I thought he already had one...john9blue wrote:i second the motion of giving pimpdave a traumatic brain injury.
Moderator: Community Team
I thought he already had one...john9blue wrote:i second the motion of giving pimpdave a traumatic brain injury.
I think a good question is whether this is a frequent occurrence because there is more use by police of excessive force or if this is a more frequent occurrence due to technology allowing us to videotape police using excessive force. I think it's probably the latter.Woodruff wrote:While I am not in agreement that the majority of police are like those depicted in these videos, it is becoming a sadly frequent occurrence.
The idea that the public can get justice from the courts regarding crimes committed by police is just fantasy, as has been demonstrated over and over again. Really, we need a separate court system with defenders and prosecutors who are tasked with just pursuing police crimes and nothing else, which are then handed over to a specialized judicial panel (public of course) which will impartially evaluate the crime committed.
Of course, that will never happen.
I actually agree that it is the latter. I should have worded that better, as "is becoming a sadly more apparent occurrence", you're right. That being said, the rest of my point stands.thegreekdog wrote:I think a good question is whether this is a frequent occurrence because there is more use by police of excessive force or if this is a more frequent occurrence due to technology allowing us to videotape police using excessive force. I think it's probably the latter.Woodruff wrote:While I am not in agreement that the majority of police are like those depicted in these videos, it is becoming a sadly frequent occurrence.
The idea that the public can get justice from the courts regarding crimes committed by police is just fantasy, as has been demonstrated over and over again. Really, we need a separate court system with defenders and prosecutors who are tasked with just pursuing police crimes and nothing else, which are then handed over to a specialized judicial panel (public of course) which will impartially evaluate the crime committed.
Of course, that will never happen.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...

If you go to the youtube site you actually find this is a video in support of Ron Paul.pimpdave wrote:
Woodruff wrote:While I am not in agreement that the majority of police are like those depicted in these videos, it is becoming a sadly frequent occurrence.
The idea that the public can get justice from the courts regarding crimes committed by police is just fantasy, as has been demonstrated over and over again. Really, we need a separate court system with defenders and prosecutors who are tasked with just pursuing police crimes and nothing else, which are then handed over to a specialized judicial panel (public of course) which will impartially evaluate the crime committed.
Of course, that will never happen.

I agree with you. As I've mentioned before, there WILL be a revolution within ten years unless something drastically changes on this front.notyou2 wrote:Woodruff wrote:While I am not in agreement that the majority of police are like those depicted in these videos, it is becoming a sadly frequent occurrence.
The idea that the public can get justice from the courts regarding crimes committed by police is just fantasy, as has been demonstrated over and over again. Really, we need a separate court system with defenders and prosecutors who are tasked with just pursuing police crimes and nothing else, which are then handed over to a specialized judicial panel (public of course) which will impartially evaluate the crime committed.
Of course, that will never happen.
I'll say it again, just in case you yanks weren't listening the first time around.
America, land of the free.
What happened to your world leading rights and freedoms? They seem to have been waylaid by your paramilitary and political/judicial systems.
Wake up Americans and stand up for your rights and freedoms.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...

Shocking Video Of Kelly Thomas Beating Death Released. Watch With Caution.
The city surveillance video that shows a group of Fullerton police officers beating a homeless mentally ill man to death last year was finally released today, laying to rest any argument that Kelly Thomas was a threat to officers.
Or, if your soul is not so withered and your mind not so darkened, you might find it less interesting and more disturbing watching an officer of the law beat an innocent man to death.Phatscotty wrote:Interesting how a guy can go from "start punching pig" and "I'm done playin with you" to "I'M SORRY!!!!!! "I'M SORRRRYYYYYY!!!!!!!"
I don't know. Maybe I'm just cruel and jaded about the first one but I don't think this new video is comparable. To me the officers involved premeditated beating the guy. Even if they did not mean to kill him the physical damage done was not only excessive but inhumane and completly unreasonable.BigBallinStalin wrote:http://www.pixiq.com/article/shocking-v ... th-caution
Shocking Video Of Kelly Thomas Beating Death Released. Watch With Caution.The city surveillance video that shows a group of Fullerton police officers beating a homeless mentally ill man to death last year was finally released today, laying to rest any argument that Kelly Thomas was a threat to officers.
You're a fucking idiot. I hope that someday you never have to see what the pigs will do just because they can. Let's see how tough you act when a fucking truculent authoritarian who is above the law and has a gun is sitting on you, smashing your face in. The guy was homeless and schizophrenic, he obviously wasn't all there. Not only was the whole ordeal completely unnecessary, it was over the top. They could've cuffed him and let him tire himself out. Instead they had to taze him and crush his throat. There are tons of ways to restrain somebody without killing them.Phatscotty wrote:Interesting how a guy can go from "start punching pig" and "I'm done playin with you" to "I'M SORRY!!!!!! "I'M SORRRRYYYYYY!!!!!!!"
Come on, everyone knows PhatStrike's definition of "freedom" is "people should be free to do the things i think people should do"TA1LGUNN3R wrote:You're a fucking idiot. I hope that someday you never have to see what the pigs will do just because they can. Let's see how tough you act when a fucking truculent authoritarian who is above the law and has a gun is sitting on you, smashing your face in. The guy was homeless and schizophrenic, he obviously wasn't all there. Not only was the whole ordeal completely unnecessary, it was over the top. They could've cuffed him and let him tire himself out. Instead they had to taze him and crush his throat. There are tons of ways to restrain somebody without killing them.Phatscotty wrote:Interesting how a guy can go from "start punching pig" and "I'm done playin with you" to "I'M SORRY!!!!!! "I'M SORRRRYYYYYY!!!!!!!"
NSFW
And you claim to be an advocate for freedom, waving your "don't tread on me" flag around. What a whitebread motherfucker you are.
-TG

I believe that's your definition as well (to be fair).natty dread wrote:Come on, everyone knows PhatStrike's definition of "freedom" is "people should be free to do the things i think people should do"
Once more, the very definition of hypocrisy.Phatscotty wrote:Interesting how a guy can go from "start punching pig" and "I'm done playin with you" to "I'M SORRY!!!!!! "I'M SORRRRYYYYYY!!!!!!!"
My definition is "everyone should be free to do whatever as long as it causes no harm to others or impede their respective freedoms".thegreekdog wrote:I believe that's your definition as well (to be fair).natty dread wrote:Come on, everyone knows PhatStrike's definition of "freedom" is "people should be free to do the things i think people should do"

So, no more ad hominem attacks?natty dread wrote:My definition is "everyone should be free to do whatever as long as it causes no harm to others or impede their respective freedoms".thegreekdog wrote:I believe that's your definition as well (to be fair).natty dread wrote:Come on, everyone knows PhatStrike's definition of "freedom" is "people should be free to do the things i think people should do"
But hey, I guess you know what I think better than I? After all, you have so much more experience being me than I do...
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:You're a fucking idiot. I hope that someday you never have to see what the pigs will do just because they can. Let's see how tough you act when a fucking truculent authoritarian who is above the law and has a gun is sitting on you, smashing your face in. The guy was homeless and schizophrenic, he obviously wasn't all there. Not only was the whole ordeal completely unnecessary, it was over the top. They could've cuffed him and let him tire himself out. Instead they had to taze him and crush his throat. There are tons of ways to restrain somebody without killing them.Phatscotty wrote:Interesting how a guy can go from "start punching pig" and "I'm done playin with you" to "I'M SORRY!!!!!! "I'M SORRRRYYYYYY!!!!!!!"
NSFW
And you claim to be an advocate for freedom, waving your "don't tread on me" flag around. What a whitebread motherfucker you are.
-TG
or, when you ask someone to punch you, you increase the odds of being punched?Symmetry wrote:Or, if your soul is not so withered and your mind not so darkened, you might find it less interesting and more disturbing watching an officer of the law beat an innocent man to death.Phatscotty wrote:Interesting how a guy can go from "start punching pig" and "I'm done playin with you" to "I'M SORRY!!!!!! "I'M SORRRRYYYYYY!!!!!!!"
Just saying...