Moderator: Community Team


Really now? What happened to this?new guy1 wrote:Hello everybody, I just wanted to let you all know that I have read all of Day 3 so far, I have nothing else to add and think that saf's guess of Megele is a good assumtion as an SK as he is rather notorious for demented experiments and such and so have nothing to add on that point, and then I will have to go refresh my memory later when I have time as to Doom's case on me. Sorry I have nothing to add at this time and hopefully the next time I report in I will have a defense that suits doom's liking and some more to add.
Just busy?new guy1 wrote:I just had a post but got fastposted by ghost, so I guess it will be saved till tomorrow.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
I'm having a hard time understanding them as well. Well, I get why / was killed, but the 3 others murk things up. Disregarding flavour, Dazza's kill looks like a SK's job while Chuck's could have been done by either a SK or a vig. Enter flavour and we are led to believe Chuck was killed by a SK and Dazza by a vig? But how do we explain the vig firing N1 and not N2 (if he had the guts to fire N1 when there was little evidence out there, why would he refrain from N2 firing)? And why didn't the SK dissect anyone N1?DoomYoshi wrote:The kills so far have not made sense to me though.
How does posting after the night scene make me look townie? I felt like commenting so I did, it literally makes no difference one way or the other and has nothing to do with my role.DoomYoshi wrote: After night scene is posted, pmc still has comments: why? If not to look towny?
Also, pmc was vote stolen, I know that politicians often target other mafia members early on to make it look as if they are townspeople
He would be a safe target for the mafia (being a slightly suspicious claimed VT) and he is also experienced.Ragian wrote:@PMC, why did it make sense for jak to protect saf in your opinion?
Already?!Ragian wrote:Oh right ... forgot chap
Don't worry, jak remembered you so you're not forgottenchapcrap wrote:Already?!Ragian wrote:Oh right ... forgot chap
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
sorry I got lost in the maze of "and"s and "or"s so I didn't quite get to the "not" part. Ok, still waiting on your next *epic* postnew guy1 wrote:"and say I am not a vote stealer nor politician nor doublevoter nor anything that means I take a vote and use it or start with two votes."
Did you notice the "I am not a" part? haha.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
What would cause you to think there is a vote stealer and not outright state it? Now that you bring it up, it's as if you tried to cover it up.new guy1 wrote:Im sorry. I just wanted to make sure and I had to make sure that all options were up. Would if have made a difference if I had just said "Where is PMC's vote?"? As far as Im concerned I just thought outside the box and asked if there was a vote stealer, as if I didnt then he would have just said "all votes are correct" and we would have figured it out ourselves. Dont you think?