Moderator: Community Team

He sends in the mafia night kill and chooses who commits the kill. Usually is innocent if the cop investigates and sometime bulletproof too.betiko wrote:pardon my noobishness again; but can you explain what does a mafia godfather do?
his power is that he always turns out cleared when he is investigated? he got other powers as well?
is there a mafia godfather in every game?


As far as I understand it (and I am subject to correction) the Godfather leads the mafia (the head of the mafia). He is generally shown as innocent on cop investigations and may be bulletproof, whether fully or one shot bulletproof. He is normally the one to make the kill or sometimes can specify who is the person making the kill...Does not exist in all games But I have seen it a fairly common role from the games I have read. Honestly, i would be surprised if this role is not in this game.betiko wrote:pardon my noobishness again; but can you explain what does a mafia godfather do?
his power is that he always turns out cleared when he is investigated? he got other powers as well?
is there a mafia godfather in every game?

just for clarification btw folks... I am not advocating a no lynch at this point in time. I'm just saying lets not rush to a decision and examine the cases available to us.trinicardinal wrote:There is another possibility that I have not seen - what if Rodion is Mafia Godfather and this is indeed a fake claim (safe or otherwise)... correct me if I'm wrong here but - investigation would show him as town and we would likely then accept his claim and which would then put him in a position where he is not going to get killed at night and not lynched during the day, giving mafia an extremely strong position (if he is indeed Godfather)dazza2008 wrote:I think we are better to deal with this today. If we leave it to night for Rodion to be investigated and he is town the mafia could interfere with the investigation(if they have a framer or something). So I think it will be best to get this over with today or we will be in the same boat tomorrow.Swifte wrote:Why exactly is it to our advantage to potentially detonate a townie bomb with what will most likely also be a townie (-2 townies with night coming = -3 townies)? Just hoping to get info about who absolutely wouldn't hammer, which could equally as well be a town power role or a mafia? Why do that, when we can investigate the bomb to verify and hopefully only lose 1 townie over night and either have a guaranteed target or at least a solid claim with some suspects? Why the eagerness to blow up (for lack of a better phrase) the whole game right now?
With no deadline, we even could choose to believe the bomb claim for now and pick another case without risking two town at once. Are we really making the best play here?
In what way have I not been active???betiko wrote:also dazza is not very active on day 2 i think.
I'm not saying we definitely need to lynch immediately or at all but it is definitely something to think about and keep in mind.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Dont have time to post all my thoughts on everything, but wanted to make sure I answered this question. I was waiting for Rodion to post and when he did, he attacked the latest voters on him. Jonty and Jimfinn. I felt like if I never put him at L-1 he would of never claimed.betiko wrote:
FOS mob; can you explain me what made you change your mind in the last couple of hours about not putting someone at l-1 before he claims??
The problem with the busdriver driving the bomb is a. With the bomb known the mafia know a potential way around this and b. We need the busdriver for the doctor. Any secondary protective (or watcher) roles should still be placed on swifte just in case.MeDeFe wrote:(5 new pages later...) (and 2 posts while writing this)
ok... If Rodion is town only a townie would hammer him at this point. I don't think scum would take the chance of betting on him being a fakeclaiming townie. The loss is potentially too great and safari has included bombs in his games before, there's precedence.
If he is scum they were unlikely to kill him anyway, though sacrificing a goon to "clear" a more powerful scum member is a useful strategy at times. What makes that unlikely at this point is that we have too many people who are being suspected in this game, there's no reason to make a scum member seem townish since there are so many potential cases around, some of them are bound to be on townies and all that's needed is to gently press for those rather than for any potential cases on scum members.
Then again, as betiko noted earlier, as fakeclaims go bomb may well be the best there is. This is especially true if you're an enabling role, like the godfather is in some variants, and have to do your damnedest to stay alive. Noone will want to target you with a kill and you show up as innocent.
I'm not fully convinced that you're telling us the truth about your role, but I think there's a possiblity of a busdriver being in the game as well, and whether you're really a bomb or a fakeclaiming godfather, the busdriver has the potential to screw over the scum after your claim either way. I'd advocate for keeping you alive for now.
unvote
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Just realized Medefe said it best. Just like Strike said there is a zero percent chance he is going to hammer. There is a zero percent chance that mafia will hammer. we cant make anyone hammer, and if Rodion starts being agressive about it, their scum pals will probably back them up.MeDeFe wrote: ok... If Rodion is town only a townie would hammer him at this point. I don't think scum would take the chance of betting on him being a fakeclaiming townie. The loss is potentially too great and safari has included bombs in his games before, there's precedence.
Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
I know Strike has said more than once chap would do it, but didn't chap say he would before Rodion's claim? I thought that was part of Strike's defense on why he shouldn't do it. I don't know when chap said it that's why, if he did volunteer after the claim I am all for it.Swifte wrote:Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
No I haven't discarded my former reason but I have explained it further and about the time-wasting I got mixed up with Greek game which has deadlines every two weeks (I'm even voting in green at times) and you haven't addressed any points in my argument.Rodion wrote:Jonty, being sick is understadable, but your Dec 3rd post had to adress mine, didn't it? The way it happened, it seems like you got to "sneak" a poorly motivated vote and you wouldn't have ever adressed anything if I had not called you out today.
So, did you discard your former reason and just came up with a new one or is this the original reasoning? I don't see your latest post saying anything about me trying to delay town. Ironically, if Jim is a cop and you think I'm mafia, why would I delay his wagon?
jonty125 wrote:I never said it was "set in stone", I said you tried to sell it as a geniune case when it wasn't you should never have to revert to your 'case'
EBWOP "set in stone" section I pressed submit not previewOh, you didn't?jonty wrote:You made a shocking case against strike I thought to myself - what the hell is he doing? After many moments thought I came up with your scum trying to delay us (rubbish, I know). So I voted you for your poor logic in your case against strike and selling it as "set in stone" ← Does this clarify
Strike, it felt like you wouldn't unvote, but your post was still too "on the fence". Your latest one is much better and clearer. Thank you.

and why are you anxious for us to lose what is likely to be 2 townies? As was stated no scum is going to hammer. so we'll just be down 2 townies for the effort,Swifte wrote:Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
because I can't help but think Rodion is lying. Its the perfect claim for the game right now, almost too perfect, and I don't think its a coincidence. I think I need to do research on the games where Rodion is scum and try to find his claims. Dont have time at the moment though.trinicardinal wrote:and why are you anxious for us to lose what is likely to be 2 townies? As was stated no scum is going to hammer. so we'll just be down 2 townies for the effort,Swifte wrote:Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
fastposted by 2 people.
Second post after Rodion claimed:MoB Deadly wrote:I know Strike has said more than once chap would do it, but didn't chap say he would before Rodion's claim? I thought that was part of Strike's defense on why he shouldn't do it. I don't know when chap said it that's why, if he did volunteer after the claim I am all for it.Swifte wrote:Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
fastposted by trini and mob.chapcrap wrote:I'll hammer if you would like. I have nothing to lose. Although if your claim is true, it sucks that we are going to lose two town.Rodion wrote:Clown with the Tear-Away Face, town bomb.
That said, I'll probably want either Strike or Chap to be the hammer (so unvote, let someone else L-1 and then hammer). I'll know for sure after I get to interrogate Jonty some more and possibly hear input from some quiet people (Shield, Leitz, Swifte come to mind).
Can we get a vote count and a clarification on the deadline?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Because the busdriver can only target 1 person, right?strike wolf wrote:The problem with the busdriver driving the bomb is
b. We need the busdriver for the doctor.
yup agree with trini. again you seem a bit too anxious to see this happen. why don't you volunteer mob?trinicardinal wrote:and why are you anxious for us to lose what is likely to be 2 townies? As was stated no scum is going to hammer. so we'll just be down 2 townies for the effort,Swifte wrote:Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
fastposted by 2 people.


Its the first time I've faced it also. I also agree that its an extremely good fake claim to use if it is indeed a fake claim. My problem is that if a townie hammers and the claim is real then we lose 2 townies. we are already down 2 so that will make 4 and then night will add another so that will make 5 townies and NO SCUM dead by day 3 IF and only IF Rodion is telling the truth and town hammers. that's a tough situation to be in... it may still be better to leave Rodion for now and let those with night roles do what they can... I don't know what is the best thing to do.MoB Deadly wrote:because I can't help but think Rodion is lying. Its the perfect claim for the game right now, almost too perfect, and I don't think its a coincidence. I think I need to do research on the games where Rodion is scum and try to find his claims. Dont have time at the moment though.trinicardinal wrote:and why are you anxious for us to lose what is likely to be 2 townies? As was stated no scum is going to hammer. so we'll just be down 2 townies for the effort,Swifte wrote:Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
fastposted by 2 people.
I am certainly not anxious to vote, but right now I am convinced it is the right thing to do eventually. Is it worth to reaffirm it with a cop investigation, which will still be partially WIFOM with the mafia knowing an investigation on him is imminent.
This is the first time I've faced a bomb claim, I am honestly fairly unsure what the best thing to do is here.
Rodion, you accurately summarized my view here, but I think that instead it was you who misinterpreted trini. The way I interpretted Trini was that he was adding to my question, asking Mob why HE was so anxious to have someone hammer, not why I was.Rodion wrote: Trini, I think you're misinterpreting Swifte (or were you talking to Mob?). He's not trying to force Chap to hammer, he is just interested in knowing why Mob would rather have Dazza hammer instead of Chap. Swifte's thoughts on the situation were already given in his penultimate post and you can clearly tell he is not anxious at all.
Regarding a, the busdriver (if there is one) knows the scum know this, and the scum know that the busdriver knows this as well, and so it goes. There might not even be a busdriver, in which case the scum may end up killing their fakeclaiming godfather because they thought he'd be busdriven and therefor safe to target.strike wolf wrote: The problem with the busdriver driving the bomb is a. With the bomb known the mafia know a potential way around this and b. We need the busdriver for the doctor. Any secondary protective (or watcher) roles should still be placed on swifte just in case.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
yup, i do think crazy things will happen tonight and that mafia will have dificult choices to make!MeDeFe wrote:Regarding a, the busdriver (if there is one) knows the scum know this, and the scum know that the busdriver knows this as well, and so it goes. There might not even be a busdriver, in which case the scum may end up killing their fakeclaiming godfather because they thought he'd be busdriven and therefor safe to target.strike wolf wrote: The problem with the busdriver driving the bomb is a. With the bomb known the mafia know a potential way around this and b. We need the busdriver for the doctor. Any secondary protective (or watcher) roles should still be placed on swifte just in case.
It's exactly the same thing with the doctor, really, the scum may actively be avoiding targeting the doc because they assume he's being busdriven or watched, and the busdriver and/or watcher may be going for completely different targets because they know the mafia may not even be targeting the doc.
So there isn't just wine but a whole assortment of beverages in front of them because there's the safe way of playing the game, and then there are the crazy things people actually do.
And fastposted about 8 or 10 times... But this goes for what Rodion wrote as well. There's simply too much wine on the table to make any good predictions about who's going to switch who and who'll watch or protect whom.
