Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

^jgordon1111 wrote:b00060, you find multis's damn good.
But this one it looks like you let your emotions at the loss,override clear thought.
Looking at the chat, he wanted to make damn sure he had you in one roll and not weaken up so you might get good dice and get loose.
Yea taking the bonus rubbed you wrong, But he was playing cautious and smart.
He had a brig. on the line.
I really dont blame him for the smart playing against you.
And by talking to him the way you did,he actually seems to have ended it alot quicker than some would have.
Just an opinion,we all have them of course.
what a load of bull carp you obviously do not know trench setting very well. b006000 did not have anyway back into the game and for them 3-4 rounds he did not attack so yes this could be classed as a hostage situation i can count 5 rounds he did not attack 1 region to kill the game off but somehow he has 130 troups left surronding the area he attacked.Extreme Ways wrote:^jgordon1111 wrote:b00060, you find multis's damn good.
But this one it looks like you let your emotions at the loss,override clear thought.
Looking at the chat, he wanted to make damn sure he had you in one roll and not weaken up so you might get good dice and get loose.
Yea taking the bonus rubbed you wrong, But he was playing cautious and smart.
He had a brig. on the line.
I really dont blame him for the smart playing against you.
And by talking to him the way you did,he actually seems to have ended it alot quicker than some would have.
Just an opinion,we all have them of course.
LOL eddie I usually make sure of what I am saying before I do so.eddie2 wrote:what a load of bull carp you obviously do not know trench setting very well. b006000 did not have anyway back into the game and for them 3-4 rounds he did not attack so yes this could be classed as a hostage situation i can count 5 rounds he did not attack 1 region to kill the game off but somehow he has 130 troups left surronding the area he attacked.Extreme Ways wrote:^jgordon1111 wrote:b00060, you find multis's damn good.
But this one it looks like you let your emotions at the loss,override clear thought.
Looking at the chat, he wanted to make damn sure he had you in one roll and not weaken up so you might get good dice and get loose.
Yea taking the bonus rubbed you wrong, But he was playing cautious and smart.
He had a brig. on the line.
I really dont blame him for the smart playing against you.
And by talking to him the way you did,he actually seems to have ended it alot quicker than some would have.
Just an opinion,we all have them of course.
ps the game chat happened after stanten was messing around delaying the game.

2012-06-08 19:32:46 - David Staten received 2 troops for holding Oceania
2012-06-08 19:32:46 - David Staten received 3 troops for holding Africa
2012-06-08 19:32:46 - David Staten received 8 troops for 25 regions
sorry game was over for trench style at this point there was no comeback at round 9 so to spread that out to round 15 is a joke and a extra 30 mins. in a game that should of been finished in 10 max2012-06-08 19:33:43 - b00060: and you take another bonus, wjhat an asshole
Matter of perspective Eddie game is never over until opposing players are eliminated.eddie2 wrote:mate i did read the log this is where the first comment happened.2012-06-08 19:32:46 - David Staten received 2 troops for holding Oceania
2012-06-08 19:32:46 - David Staten received 3 troops for holding Africa
2012-06-08 19:32:46 - David Staten received 8 troops for 25 regionssorry game was over for trench style at this point there was no comeback at round 9 so to spread that out to round 15 is a joke and a extra 30 mins. in a game that should of been finished in 10 max2012-06-08 19:33:43 - b00060: and you take another bonus, wjhat an asshole

Dang Eddie I am aware it was trench I have played it before, And there is never no point of return with CC's random dice.eddie2 wrote:game was trench war jgordon this means at a certain point there is no chance of return. and that was round 9

I might have been with ya until I read... 2012-06-08 13:35:59 - b00060: fine you want to f*ck around instead of killing me you can sit and go f*ck yourselfb00060 wrote:Accused:
David Staten
The accused are suspected of:
Holding me hostage
Game number(s):
Game 11214345
You instigated in the first place.b00060 wrote:I see, I guess having a 165 men to 1 cornered for 7 rounds in a 20 game limit was playing it safe? Look at the final board, he had my single pinned in with over 130 men and I had a single and he would not kill me. Sorry, but if you defend that kind of play, then I hope others play you like that.
Its more like 2-3 rounds... 7-8 minutes since it was speed game.Jdsizzleslice wrote:And 4 rounds of not attacking is not holding hostage.
never said anything of the kind... just commented that when you talk a lot of shit in a game, sometimes things won't go smoothly after that...agentcom wrote:I love how people think that rude chat is somehow a defense to a hostage holding claim. This came up in another report a month or so ago. Hostage holding is against the rules. Period. There isn't a defense of "Well, he was calling me names." That has nothing to do with the issue.
+1 on the rebuttalrhp 1 wrote:never said anything of the kind... just commented that when you talk a lot of shit in a game, sometimes things won't go smoothly after that...agentcom wrote:I love how people think that rude chat is somehow a defense to a hostage holding claim. This came up in another report a month or so ago. Hostage holding is against the rules. Period. There isn't a defense of "Well, he was calling me names." That has nothing to do with the issue.
