Moderator: Community Team
First off, if I hang back and let cases develop, it's quite likely that someone would have called me out for playing differently and I probably would have had to claim anyways. And at this point, with the doctor dead, mafia know that they probably are almost 100% guaranteed to killing town each night, and with such a small game, wasting a NK on me makes less sense. So yes, I suppose they could kill me if they wanted to, but that just gives the town cop more time to find them.Rodion wrote:Before I sleep I have a message to both players!
Safari, why would you play so agressively with a survivor role (you posted a lot since D1 and lead the case on Violet, shouldn't a survivor try to contribute as few as possible as to not rise in the mafia's priority list of who to kill?)?
Jonty, please pinpoint when you did your research to conclude that Safari was Prometheus.
jonty probably picked up on it. Besides, making up a flavor cop claim isn't that difficult.safariguy5 wrote:I actually went to Wikipedia and looked up the Titans, and obviously different stories have different accounts. While Prometheus seems the obvious choice about being chained to a rock, I would like to point out that out of the Titans, he's probably one of them that seems less likely to be mafia. I think he probably cares less about Godly affairs and more about the fate of mankind (giving the fire). And Hercules eventually frees him, and we don't hear anything more about him.
Supposedly, he helps the Olympian Gods during the Great War, but again, with all the sources, we cannot be sure. I'm just saying that a chained god is vague enough that it could be almost any prisoner of Tartarus, but I don't remember Cronus being cut to pieces.

We studied Ancient Greece @ school and I remembered something about giving fire to man and been punished - put "who gave fire to man in Google" and voila first link is the Wikipedia page to Promtheus. Read it, confirmed what I thought. Discussion about the chained god probably set something off sub-consciounsly but I did clarify with Wikipedia. Was hoping to follow Rodion's advice about not claiming, but oh well.Rodion wrote: Jonty, please pinpoint when you did your research to conclude that Safari was Prometheus.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I'd like to point out that even if you were flavor cop, all your investigations would point out would be the identity of the God. Thunderbolts=Zeus, Trident=Poseidon, Winged Feet=Hermes etc. Doesn't really show how you think I'm mafia besides flavor spec that all Titans are mafia.jonty125 wrote:We studied Ancient Greece @ school and I remembered something about giving fire to man and been punished - put "who gave fire to man in Google" and voila first link is the Wikipedia page to Promtheus. Read it, confirmed what I thought. Discussion about the chained god probably set something off sub-consciounsly but I did clarify with Wikipedia. Was hoping to follow Rodion's advice about not claiming, but oh well.Rodion wrote: Jonty, please pinpoint when you did your research to conclude that Safari was Prometheus.
BTW Would someone mind unvoting, I'm at L-1.

Apparently, Safari took Rodion's advice from Day 1 and watched chap last night. It is quite obvious why Saf choose to watch chap. As chap was a claimed townie (doctor), he was most likely going to be the mafia's choice for a night kill.Rodion wrote:If we have a town watcher, we should be able to get one scum down (you watched Chap like I told you, right?!).
jonty125 wrote:Would that be wikipediastrike wolf wrote:Forget what I said. The part about Cronos appears to have been from an unreliable source.strike wolf wrote:Chained God seems to be Kronos (no surprise) as part of his punishment was to carry a chain. Could also be Prometheus as he was chained to a rock for giving mortals fire but that's less likely. also. Anyone wasn't Kronos sent in pieces to Tartarus. Note to mod you need to adjust first post title becuase it says 11/11 and chap needs to be on a dead list. Let's hope we have a watcher who saw who killed chapcrap.
FASTPOSTED by rodion
Jonty mentioned learning about Greek mythology in school. But if he received three images (fire, liver, eagle), it's understandable that he could correctly gather that the images describe Prometheus. Yet, if you think back to Jonty's previous post, he was making a distinction between the evil gods, and the kind-hearted ones.jonty125 wrote:We studied Ancient Greece @ school and I remembered something about giving fire to man and been punished - put "who gave fire to man in Google" and voila first link is the Wikipedia page to Promtheus. Read it, confirmed what I thought. Discussion about the chained god probably set something off sub-consciounsly but I did clarify with Wikipedia. Was hoping to follow Rodion's advice about not claiming, but oh well.Rodion wrote: Jonty, please pinpoint when you did your research to conclude that Safari was Prometheus.
BTW Would someone mind unvoting, I'm at L-1.
This is right after safari brings up his case against Jonty. However, when Jonty was placing this vote, he supposedly ALREADY knew Safari's role. And in other posts, he stated that Prometheus wasn't a bad role.jonty125 wrote:
Vote Saf for being an hypocrite and this is not OMGUS!!
However it was an omgus. His vote would have been much better received, if he came out with his investigation, or at least more circumstantial evidence. He provided neither, which screams of a scum reaction to me.jonty125 wrote:
Vote Saf for being an hypocrite and this is not OMGUS!!

pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
inactive BW...jonty wrote:I counted Victor twice unvote vote Violet
jonty125 wrote:unvote I'm happy with Vio has now proved her abilities
Lets have a breakdown on the votes on mechapcrap wrote:It appears that Vio is cleared...However, I thought that I had voted for Vio... No big deal.edocsil wrote:Vote Count
safariguy (1) - chapcrap
chapcrap (1) -PCM
jonty (4) - conzo, MeDeFe, Violet, ???
Violet (4) - safariguy, victor, strike wolf, jonty
11 alive, 6 to lynch
Since jonty has 4 votes, perhaps we could hear from him?
1.JokevoteConzocool wrote:Hmmmm...![]()
unvote vote Sully unvote revote Jonty! for swearing to an unknown god!
2.JokevoteMeDeFe wrote:unvote
vote jonty for apparently not counting correctly
3 and 4.Proving her roleVioIet wrote: Vote Jonty
The next vote count should include two votes for jonty- one from me, and one from ???
So two jokevotes, and Vio proving her role. I believe that says it all.
This one's harder. He did vote for a townie, as did I, who later turned out to be the doc. If he were scum he would know this. However, chap was playing poorly. Too wifom for anything concrete.jonty125 wrote:The reason why we pressure an inactive is because they are no help to town because a) harder to get a lynch and b) don't hear their view and can't get scumtellschapcrap wrote:About jonty:
I already explained this before. We were pressuring Vio because of supposed inactiveness at other times in mafia and on the site as a whole. With that as the predecessor, I saw no reason to not pressure jonty into a claim since we were basically just pressuring for no reason anyway.
I thought you would have known this and are dropping scumtells left and right unvote vote chapcrap
Backs off the doc... sensible for any player.That would be a gutsy move if you were mafia and I believe it unvote
I aren't going to vote no lynch because finishing the day early is of no value to town as people may still drop scumtells or voting patterns for D2.
Says he won't vote no lynch, but endorses Victor's post that he won't support another wagon. Again, nothing damning, considering the doc had just been outed.jonty125 wrote:+1Victor Sullivan wrote:Yeah, I'm certainly would not support another wagon today. We've already pushed our boundaries too far for Day 1 as it is.
-Sully
I did not provide information from Wikipedia, I made a light hearted joke about Wikipedia being an unreliable source and I recalled that Kronos was sent to pieces to Tartarus (in fact him being cut up was an incorrect memory recall)VioIet wrote:Well, I've concluded that Jonty is most likely lying. As he's L-2 right now, I can hammer him in less than an hour. I'm going to send in the action for the secret vote, however, I will hold off voting in the main thread for now. I would like some more confirmation from all, before I hammer.
But I'll try to explain why I believe saf over jonty.
Apparently, Safari took Rodion's advice from Day 1 and watched chap last night. It is quite obvious why Saf choose to watch chap. As chap was a claimed townie (doctor), he was most likely going to be the mafia's choice for a night kill.Rodion wrote:If we have a town watcher, we should be able to get one scum down (you watched Chap like I told you, right?!).
This makes me doubt that safari is lying. Any smart watcher in this game, naturally would have chosen Chap. I don't think safari would be bold enough to to lie about his role, knowing how likely it would be for the "real" watcher to counterclaim him.
Now in the very next post, Strike asks a question regarding the Chained God, and other game related flavor. Jonty posts next, and answers Strike's by providing some information from Wiki.
jonty125 wrote:Would that be wikipediastrike wolf wrote:Forget what I said. The part about Cronos appears to have been from an unreliable source.strike wolf wrote:Chained God seems to be Kronos (no surprise) as part of his punishment was to carry a chain. Could also be Prometheus as he was chained to a rock for giving mortals fire but that's less likely. also. Anyone wasn't Kronos sent in pieces to Tartarus. Note to mod you need to adjust first post title becuase it says 11/11 and chap needs to be on a dead list. Let's hope we have a watcher who saw who killed chapcrap.
FASTPOSTED by rodion
I only guessed his name & alignment not his role. I guessed his name from the pics and his alignment from thisViolet wrote:I think it is the context, that makes this post scummy. However, I will need another quote to reference why (see below). Going by what I stated above, I find it fitting that Jonty would claim to be a flavor cop. Now I can't say it's certain that a role like that can't exist. But, I don't see how receiving three images of a player/character can give any indication of their alignment. And it's just too uncanny that with all the discussion of Prometheus- that Jonty just happens to know/guess safari's exact role.
Does anyone else think this indicates Olympains vs. Titans (Olympians being town)THE MOD wrote:The Titans again stirred, ready and willing to strike down the Olympians.
No, I did not metion anything about kind-hearted Gods vs. evil gods would you care to point out the postViolet wrote:This leads me to the quote below:
Jonty mentioned learning about Greek mythology in school. But if he received three images (fire, liver, eagle), it's understandable that he could correctly gather that the images describe Prometheus. Yet, if you think back to Jonty's previous post, he was making a distinction between the evil gods, and the kind-hearted ones.jonty125 wrote:We studied Ancient Greece @ school and I remembered something about giving fire to man and been punished - put "who gave fire to man in Google" and voila first link is the Wikipedia page to Promtheus. Read it, confirmed what I thought. Discussion about the chained god probably set something off sub-consciounsly but I did clarify with Wikipedia. Was hoping to follow Rodion's advice about not claiming, but oh well.Rodion wrote: Jonty, please pinpoint when you did your research to conclude that Safari was Prometheus.
BTW Would someone mind unvoting, I'm at L-1.
Where the hell did I say Prometheus is a harmless role in comparison to Kronos!! Any mafia to lynch would be good - GF would be a BONUS!!Violet wrote:The day scene and the discussion that follows, highly implicate that whomever that Chained God was- is most likely the Mafia Godfather. Again, we can't be certain of that- but that character was responsible for chap's death.
So Jonty already sub-consciously admits that he think Prometheus is a harmless role, in comparison with the role of Kronos or whomever the Chained God might be. This leads me to belive that Jonty must have gotten some information about alignment, in addition to recieving the three images.
Deja vu, when did I say that!!Violet wrote:In a subsequent post, Strike and Safari explain that it's unlikely that Prometheus could be mafia, as he tends to side with the mortals. Saf even subtly added that he could be third party. Jonty later agrees with both of these points.
WHEN DID I STATE THAT!!Violet wrote:However:
This is right after safari brings up his case against Jonty. However, when Jonty was placing this vote, he supposedly ALREADY knew Safari's role. And in other posts, he stated that Prometheus wasn't a bad role.jonty125 wrote:
Vote Saf for being an hypocrite and this is not OMGUS!!
Your scenario is correct if we were both town. But only one of us is. I am a town flavour cop while I believe safari is fakeclaiming because he claimed a titan and I earlier in this post said this is Olympians vs. Titans. SO I therefore believe saf is mafia.Violet wrote:Why would any towns person do this?
This is the equivalent of a "townie," investigation another townie at night, and receiving an innocent response. Yet, that cleared townie votes them in the thread, and they give an omgus vote right back at them. That just makes no sense. You don't give an omgus vote to someone whom you've supposedly cleared from being mafia.
Erm, I did. Well not subtle but saf did vote me in memory of dead man who was pressuring me for joke votes and proof of role. So I made a case against him.Violet wrote:Now I'm going to analyze Jonty's actions from an entirely different persective. Let's say- ignoring all the flavor posts- that Jonty investigated saf, and felt that Prometheus was an anti-town role. Then, as Rodion advised, why would Jonty not try to start a subtle case against safari at the beginning of Day 2?
I made one flavour related post in reaaction to strike's. At the time there wasn't much evidence against saf until he dropped a clanger.Violet wrote:Instead, Jonty started the Day out with flavor posts, which I quoted above.
Investigation on Saf was random. But my vote was v. clearly explained if you read my post in full.Violet wrote:Of course, discussing the flavor is important to understand the scene. But flavor discussions mostly take place when the game is at somewhat of a hiatus. Meaning, that there are no active leads or scum-hunts at the moment, so people will mention flavor in order to generate discussion.
Jonty failed to mention a motive for investigating safari in the first place. Not only that- but if he truly felt saf was scum, why waste so much time with the flavor posts? Also, he gave no reasoning for voting saf, other than:
However it was an omgus. His vote would have been much better received, if he came out with his investigation, or at least more circumstantial evidence. He provided neither, which screams of a scum reaction to me.jonty125 wrote:
Vote Saf for being an hypocrite and this is not OMGUS!!
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Well, if I'd been beaten in a war I would probably hate the winnersstrike wolf wrote:You say that you are under the impression that all Titans are against the Gods?
I held my cards to my chest as long as I could, hoping we could get a safari lynch without me claiming but alas it wasn't to be.strike wolf wrote:You however did not bring up anything related to Safari being Prometheus until after it had been discussed for a while.
I put a flavor cop in Futurama, but i made the clues just vague enough that any 1 investigation of one person would give clues that could apply to multiple people. Subsequent investigations would narrow the scope down.Rodion wrote:I'm thinking that 3 words should allow us to always conclude the identity of whom Jonty visited. If we are to believe this game is a simple Olympyans vs. Titans game, Jonty's flavour investigation will lead us to certainty, making him, effectively, a regular cop.
Question to the most experienced players: is a mafia godafther immune to "flavour cop" investigations (would the flavour report be false/misleading?)
That said, if we do have a cop, I'd conclude that:
a) Jonty is a mafia cop
AND/OR
b) the game balance is not as simple as it seems (all Olympians town, all Titans mafia), otherwise we would essentially have 2 cops, which would be pretty much imbalanced
The catch here is that I wouldn't like the eventual cop to claim, so it's just a thought to keep in mind for now.
I say we keep milking this day before any rash decisions are made.
So he says that I was being hypocritical, but he quoted a post of mine where I explained chap's rationale for voting jonty. So really, it's not a hypocritical post because where jonty quoted me doesn't show me necessarily opposed to jonty claiming. At the time, I was personally fine with a no lynch because we had enough information to go on at that point, but it doesn't mean that at the start of Day 2 I was going to ignore chap's suspicions from Day 1. Conditions have changed, which means that comparing a post made on Day 1 to that of Day 2 isn't necessarily analogous as we know more information now than we did then.jonty125 wrote:saf wrote:But he did believe in pressuring jonty, so I'll use that as the starting point. Pending some sort of investigative claim of course.He was pressuring me as I was at L-2. This was 2 jokevotes and Vio proving her role. So you believe that this was right by following a dead man's wisheschapcrap wrote:I already explained this before. We were pressuring Vio because of supposed inactiveness at other times in mafia and on the site as a whole. With that as the predecessor, I saw no reason to not pressure jonty into a claim since we were basically just pressuring for no reason anyway.
And you said this yesterdayHow has the situation changed?saf wrote:I believe him wanting to pressure jonty is basically a symptom of chap not wanting to end the day with a no lynch. Basically, he figured since jonty had some votes on him, why not go ahead and pressure him for a roleclaim?
Vote Saf for being an hypocrite and this is not OMGUS!!

Bit of a noob question but why would mafia have a cop?Rodion wrote:I'm thinking that 3 words should allow us to always conclude the identity of whom Jonty visited. If we are to believe this game is a simple Olympyans vs. Titans game, Jonty's flavour investigation will lead us to certainty, making him, effectively, a regular cop.
Question to the most experienced players: is a mafia godafther immune to "flavour cop" investigations (would the flavour report be false/misleading?)
That said, if we do have a cop, I'd conclude that:
a) Jonty is a mafia cop
AND/OR
b) the game balance is not as simple as it seems (all Olympians town, all Titans mafia), otherwise we would essentially have 2 cops, which would be pretty much imbalanced
The catch here is that I wouldn't like the eventual cop to claim, so it's just a thought to keep in mind for now.
I say we keep milking this day before any rash decisions are made.
Chap's suspicions were based on me being at L-2. Why was I at L-2?. 2 JOKEVOTES AND PROOF OF ROLE!! You carried on using the same logic as him and that logic wreaked of scum. That's why I voted you.safariguy5 wrote:But it doesn't mean that at the start of Day 2 I was going to ignore chap's suspicions from Day 1.
I still don't see how they had changed. 4 posts had been made when you voted me. Two from strike about flavour on who did the kill, Rodion, giving advice on how to play, and myself commenting on strike and hoping for a watcher. How does that make chapcrap's logic alright to use!safariguy5 wrote:Conditions have changed, which means that comparing a post made on Day 1 to that of Day 2 isn't necessarily analogous
It would be a role cop or a flavor cop to help in kill choices.jonty125 wrote:Bit of a noob question but why would mafia have a cop?Rodion wrote:I'm thinking that 3 words should allow us to always conclude the identity of whom Jonty visited. If we are to believe this game is a simple Olympyans vs. Titans game, Jonty's flavour investigation will lead us to certainty, making him, effectively, a regular cop.
Question to the most experienced players: is a mafia godafther immune to "flavour cop" investigations (would the flavour report be false/misleading?)
That said, if we do have a cop, I'd conclude that:
a) Jonty is a mafia cop
AND/OR
b) the game balance is not as simple as it seems (all Olympians town, all Titans mafia), otherwise we would essentially have 2 cops, which would be pretty much imbalanced
The catch here is that I wouldn't like the eventual cop to claim, so it's just a thought to keep in mind for now.
I say we keep milking this day before any rash decisions are made.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Well yeah, I didn't use the best reasoning behind voting for you, but I couldn't find a better way to signal I had information. You're basically attacking me trying to stir a case without claiming. The point was to not claim if I didn't have to.jonty125 wrote:Bit of a noob question but why would mafia have a cop?Rodion wrote:I'm thinking that 3 words should allow us to always conclude the identity of whom Jonty visited. If we are to believe this game is a simple Olympyans vs. Titans game, Jonty's flavour investigation will lead us to certainty, making him, effectively, a regular cop.
Question to the most experienced players: is a mafia godafther immune to "flavour cop" investigations (would the flavour report be false/misleading?)
That said, if we do have a cop, I'd conclude that:
a) Jonty is a mafia cop
AND/OR
b) the game balance is not as simple as it seems (all Olympians town, all Titans mafia), otherwise we would essentially have 2 cops, which would be pretty much imbalanced
The catch here is that I wouldn't like the eventual cop to claim, so it's just a thought to keep in mind for now.
I say we keep milking this day before any rash decisions are made.
Chap's suspicions were based on me being at L-2. Why was I at L-2?. 2 JOKEVOTES AND PROOF OF ROLE!! You carried on using the same logic as him and that logic wreaked of scum. That's why I voted you.safariguy5 wrote:But it doesn't mean that at the start of Day 2 I was going to ignore chap's suspicions from Day 1.
I still don't see how they had changed. 4 posts had been made when you voted me. Two from strike about flavour on who did the kill, Rodion, giving advice on how to play, and myself commenting on strike and hoping for a watcher. How does that make chapcrap's logic alright to use!safariguy5 wrote:Conditions have changed, which means that comparing a post made on Day 1 to that of Day 2 isn't necessarily analogous

Prometheus sided with the Gods in the war against Kronos and the Titans. He was punished by the gods later on for stealing fire. The key word is I was stating ALL titans. Prometheus was a Titan but he sided against them in the war.jonty125 wrote:Well, if I'd been beaten in a war I would probably hate the winnersstrike wolf wrote:You say that you are under the impression that all Titans are against the Gods?
It's convenient in the fact you start bringing all this up after things shift against you. You do not focus on it before attention is shifting your way and it took a vote from Safari to get you to act on your supposed investigation.Jonty125 wrote:How so?strike wolf wrote:This whole Titans being mafia seems to be a bit convenient thing to use in hind-sight (yes this is a pun) but does not seem to be accurate with the story of the game.
I'm stilll calling BS for previously stated reasons with how it came up.Jonty125 wrote:I held my cards to my chest as long as I could, hoping we could get a safari lynch without me claiming but alas it wasn't to be.strike wolf wrote:You however did not bring up anything related to Safari being Prometheus until after it had been discussed for a while.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that