Victor Sullivan wrote:Hm, at this point, it appears we have two options, given recent situations: lynch chapcrap (or bring him to claim) given his semi-scummy behavior, or go to a no lynch, likely with some night actions to be performed on chap. With the prospect of lynching chapcrap, there is the possibility that he claims a town role and we all believe him, going into Night 1 with a no lynch and two claimed townies. And with going with a no lynch, several night actions (tracker, cop, watcher, etc.) may be wasted on him, giving town not much more information other than what we got on chap (which, in the worst case scenario, would point to his being town, giving us with again, not much to go on Day 2). I think the better option at this point is a no lynch, with strictly the cop investigating chap (as I imagine we have one), so as to broaden our knowledge of night actions.
vote no lynch
-Sully
I disagree with this. Although I don't want to claim, I think this is a faulty idea. If the cop wastes his investigation on me, then it deprives the town of an actual investigation of someone who may be scum. I will claim voluntarily before I let that happen. Better to have 2 claimed townies and let the investigatory townies use their powers on others, IMO.
Had a brainwave while typing this post so it might not make sense but what if he was the mafia godfather who was investigate immune and had a one-shot bulletproof vest (can they have both 
). So his claim would be as safe as houses. I've only just thought about that on the fly so feel free to criticise](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall"){kind=small}
