[CC3] PACK vs RA {34-7} - Final 7/14

jordy2425 · Post by **jordy2425** » Sun May 27, 2012 8:30 pm

Game 11134708
Joined and started within minutes, i can assume what happened here since no regions were taken.
However if its agreed upon, I would like everyone to follow rule. So there are no complaints in the future too

lynch5762 · Post by **lynch5762** » Tue May 29, 2012 12:10 am

For the record, there is not a 12 hour fog rule in affect for CC3.

There can be a "gentleman's agreement" amongst clans but with no ramifications. I think that both sides have been pretty decent about giving the other side a chance for a snapshot so I'm sure this was an oversight.

I have to agree with Ollie's earlier post that RA has improved a bunch since the last time we met! Please don't take that in a bad way.. I am just saying that I am also impressed with the game strategy in the games that I am in!

Good luck in the rest of the games.

Janomike · Post by **Janomike** » Tue May 29, 2012 2:50 am

I also think that this was an oversight, sorry!

Thanx for the compliments but i would still like to see us win more of our games.
There is alot we need to learn, we still dont have enough players who can lead a game and we have problems with trips and quads
due to a lack of maps we already trained/played and a lack of teamplaying practice. But we are very motivated and willing to learn
so expect us to improve in the clan ranking soon. We are doing well in Division 5 of the CL so far, i really hope that we will be able to win it.

oh and BTW we have to change our strategy from now on!
As the ICL has been cancelled our new plans go toward winning against you to continue playing in CC3.

Hope you dont mind!

Enjoying the games against you! Good luck for the rest of the games!

Mike

VioIet · Post by **VioIet** » Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:44 pm

betiko wrote:
Great-Ollie wrote:I just felt i needed to say Violet is doing a great job with this clan! They are greatly improved since the last time we met and i have a feeling they have a lot of improving to do still. Good job RA you are not making this easy on us and it is fun to have some good competition!
i m gonna lose at least half of my games from this first batch.. yep, you guys have improved a lot since last time (was it a couple of month ago?)

Thank you very much Ollie, Betiko and Lynch and others who have made nice comments about RA. We are a very different clan from a year ago or even 6 months ago. This war shows us how much we need to work on, however I am still very proud of my clanmates thus far.

It's been a privilege playing against The Pack. We are just doing what we can to prevent this from being a blow-out

betiko · Post by **betiko** » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:07 am

looks like we need 4 more wins to make it official!

grifftron · Post by **grifftron** » Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:35 am

Game 11134734 - #21 here, seals the victory for the pack.

1 game left in the first round and still a whiles off until round 2 games are complete.

betiko · Post by **betiko** » Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:43 am

well played RA, good luck in your future wars!

freakns · Post by **freakns** » Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:12 pm

congrats PACK! see you ladeis in quarters if you get past ID

grifftron · Post by **grifftron** » Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:33 am

freakns wrote:congrats PACK! see you ladeis in quarters if you get past ID

You mean IF you guys get past TOFU

freakns · Post by **freakns** » Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:21 am

grifftron wrote:
freakns wrote:congrats PACK! see you ladeis in quarters if you get past ID
You mean IF you guys get past TOFU

there is no IF, only WHEN!

grifftron · Post by **grifftron** » Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:38 am

freakns wrote:
grifftron wrote:
freakns wrote:congrats PACK! see you ladeis in quarters if you get past ID
You mean IF you guys get past TOFU
there is no IF, only WHEN!

I'll be watching, and wishing! I would prefer to play you guys over TOFU any day, so I am cheering for you guys!

freakns · Post by **freakns** » Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:09 am

be careful what you wish for!

John Deere · Post by **John Deere** » Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:03 am

Well played RA! You have came a long way. Sure we will meet you down the road again

betiko · Post by **betiko** » Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:30 am

freakns wrote:be careful what you wish for!

are all second rounds of the cc3 supposed to start at the same time?

freakns · Post by **freakns** » Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:34 am

betiko wrote:
freakns wrote:be careful what you wish for!
are all second rounds of the cc3 supposed to start at the same time?

not sure, but i think not... FOED and OSA already started, and Dynasty and Legion will be the last one finishing first round. they have only started 20 games of first round so far

grifftron · Post by **grifftron** » Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:31 pm

4 games left, 3 leaning towards Pack and 1 leaning toward RA (Oddly that one is one of our strong maps).

Final prediction is 33-8

-griff

Janomike · Post by **Janomike** » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:53 am

The result is much worse than i hoped for, the overall game load with CL4 was too high for us to be true.

Lost some games that were close especially the Canada trip which hurts me most but our most striking problem is that you guys are just too good

Congrats!

Hope we will meet again soon.

Mike

betiko · Post by **betiko** » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:13 am

Janomike wrote:The result is much worse than i hoped for, the overall game load with CL4 was too high for us to be true.

Lost some games that were close especially the Canada trip which hurts me most but our most striking problem is that you guys are just too good

Congrats!

Hope we will meet again soon.

Mike

yeah we had some problems here too with cl4 games giving us a big load of clan games at the same time.. you guys didn't manage to be as dangerous on round 2 as you were on round 1 i have to say...

grifftron · Post by **grifftron** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:10 pm

2 games left.

lynch5762 · Post by **lynch5762** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:40 pm

Janomike wrote:The result is much worse than i hoped for, the overall game load with CL4 was too high for us to be true.

Lost some games that were close especially the Canada trip which hurts me most but our most striking problem is that you guys are just too good

Congrats!

Hope we will meet again soon.

Mike

Thanks Mike.... keep plugging away guys you have made big strides! As betiko said, the first round had us a bit worried.

Gl in future endeavors!

grifftron · Post by **grifftron** » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:22 am

Game 11134742 - Stalingrad

last game.

betiko · Post by **betiko** » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:31 am

come on guys still not done with that last game?

tec805 · Post by **tec805** » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:01 pm

betiko wrote:come on guys still not done with that last game?

They fought long and hard, almost had us a couple times. Good game! (and it's almost over)

GeneralRisk · Post by **GeneralRisk** » Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:47 pm

tec805 wrote:
betiko wrote:come on guys still not done with that last game?
They fought long and hard, almost had us a couple times. Good game! (and it's almost over)

Game over...I killed a beautiful woman to end game.

VioIet · Post by **VioIet** » Sun Jul 15, 2012 4:36 pm

GeneralRisk wrote:
Game over...I killed a beautiful woman to end game.

Well...when you put it that way, I don't mind so much

Good Job Pack! I'm not at all surprised by the results, but I was hoping that RA could put up a much better fight. It seems like many of the individual games were closer than what the score indicates. I agree that we didn't play so well in Round 2 - in fact- I don't think we won a single game in Round 2.

I'm going to be following you guys closely in this CC3. I really want to see you challenge one of the big three (TOFU, TSM, KORT). There is no denying after this war, that you guys have to be a Top 3 clan.

I would love to see a KORT vs PACK for the finals.

[CC3] PACK vs RA {34-7} - Final 7/14

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {8-3}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {10-4}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {10-4}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {6-1}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {17-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {21-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {21-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {25-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {25-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {25-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {25-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {27-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {27-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {27-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {27-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {30-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {30-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {30-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {32-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {30-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {33-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {33-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {33-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {33-7}

Re: [CC3] PACK vs RA {33-7}