R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution: Connecting the Dots

[natty dread]

Allright, who gave the Unicode character set booze?

It looks like it vomited all over the thread title...

[saxitoxin]

"People want to simplify everybody as being either good or evil. There are things between good and evil."
Rand Paul at 07:35 / Neville Chamberlain in 1938

[saxitoxin]

LMAO, Google's related searches for Rand Paul ---

[saxitoxin]

[Phatscotty]

Perhaps Rand should have just endorsed Obama....

It's Obama vs. Romney. that is the reality

[comic boy]

Perhaps Rand should have just endorsed Obama....

It's Obama vs. Romney. that is the reality

I gave you that reality some months ago , good to see you eventually grasped it.

[Phatscotty]

Perhaps Rand should have just endorsed Obama....

It's Obama vs. Romney. that is the reality

I gave you that reality some months ago , good to see you eventually grasped it.

Before it was reality?

[Woodruff]

Perhaps Rand should have just endorsed Obama....

It's Obama vs. Romney. that is the reality

I gave you that reality some months ago , good to see you eventually grasped it.

Before it was reality?

It's been a reality of Obama vs. Romney for a lot longer than you've been willing to admit, Phatscotty.

[Phatscotty]

Perhaps Rand should have just endorsed Obama....

It's Obama vs. Romney. that is the reality

I gave you that reality some months ago , good to see you eventually grasped it.

Before it was reality?

It's been a reality of Obama vs. Romney for a lot longer than you've been willing to admit, Phatscotty.

It was a prediction. Took a lot of skill and intelligence too. I have no interest in trying to pick the winner because this isn't a horse race.

I have always figured Romney was going to win the nomination, I simply supported someone else.

[comic boy]

Perhaps Rand should have just endorsed Obama....

It's Obama vs. Romney. that is the reality

I gave you that reality some months ago , good to see you eventually grasped it.

Before it was reality?

It's been a reality of Obama vs. Romney for a lot longer than you've been willing to admit, Phatscotty.

It was a prediction. Took a lot of skill and intelligence too. I have no interest in trying to pick the winner because this isn't a horse race.

I have always figured Romney was going to win the nomination, I simply supported someone else.

Thats odd because you told me that only media dupes thought that Romney was favourite , were you confused or were you lying

[Woodruff]

I have always figured Romney was going to win the nomination, I simply supported someone else.

Roll your eyes all you want, but by your own words (many, many times), this is a flat out lie. In fact, this very much goes contrary to your previous statements.

[Phatscotty]

Perhaps Rand should have just endorsed Obama....

It's Obama vs. Romney. that is the reality

I gave you that reality some months ago , good to see you eventually grasped it.

Before it was reality?

It's been a reality of Obama vs. Romney for a lot longer than you've been willing to admit, Phatscotty.

It was a prediction. Took a lot of skill and intelligence too. I have no interest in trying to pick the winner because this isn't a horse race.

I have always figured Romney was going to win the nomination, I simply supported someone else.

Thats odd because you told me that only media dupes thought that Romney was favourite , were you confused or were you lying

Show me that quote, and we will see who is lying.

[comic boy]

You are lying , I know it , Woody knows it and so do you. If I spend the time getting quotes as evidence you will either ignore them or try to twist them , nothing changes , you are quite happy to be dishonest rather than admit error . For the life of me I cant see why you think it is admirable to behave that way , self confidence issues I would guess , all bluster but no substance

[Phatscotty]

I have said all along, I will figure out who and what (for me personally) around the time of the convention. That is in August

For now, it seems "audit the Fed" is going to be in Romney's platform.

It's going to be up to the Ron Paul delegates at the Convention to force the issue.

And force it we will!

[Woodruff]

I gave you that reality some months ago , good to see you eventually grasped it.

Before it was reality?

It's been a reality of Obama vs. Romney for a lot longer than you've been willing to admit, Phatscotty.

It was a prediction. Took a lot of skill and intelligence too. I have no interest in trying to pick the winner because this isn't a horse race.

I have always figured Romney was going to win the nomination, I simply supported someone else.

Thats odd because you told me that only media dupes thought that Romney was favourite , were you confused or were you lying

Show me that quote, and we will see who is lying.

Phatscotty, we've shown you your own quotes so often (which you have ALWAYS ignored) that you've taken to editing your posts so that those quotes "disappear". Why do you think nobody gives you any credit for anything nor thinks you have any integrity?

[comic boy]

To be fair one shouldn't expect too much from a third rate troll.

[Woodruff]

To be fair one shouldn't expect too much from a third rate troll.

According to the moderators, Phatscotty does not troll. I have been told this numerous times, and once quite recently. <sigh>

[comic boy]

To be fair one shouldn't expect too much from a third rate troll.

According to the moderators, Phatscotty does not troll. I have been told this numerous times, and once quite recently. <sigh>

I humbly suggest that they may be mistaken on certain occasions.

[Woodruff]

To be fair one shouldn't expect too much from a third rate troll.

According to the moderators, Phatscotty does not troll. I have been told this numerous times, and once quite recently. <sigh>

I humbly suggest that they may be mistaken on certain occasions.

I don't know how you could possibly think such a thing of such a fine, upstanding poster as our Phatscotty.

[Phatscotty]

Obsessed with me much? How do you pull off making 30 posts in a thread, never talking about the issue in the thread, and trolling and flaming people all the way through?

Btw, it's clear you are clueless as to what trolling is, which is why you do it so often. I always stay on topic, I never make inflammatory comments or call people names. You on the other hand are an exact match for the definition given below.

a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[3] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

anyways, what I wanted to post here after having to deal with all this off topic derailing and trolling BS...

[Woodruff]

Btw, it's clear you are clueless as to what trolling is, which is why you do it so often.

There are a lot more people calling you a troll than are calling me one, Phatscotty.

I always stay on topic,

Is this post of yours on-topic?

I never make inflammatory comments or call people names.

There are many more things a troll can do than those. Your typical tactic is to ask for information (hoping it won't be presented) and then ignoring it when it is. Ignoring any serious counter-argument to your statements is right up there, as well. You troll via the dodge.

Meanwhile, you claim to have foed me yet continue to respond to my posts by calling me a troll. I guess the foe function is broken far worse than I thought.

[Phatscotty]

Btw, it's clear you are clueless as to what trolling is, which is why you do it so often.

I always stay on topic.

Is this post of yours on-topic?

Yes it was on topic. And if you didn't take out what part of the post that was on topic, then you would answer your own trolling question, and you wouldn't be being purposefully annoying. I gave you the definition of trolling. If you want to add on a bunch of things into the definition that aren't in the definition, well that would be totally typical of you.

Busted