Moderator: Clan Directors
So I looked & saw 5-3 lead to aka - we need some wins!qwert wrote:well i look on all games,and AKA had nice start- and if these stay like now-Aka can win against TSM with score 7-5,or 8-4.
These could be first suprisse result in G group.
G1 vs Myt- could be 7-5 or 6-6
Please do not misrepresent the League and or the TO'seddie2 wrote:it is a real pity they picked this one rule to actually stick 2.. i did say it was ok for you to use your set. after a discussion with a g1 member.
mine mistake,i though that All your base belonge to ours, are not beta, but they are, and when i go to these map topic i realised that these are dont have any movement, no new post, like foundry foreman forget to move map out of beta. I hope that they move these map out of beta for next phase.laughingcavalier wrote:So I looked & saw 5-3 lead to aka - we need some wins!qwert wrote:well i look on all games,and AKA had nice start- and if these stay like now-Aka can win against TSM with score 7-5,or 8-4.
These could be first suprisse result in G group.
G1 vs Myt- could be 7-5 or 6-6
Reminder to everyone - no beta. One of the myth games is being swapped for a random.
Cool of you, but THIS actually, is one of the few things clans are NOT required to post ("Away" lineups).woopintroysbutt wrote:Here are the Myth Players for TSM's Home Maps for Round 4.
Weekly Game Exchange Schedule wrote:The same list of home game maps, settings and players must be posted in the division thread (for the benefit of the opposing 1st contact) no later than Monday night midnight CC time. Failure to make this post will result in a random selection of one of the offending clan's home games in the same round having Random map settings (escalating, chained, sunny).
Which penalty applies? Or do both?Relevant Rulings wrote:The same list of home game maps, settings and players must be posted, by the home clan first contact, in the division thread (for the benefit of the opposing 1st contact) no later than Monday night midnight CC time. Failure to make this post will result in the Division Director randomly selecting two of the offending clan's away games in that round, and randomly assigning players to these two games from the clan's provisional list of players (the other away games will be assigned players as per the First Contact's list).
The problem is, in two different 'official' lists, each of those is listed as the "only" penalty. Hence the question. Is it A, B, or both?Leehar wrote:1 home game given random map, and 2 away games given random players? For the same offense?
Failure to make this post will result in the Division Director randomly selecting two of the offending clan's away games in that round, and randomly assigning players to these two games from the clan's provisional list of players (the other away games will be assigned players as per the First Contact's list).
when was that added it used to be you had to pm your division leader your home games ?????DJ Teflon wrote:Sorry - we noticed our mistake here.
This is the correct version:Failure to make this post will result in the Division Director randomly selecting two of the offending clan's away games in that round, and randomly assigning players to these two games from the clan's provisional list of players (the other away games will be assigned players as per the First Contact's list).
They added that right after round/week 1... when they made it so that we DIDN'T have to *PM THE OPPONENT* your home games and teams. They announced it them, effective with week 3.eddie2 wrote:when was that added it used to be you had to pm your division leader your home games ?????DJ Teflon wrote:Sorry - we noticed our mistake here.
This is the correct version:Failure to make this post will result in the Division Director randomly selecting two of the offending clan's away games in that round, and randomly assigning players to these two games from the clan's provisional list of players (the other away games will be assigned players as per the First Contact's list).
ah ok well i have to state that aka have not followed this rule via tsm or g1. also we have not had these random games made for breach of the rule. i think if they need 2 they should remake them games before they start.Kinnison wrote:They added that right after round/week 1... when they made it so that we DIDN'T have to *PM THE OPPONENT* your home games and teams. They announced it them, effective with week 3.eddie2 wrote:when was that added it used to be you had to pm your division leader your home games ?????DJ Teflon wrote:Sorry - we noticed our mistake here.
This is the correct version:Failure to make this post will result in the Division Director randomly selecting two of the offending clan's away games in that round, and randomly assigning players to these two games from the clan's provisional list of players (the other away games will be assigned players as per the First Contact's list).
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 0#p3558868
right there.
will be esc chained benga no's the scoregradybridges wrote:eddie-might want to specify what First Nations map, type of spoils, reinforcements
????qwert wrote:MYT-WAR 6-3
We are close to take another 3 points.
mine mistake,i just look on rules,and for win get 2 point,WPBRJ wrote:????qwert wrote:MYT-WAR 6-3
We are close to take another 3 points.
