Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
shoop76 wrote:Accused:
mwaser
dumhic
The accused are suspected of:
Other: diplomacy abuse
Game number(s):
Game 9776572
Game 10041941
Comments: These 2 games are from a singles tournament. Yes they did report what they were doing. However, diplomacy in multiple games ensuring that both players advance should be considered cheating. What is the point of singles games or a singles tournament when it is OK to team up as long as you declare it. This is a case of diplomacy abuse or whatever you want to name it.
greenoaks wrote:shoop could have left the largest player alone, attacked dumhic to reduce him to 3rd, securing 2nd spot & advance but didn't.
i don't mean to be harsh but if he had a better understanding of the rules for advancing he could have been playing 1v1 with dumhic & 1st sitting it out.
or he understood the rules for advancement better and convinced dumhic to fight his battle against shoop for himHighlanderAttack wrote:greenoaks wrote:shoop could have left the largest player alone, attacked dumhic to reduce him to 3rd, securing 2nd spot & advance but didn't.
i don't mean to be harsh but if he had a better understanding of the rules for advancing he could have been playing 1v1 with dumhic & 1st sitting it out.
mwaser the higher rank clearly manipulated dumhic into being a cheater
Play to finish 2nd? I cannot do that. They don't award points for 2nd. In the larger picture, not just this tournament what bothers me in an instance like this as that the 3rd person (me in this case) has no chance of winning. However, I could still handle that as this has happened before. However, it is not an isolated case with these 2 as all od a sudden they have found a good strategy together.greenoaks wrote:shoop could have left the largest player alone, attacked dumhic to reduce him to 3rd, securing 2nd spot & advance but didn't.
i don't mean to be harsh but if he had a better understanding of the rules for advancing he could have been playing 1v1 with dumhic & 1st sitting it out.
greenoaks wrote:or he understood the rules for advancement better and convinced dumhic to fight his battle against shoop for himHighlanderAttack wrote:greenoaks wrote:shoop could have left the largest player alone, attacked dumhic to reduce him to 3rd, securing 2nd spot & advance but didn't.
i don't mean to be harsh but if he had a better understanding of the rules for advancing he could have been playing 1v1 with dumhic & 1st sitting it out.
mwaser the higher rank clearly manipulated dumhic into being a cheater

there is the problem. you are focused on points and tournaments are about medals.shoop76 wrote:Play to finish 2nd? I cannot do that. They don't award points for 2nd.