Moderator: Community Team
Woodruff wrote:Advertising spammers suck.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Army of GOD wrote:inb4 <looks at Haggis' post>...uh...Phatscotty ruins the thread?
Woodruff wrote:Advertising spammers suck.
MeDeFe wrote:Woodruff wrote:Advertising spammers suck.
4 posts in 8 months... Not a spambot then.
MeDeFe wrote:Carry on. Just keep it confined to one thread.


riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Woodruff wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Woodruff wrote:Advertising spammers suck.
4 posts in 8 months... Not a spambot then.
I didn't say he was a spambot, which would correllate to frequency. He absolutely is an advertising spammer.MeDeFe wrote:Carry on. Just keep it confined to one thread.
I thought all advertising for other sites was supposed to be confined to one particular place on the site? Did that requirement go away?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.


Woodruff wrote:
That's not quite WHAT I was remembering. But that may well be what I'm remembering. In fact, I'm pretty sure it is. Good call.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.

