challenges require playing the same person multiple times.

Still, clan challenges and tourneys negate foe lists, so thats not really a problem.
[spoiler]#27
Nobody has a higher score or more medals with less games completed ;)
My Dispatch Interview[/spoiler]
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by AndyDufresne »

In regards to the Poll, if a user just seemed to randomly add me to their Foes List, and I've had little contact/game-playing with them, I'd just write them off.

If someone who I had a history with (lots of game history or something like that), I'd be more inclined to send a PM, but I'm not entirely sure I still would.


--Andy
bobdakota
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:29 pm

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by bobdakota »

I was foed by a guy and asked why. He said he was medal hunting and would remove me. We had played a lot of games together. I am still foe and I think it is because I kicked his ass all the time :lol:
User avatar
safariguy5
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by safariguy5 »

premio53 wrote:I have no idea what your question is. Simply put, for awhile it took forever to finish a game because of deadbeats and they seemed to keep joining and missing turns. That's when I established the Premio doctrine. If someone misses turns I don't wish to play them. It's still amusing how upset someone gets if a player wishes not to play them when there are 20,000 other opponents to choose from. Nuff said.

The question is more directed at the underlined portion of the quote, it makes it sound like "you wanting to play someone else" implies the person is active and didn't miss turns. Foe deadbeats by all means, but in public games, if I see the same player in a bunch of my games, I don't foe them so I can play someone else. Sounds like you just foe deadbeats in your public games though, I was confused at the odd wording.
Image
User avatar
KoolBak
Posts: 7302
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
Gender: Male
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by KoolBak »

*sigh*

I foed you S. You were ruining a perfectly lovely thread just to be an ass, period. You don't actually play the game here, so it has nothing to do with your competitive ability....just that you're annoying as hell.

I did it reasonably, just so as to NOT have to read your fooking blather. YOU, however, went on to make many nasty remarks about ME and my preferences, my tastes, my habits and me as a person - just over foeing.

This thread, therefore, is incredibly hypocritical, n'est-ce pas? "Morality"? Really??

I wish the foeing action would axe the quoted foe-ee's posts as well....

And lastly, if by "replying" you mean a PM, then no you shouldn't as I believe the foe-ee's PMs are auto-blocked from the Foe-er's mailbox......

That's all - I'm outaa here...too painful.....must wash.........
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."

Neil Young....Like An Inca

AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by Symmetry »

KoolBak wrote:*sigh*

I foed you S. You were ruining a perfectly lovely thread just to be an ass, period. You don't actually play the game here, so it has nothing to do with your competitive ability....just that you're annoying as hell.

I did it reasonably, just so as to NOT have to read your fooking blather. YOU, however, went on to make many nasty remarks about ME and my preferences, my tastes, my habits and me as a person - just over foeing.

This thread, therefore, is incredibly hypocritical, n'est-ce pas? "Morality"? Really??

I wish the foeing action would axe the quoted foe-ee's posts as well....

And lastly, if by "replying" you mean a PM, then no you shouldn't as I believe the foe-ee's PMs are auto-blocked from the Foe-er's mailbox......

That's all - I'm outaa here...too painful.....must wash.........


I've reset the poll to add your option.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
KoolBak
Posts: 7302
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
Gender: Male
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by KoolBak »

lol....well played =D>
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."

Neil Young....Like An Inca

AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Mageplunka69
Posts: 1164
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: Intercourse Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by Mageplunka69 »

my thoughts are, once your a noob who does stupid moves to sacrifice a game, your foed ....""Foe em all""....♥ôô♥
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by AndyDufresne »

rbelgrod wrote:my thoughts are, once your a noob who does stupid moves to sacrifice a game, your foed ....""Foe em all""....♥ôô♥


"Foe 'em all and let god sort 'em out" ? :D


--Andy
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by OliverFA »

I will foe everybody who dares to win me. That way I'll become the new Conqueror soon :D
Welcoming the long awaited Trench Warfare Setting (Previously Adjacent Attacks).

My Maps:
Research and Conquer - Civilization meets Conquer Club

Best score: 2,346 - Best position: #618 - Best percentile: 4.87%
User avatar
-Maximus-
Posts: 432
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Oklahoma

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by -Maximus- »

I have said this before, but I used to foe everyone under 1000. This made it so I could have the best potential to gain points. Nothing against all those that are on the list, just like to win points when I do win. I dipped below 1000 while playing assdoodles for the medal, maybe some people foed me as well.
If you wrong me I will hunt you down and destroy you.
User avatar
Pirlo
Posts: 1849
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 4:48 pm
Gender: Male

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by Pirlo »

there's an ass who foed me when I disagreed with his narrow minded view in the forum :lol:
User avatar
-Maximus-
Posts: 432
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Oklahoma

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by -Maximus- »

Pirlo wrote:there's an ass who foed me when I disagreed with his narrow minded view in the forum :lol:


Foed*
If you wrong me I will hunt you down and destroy you.
User avatar
Pirlo
Posts: 1849
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 4:48 pm
Gender: Male

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by Pirlo »

-Maximus- wrote:
Pirlo wrote:there's an ass who foed me when I disagreed with his narrow minded view in the forum :lol:


Foed*


what :---)
User avatar
Serbia
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Detroit

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by Serbia »

I foed the user in question a long time ago. I can't stand idiots, and am always tempted to call such people out on their idiocy. Conquer Club, however, tends to think of that as "flaming" (see my ban for the use of the word "moron"), and bans me for it. Hence, the foe list has saved me from earning my month-long ban. I'll continue using the foe list, and add to it as necessary, in order to keep myself from being banned.

I'd like to note here, for the sake of the over-zealous mods, that I have NOT referred to anyone in particular as an "idiot" in this post. I am saying that if there were an "idiot" posting in these forums, that I would not be able to stand such a person, and would foe them. People on my foe list may or may not be idiots; I can not possibly comment, seeing as I no longer read posts made by people on my foe list. No flaming was committed in this post.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
jefjef
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: A moral question about foeing

Post by jefjef »

This post was made by bubbles who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by chunks who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by puddles who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by spew who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by Oxygen thief who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by waste of skin who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.


Image

Disclaimer: I have NOT referred to anyone in particular as an "idiot" in this post.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”