Moderator: Community Team
strike wolf wrote: I guess my main point in this post is what I mentioned earlier. WHat changed in the half a day or so that made you change your mind about the BG case? Because I don't see anything.
I didn't say much had happened in the last half day - in fact if you read what I said, I admit there was that NOT much had happened in the last half day, but that I did want to contribute my thoughts about the past 36 hours, about the middle of which was BGs claim, and on one side were the votes that. pressured him to claim and on the other were reaction to the claim (and some reaction to your changing quotes fun funSwifte wrote:I will go ahead and throw my two cents out there on everything since activity has slowed again a little. While I didn't initially find there to be much in strike's case against BG, the last 36 hours have been pretty revealing.
It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
Betiko's post listed 3 options:Swifte wrote:It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.

I think you should of announced you were new to forum mafia at the beginning of the game. Noobiness is often interpreted a scummy. I remember my first couple games Safari called me out every time and I took so much heat. Hell, he still does because I need a lot of improving. I haven't seen you before, but I am fairly new too and thought you have been here before.Swifte wrote:
As to the accusations of submarining against myself - the truth is this is my first forum based mafia game anywhere ever. I signed up cause I'm a CC medal whore (self-professed!) and I am familiar with the game from playing in real life so I thought I'd give it a shot. Yes, it took me a while to acclimate to the expections, I wasn't even sure how to make a case based on some transcripts and quotes, (I'm used to playing where Night is first so you at least know who the mob killed the first day to start the discussion), and so I took the time to watch and learn from more experienced players like strike and Roidon in where they were making their deductions from betiko and BG's replies, meanwhile contributing in the little ways I thought I could to show that yes, I'm commited to the game, and trying to support the town cause however I could, just still learning what to do. (True story - I had to ask safariguy what it meant to 'confirm in the thread') And when I finally thought I kind of had it figured out and stuck my toe out to state my assessment of events to date and that I finally felt comfortable voting, it's gotten slammed back in my face. You all are misinterpreting my noobiness as scuminess. I'd like to give more people some time to read my last two posts before claiming since we still have a little time left and I'm not quite imminent, but if there's a call for me to claim I will.

If you are at L-2 as was previously mentioned it might be a good idea to claim. deadline is Sunday and some people will be less active tomorrow and Sunday (myself for example). If it is important enough then it might be a good idea to give people enough reason to unvote now.Swifte wrote:It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
As to the accusations of submarining against myself - the truth is this is my first forum based mafia game anywhere ever. I signed up cause I'm a CC medal whore (self-professed!) and I am familiar with the game from playing in real life so I thought I'd give it a shot. Yes, it took me a while to acclimate to the expections, I wasn't even sure how to make a case based on some transcripts and quotes, (I'm used to playing where Night is first so you at least know who the mob killed the first day to start the discussion), and so I took the time to watch and learn from more experienced players like strike and Roidon in where they were making their deductions from betiko and BG's replies, meanwhile contributing in the little ways I thought I could to show that yes, I'm commited to the game, and trying to support the town cause however I could, just still learning what to do. (True story - I had to ask safariguy what it meant to 'confirm in the thread') And when I finally thought I kind of had it figured out and stuck my toe out to state my assessment of events to date and that I finally felt comfortable voting, it's gotten slammed back in my face. You all are misinterpreting my noobiness as scuminess. I'd like to give more people some time to read my last two posts before claiming since we still have a little time left and I'm not quite imminent, but if there's a call for me to claim I will.
I'm curious... anyone thought about this final possibility?drunkmonkey wrote:Betiko's post listed 3 options:Swifte wrote:It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
1)BG is scum and you are town
2)BG is town and you are scum
3)You're both town
His post covered every scenario. Why did you get so animated that he brought up option 2?
I got animated on #2 because I know for a fact that it is not true - and since I'm the only one that knows for sure I need to refute it for the good of the town and for myself. I added that additional information so everyone could see I am being 100% clear and transparent as to my actions so that you will see that what I have done to this point should not be interpreted as scum.drunkmonkey wrote:Betiko's post listed 3 options:Swifte wrote:It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
1)BG is scum and you are town
2)BG is town and you are scum
3)You're both town
His post covered every scenario. Why did you get so animated that he brought up option 2?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I felt there was an option missing but take this as an hypothesis. 5) Betiko, BG and swifte are scum. BG and swifte duel so the winner looks like town leading case on scum buddy. Betiko misses out the double scum option deliberately in the hope it doesn't occur to us. This is all extreme WIFOM.trinicardinal wrote:If you are at L-2 as was previously mentioned it might be a good idea to claim. deadline is Sunday and some people will be less active tomorrow and Sunday (myself for example). If it is important enough then it might be a good idea to give people enough reason to unvote now.Swifte wrote:It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
As to the accusations of submarining against myself - the truth is this is my first forum based mafia game anywhere ever. I signed up cause I'm a CC medal whore (self-professed!) and I am familiar with the game from playing in real life so I thought I'd give it a shot. Yes, it took me a while to acclimate to the expections, I wasn't even sure how to make a case based on some transcripts and quotes, (I'm used to playing where Night is first so you at least know who the mob killed the first day to start the discussion), and so I took the time to watch and learn from more experienced players like strike and Roidon in where they were making their deductions from betiko and BG's replies, meanwhile contributing in the little ways I thought I could to show that yes, I'm commited to the game, and trying to support the town cause however I could, just still learning what to do. (True story - I had to ask safariguy what it meant to 'confirm in the thread') And when I finally thought I kind of had it figured out and stuck my toe out to state my assessment of events to date and that I finally felt comfortable voting, it's gotten slammed back in my face. You all are misinterpreting my noobiness as scuminess. I'd like to give more people some time to read my last two posts before claiming since we still have a little time left and I'm not quite imminent, but if there's a call for me to claim I will.
I'm curious... anyone thought about this final possibility?drunkmonkey wrote:Betiko's post listed 3 options:Swifte wrote:It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
1)BG is scum and you are town
2)BG is town and you are scum
3)You're both town
His post covered every scenario. Why did you get so animated that he brought up option 2?
4) they're both scum and this is a plan to establish one of them solidly as town? for the experienced players... does any of this make sense. I suspect that either Option 1 or Option 2 is the more likely option but I was wondering.
Also chapcrap has been posting a lot more recently so my reservations about him submarining have diminished, therefore Unvote

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Well this certainly changes things.Swifte wrote:Fine, I really did not want to but there are too many calls for me to claim before the weekend.
I am Dr. Finklestein, Town Doctor.
NOT evil doctor mind you.. just regular old townie doctor. I'm sorry that I've botched this all up and somehow managed to fling myself in to the limelight on Day 1. I definitely have a lot to learn about how to play this game in the forums.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
How did I know this would turn upRodion wrote:9 - How should I play my role?
e) town watcher - in this particular game, watch the doctor. This will either prevent scum from killing the doctor or at least give us insurance that we will lynch the doctor's killer the next day.