Moderator: Community Team
Au contraire. It is most definitely possible to vote yet remain quiet. Vote LeeharLeehar wrote:Deadline Thursday evening?
And sg, you can't really call someone who's at least voted, quiet
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
get well soon! we will be awaiting your return!Victor Sullivan wrote:Sorry for the lack of activity. Please be patient as I recover from an illness. If my activity drops below expectations, I understand if I must be replaced.
Apologies,
-Sully
) --- it's got SHIELDS!everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Am I being Punk'd?jgordon1111 wrote:why would you say something like that everywhere, dont take my post to mean anything in particulareverywhere116 wrote:You are Most Definitely Not A Magejgordon1111 wrote:And you will notice my vote isnt on that wagon (yet) you havent made a scum slip that would put it there
where yours on the other hand points to you being one most likely that was a bad move on your behalf,now let wait on your twin to try and back you out of this.
Get Well Sully!! I won't look for a replacement yet, if players would like a replacement just say so in the thread and I will start looking, I will leave it up to you guys.Victor Sullivan wrote:Sorry for the lack of activity. Please be patient as I recover from an illness. If my activity drops below expectations, I understand if I must be replaced.
Apologies,
-Sully
Why?crazymilkshake5 wrote:I vote that we wait on sully
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
):
) ) --- it's got SHIELDS!everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
3 days. But your point is valid. Edocsil will be lynched if the voting record stays like this, and he hasn't acted scummy in the slightest.mc05025 wrote:Vote guys. 2 days left only. We absolutely need a kill on day 1. At the first night 2 of us will die and we will have no informations at all.
) ) --- it's got SHIELDS!everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
everywhere116 wrote:3 days. But your point is valid. Edocsil will be lynched if the voting record stays like this, and he hasn't acted scummy in the slightest.mc05025 wrote:Vote guys. 2 days left only. We absolutely need a kill on day 1. At the first night 2 of us will die and we will have no informations at all.
The person I'm looking at is jgordon, mainly because of his actions on the last page. First, he was very quick to remind edocsil and us all that he hasn't hopped on the bandwagon yet. I replied with a link to TVTropes implying that he is talking too much about his innocence. He responds with a vitriolic rant against me accusing me of being a mage and waiting for my partner to defend me. This seems odd, considering that he most likely would not have such an emotional response for what could easily by taken as a joke, similar to what he was doing on the last page as well. It reminds me ofnon vulgar version
a scene from Malcom in the Middle where the Krelboynes made Dabnie lie about being locked out of "his" room to gain access to the room that the quiz bowl officials were staying in. The entire time he is incredibly nervous and after he gets the door opened by a maid he tells her as she walks away "I have been swimming!"In conclusion, because of his constant reminders of his innocence and his own overreaction to the insinuation that his reminders are too much, I think that jgordon is acting the scummiest out of all of us and deserves to by lynched.vulgar version
the typical reaction from a closeted homosexual when you, jokingly or not, call him gay or accuse him of being a homosexual. Usually he will react and say "I'M NOT GAY, I'M STRAIGHTER THAN ALL YOU FAGGOTS! I WANT TO THAT STRIP JOINT AND SPANKED ALL THOSE BITCHES, YOU HEAR ME! I SPANK HOES!!!!"
Unvote vote jgordon
Fastposted by jgordon and shield
Gonna go with Jgordon here. Though neither case is strong, I feel everywhere is using weak evidence. The majority of us end up SEEMING like we are flipping out, but really it is just the need to assert ourselves to the point where people know that the case we have is stronger (whether it be deflecting the case, or pitting our case against another). By talking like we know what we're doing, we could even be the mafia and still convince the town that we are town by having the stronger case going in, and forcing the other person/group to break down on their own case (I have done it before on a couple accounts myself. Where and when are not important).jgordon1111 wrote:there you are everywhere LOL if you call that overreacting from me you havent been in a game with me overreacting when someone calls me out.
and because you called me out 2 times for nothing,and trying to create evidence against meVote everywhere for trying to hide his mistakes twice.
I have learned a little patience everywhere,someone will slip and you did.
nothing to hide here this game, thats why I didnt overreact as you claim
Ah fast posted By SG7, ok lets get this going then
essentially, humans see logic in a logical argument. Its how mafia need to play to win. They either have to go the whole game under the radar which is near impossible, or bend and twist things to look like logical arguments, because knowing they themselves are mafia, they know that everything they say will be pointing in the wrong direction (unless theres a 3rd party and they rat them out).everywhere116 wrote:So, essentially, ghostly, a logically presented argument is more scummy than an emotional outburst? I don't follow.
Also, you said that the evidence is weak. Perhaps, but not for day 1. We have three days left until a lynch is forced. We have to pick the person who we think is scummiest based on today's talking, and that's all we have to go on. gordon has been presenting classic scumtells, and being relatively new and emotional, he would be susceptible to them. That's why I presented a case against him, and that's why I voted for him.
But as I said everywhere what you are trying to claim as an emotional outburst from me is quite incorrect. Not emotional for me at all LOL.everywhere116 wrote:So, essentially, ghostly, a logically presented argument is more scummy than an emotional outburst? I don't follow.
Also, you said that the evidence is weak. Perhaps, but not for day 1. We have three days left until a lynch is forced. We have to pick the person who we think is scummiest based on today's talking, and that's all we have to go on. gordon has been presenting classic scumtells, and being relatively new and emotional, he would be susceptible to them. That's why I presented a case against him, and that's why I voted for him.
