America didn't land on the moon

Army of GOD · Post by **Army of GOD** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:49 am

I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are

PLAYER57832 · Post by **PLAYER57832** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:43 am

Army of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are

You really are new, here! Or.. maybe I am just really, really old

Anyway, they were good guys. (and yes, I do mean "guys" as in "male"

)

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 am

Army of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are

And that is why, on the Internet, you are 12 (and I am 30)

Army of GOD · Post by **Army of GOD** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:51 am

InkL0sed wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are

And that is why, on the Internet, you are 12 (and I am 30)

Does that make Al Gore ∞?

BigBallinStalin · Post by **BigBallinStalin** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:02 pm

And if Al Gore is ∞, can he enlighten us on the furthest reaches of the Cyber Universe?

Neoteny · Post by **Neoteny** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:18 pm

Army of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are

:[

Army of GOD · Post by **Army of GOD** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:21 pm

=(

john9blue · Post by **john9blue** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:44 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I do'nt know who either backglass or suggs are

You really are new, here! Or.. maybe I am just really, really old

Anyway, they were good guys. (and yes, I do mean "guys" as in "male" )

suggs was cool, backglass was a douche.

and pedro, as always, can't accept that america is a great nation that has done great things.

Haggis_McMutton · Post by **Haggis_McMutton** » Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:27 am

Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I love when an old thread is bumped, and someone quotes and responds to people who said something years ago.

I'm gonna respond to this post 3 years from now.

Also, this is vintage off-topics right here. Holy shit, almost forgot about backglass and suggs.

Shit. I'm late.

Sorry AoG.

Post by **Dukasaur** » Sun Sep 13, 2015 10:00 am

Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I love when an old thread is bumped, and someone quotes and responds to people who said something years ago.

I'm gonna respond to this post 3 years from now.

Also, this is vintage off-topics right here. Holy shit, almost forgot about backglass and suggs.

Shit. I'm late.

Sorry AoG.

Better late than never. Good job, remembering a resolution for that long!

Metsfanmax · Post by **Metsfanmax** » Sun Sep 13, 2015 11:21 am

Dukasaur wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I love when an old thread is bumped, and someone quotes and responds to people who said something years ago.

I'm gonna respond to this post 3 years from now.

Also, this is vintage off-topics right here. Holy shit, almost forgot about backglass and suggs.

Shit. I'm late.

Sorry AoG.

Better late than never. Good job, remembering a resolution for that long!

Agreed. Almost as impressive as the fact that we landed on the moon.

Funkyterrance · Post by **Funkyterrance** » Sun Sep 13, 2015 11:27 am

I could give a shit if we landed there or not.

subtleknifewield · Post by **subtleknifewield** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 1:55 am

ParadiceCity9 wrote:Well then prove there aren't any pictures.

You must be joking. You cannot prove a negative.

Phatscotty · Post by **Phatscotty** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:00 am

subtleknifewield · Post by **subtleknifewield** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:13 am

PLAYER57832 wrote:They did, though they left a great deal more in orbit. Some of it entered the moon atmosphere and burned up.

While I agree with most of what you said...the moon has no atmosphere.

Phatscotty · Post by **Phatscotty** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:31 am

The moon landing was real.

The film and pictures were fake.

subtleknifewield · Post by **subtleknifewield** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:02 am

Phatscotty wrote:The moon landing was real.

The film and pictures were fake.

Lol, sure.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:30 am

Phatscotty wrote:The moon landing was real.

The film and pictures were fake.

--Andy

subtleknifewield · Post by **subtleknifewield** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:00 pm

Ohmergard, people, why won't you just let this thread DIE?!!! *Stabs the thread repeatedly with a broken knife*

2dimes · Post by **2dimes** » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:38 am

Necro bumping is very popular here and this was a terrific one because, Haggis has been absent yet came in near the anniversary of when he pre planned it. A+++

Army of GOD · Post by **Army of GOD** » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:42 am

holy shit its Egg_McMuffin

subtleknifewield · Post by **subtleknifewield** » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:43 pm

2dimes wrote:Necro bumping is very popular here and this was a terrific one because, Haggis has been absent yet came in near the anniversary of when he pre planned it. A+++

True enough. Still

*STAB STAB STAB!* Is the thread dead yet?

jonesthecurl · Post by **jonesthecurl** » Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:10 pm

Pedronicus wrote:Very interesting that NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter can take a picture of the Phoenix Lander... It is 15 feet wide with the solar panels out.

AndyDufresne wrote:New image as seen from above by NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. The blue looking feature in the upper-center part of the picture is the Phoenix Lander...two the circular parts flanking the center mass are the deployed solar panels.

The two impact depressions located in the center of the image is where the heat shield, after being jettisoned, impacted and bounced.

And the parachute and attachment is located at the bottom of the image.[bigimg]http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/230842main_PSP_008591_2485_RGB_Lander-str.jpg[/bigimg]

--Andy

I know this an old topic, but here's the photos...
http://imgur.com/gyt2mUm

Stuff allegedly left on the moon after America landed on the moon (cough, cough)....
6 x Lunar landing modules
Dimensions
Height: 20.9 ft 6.37 m
Diameter: 14 ft 4.27 m
Landing gear span: 29.75 ft 9.07 m
Volume: 235 ft³ 6.65 m³

3 x Lunar Roving Vehicles (Moon Buggy) : The frame was 10 feet (3 m) long with a wheelbase of 7.5 feet (2.3 m).

No photos to date of these items, plus the flags, footprints and other stuff left behind.....

If America can photo the surface of Mars in a good enough quality to pick out a 15 foot wide lander, it can't hard to launch a high resolution satellite to orbit the moon and take some photos to prove the landings once and for all.

/ · Post by / » Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:53 pm

I honestly don't know if man walked on the moon. I'd personally call it more of a combination of hobbling and skipping.

PLAYER57832 · Post by **PLAYER57832** » Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:57 pm

Pedronicus wrote:
If America can photo the surface of Mars in a good enough quality to pick out a 15 foot wide lander, it can't hard to launch a high resolution satellite to orbit the moon and take some photos to prove the landings once and for all.

Cannot be bothered to read through the entire thread, but these photos do exist, as do multiple other forms of proof. You just have to search real science sites.

America didn't land on the moon

Has man walked on the moon?

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon

Re: America didn't land on the moon