Moderator: Clan Directors
yea same here Pack went from 6th to 2nd yet it says we only went up +3Swifte wrote:should check your +/- column... even after adjusting for removing THOTA it seems we (IA) should be +1 for passing AOC?

I assume Pack is only +3 because of an adjustment for the removal of THOTA, but I could be wrong. Otherwise every clan that was previously below THOTA would have shown up as +1 even if there was no change... however it doesn't seem like the adjustment worked everywhere? guess we need to hear from Gunn what the real intent was.Sniper08 wrote:yea same here Pack went from 6th to 2nd yet it says we only went up +3Swifte wrote:should check your +/- column... even after adjusting for removing THOTA it seems we (IA) should be +1 for passing AOC?
thx gunn for keeping up with the rankings.




KOZ TFFS 28 23 04/08/12IcePack wrote:I still don't see KOA vs TFFS?

Again, thats the whole Thota thing. A line was removed, but unfortunately the results weren't auto-corrected.hotfire wrote:the 11 thru 16 rank area looks labeled wrong




Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.

A PM went out to all clans asking whether KORT should be handicapped or not and by how many points. The highest & lowest figures were discarded and a mean average taken of the remainder. Some felt you should be given points, the majority felt you should be docked them.Bruceswar wrote:Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.
Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.

Chariot of Fire wrote:A PM went out to all clans asking whether KORT should be handicapped or not and by how many points. The highest & lowest figures were discarded and a mean average taken of the remainder. Some felt you should be given points, the majority felt you should be docked them.Bruceswar wrote:Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.
Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.
This is a new monthly procedure for the gratification of all participating clans.


Did you not get the memo Brucey? I imagine that many items pass your desk now as the HCD..Bruceswar wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:A PM went out to all clans asking whether KORT should be handicapped or not and by how many points. The highest & lowest figures were discarded and a mean average taken of the remainder. Some felt you should be given points, the majority felt you should be docked them.Bruceswar wrote:Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.
Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.
This is a new monthly procedure for the gratification of all participating clans.
LOL![]()
![]()

More likely because your win over thota counted more last year and because it's also passed the year mark it's weighting got halved?Bruceswar wrote:Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.
Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.
Stop being so reasonable, Leehar - I much prefer CoF's explanation.Leehar wrote:More likely because your win over thota counted more last year and because it's also passed the year mark it's weighting got halved?Bruceswar wrote:Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.
Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.
I'm sure it still applies to the Power RankingsFoxglove wrote:Stop being so reasonable, Leehar - I much prefer CoF's explanation.Leehar wrote:More likely because your win over thota counted more last year and because it's also passed the year mark it's weighting got halved?Bruceswar wrote:Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.
Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.


So why is then CL in the rankings?Keefie wrote:Benga,
I think Chemefreak warned us that it probably wouldn't be entered into the rankings.