ObamaCare - exchanges ,report your states options!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Juan_Bottom »

Phatscotty wrote: If you need to label me one way or another, just mark me down with whatever you think Ron Paul is
DONE

Image
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Juan_Bottom »



OBAMACARE 2012
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Phatscotty »

Juan_Bottom wrote:Mostly for privacy.
I'm paying her mortgage and my sister is in college. We're all that's left. My mom is out of work, partially because she's sick. Partially because she lives in an area known as a black hole of job growth. And the mortgage costs me half my monthly earnings, so I can't participate in life a whole lot.
Obamacare is probably her best and only hope.

I need a revolution. =(
best and only hope for what though? And about privacy, then I would wonder why you even brought your mom into this...
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Phatscotty »

Juan_Bottom wrote: Image
ROT IN HELL!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Juan_Bottom »

Phatscotty wrote: And about privacy, then I would wonder why you even brought your mom into this...
Image
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Phatscotty »

dodge n weave son, dodge n weave....

tell Saul Alinksy we said hi
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Juan_Bottom »

Image
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Woodruff »

Phatscotty wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:That's PS gift. He's for the Conservatives, but somehow is against them. . . and I never know what card he's going to play. Sometimes I don't even think the card is from the right deck. We're playing Polish Poker and he passes me the old maid. He's unpredictable, mostly. But for the Conservatives.
That is easier to swallow if you could accept that I am an Independent.
I don't think there's a single individual in these fora that honestly believes you're an Independent. Some may say so because they want to back up one of their own, but I really don't believe they honestly think that. I know I certainly don't. Hell, I can't think of anything you've said in these fora that wasn't Conservobot in nature. It's like me trying to convince the fora that I'm a Catholic. In fact, I would suggest to you that I've made more statements in these fora that are in favor of Christianity than you have made that are in favor of liberal policies and I don't think anyone's mistaking me for a religious individual.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
GreecePwns
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Lawn Guy Lint

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by GreecePwns »

An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
User avatar
comic boy
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: London

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by comic boy »

I assume he means independent of integrity or truth, that adds up.
Im a TOFU miSfit
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Woodruff »

GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
And apparently, being paid to speak by the Tea Party.
Last edited by Woodruff on Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Woodruff »

comic boy wrote:I assume he means independent of integrity or truth, that adds up.
Image
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Phatscotty »

GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
the RON PAUL controlled GOP delegation of Minnesota ;) But, as you very well know, Ron Paul is just your stereotypical neo-con Republican, and is no where near "Independent". :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Phatscotty »

Woodruff wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
And apparently, being paid to speak by the Tea Party.
The Tea Party is closer to the center than it is the right. For every 10 tea party members, 4 are Republican, 5 are independent or Libertarian, and 1 is a Democrat. But, even after all these years Woodruff, and all your talk about the Tea Party, you still don't accept it for what it is, and have not begun to try to understand either, a lot like trolling.
User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by john9blue »

Juan_Bottom wrote:Image
so i take it you're voting for romney?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Phatscotty »

Juan_Bottom wrote:Image
It's time for Juan Bottom to learn the difference between a state program and a federal program

tehee
spurgistan
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by spurgistan »

john9blue wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:Image
so i take it you're voting for romney?
Why would you want to vote for somebody who's running against his biggest legislative success?
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Phatscotty »

spurgistan wrote:
john9blue wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:Image
so i take it you're voting for romney?
Why would you want to vote for somebody who's running against his biggest legislative success?
state programs and national programs are 2 different things. and I don't want to vote for Romney. Romney is not running against romneycare, from what I have seen he is embracing and defending it.

To explain John's hilarious observation....what JB's pic presents is that Romney is the father of OBamacare, so if you like OBamacare....vote for Romney!
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Juan_Bottom »

Hilariously, that notorious flip-flopper Romney has said that he wants to repeal the parts of Obamacare that pay for Obamacare. He'd change it from a revenue-saving program into a deficit program.

Pay attention people. This isn't new and everyone made fun of him for this.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Woodruff »

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
And apparently, being paid to speak by the Tea Party.
The Tea Party is closer to the center than it is the right. For every 10 tea party members, 4 are Republican, 5 are independent or Libertarian, and 1 is a Democrat. But, even after all these years Woodruff, and all your talk about the Tea Party, you still don't accept it for what it is, and have not begun to try to understand either, a lot like trolling.
I recognize the Tea Party for what it is. I was a part of the Tea Party when it started out. Then it became absorbed into the right-wing machine, and I lost interest in being a part of it. I still believe the Tea Party could have been a great thing for this nation, but I would suggest to you that trying to play like the Tea Party ISN'T now a part of the right-wing is disengenuous at best, and more likely downright dishonest.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Night Strike
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Night Strike »

Juan_Bottom wrote:Hilariously, that notorious flip-flopper Romney has said that he wants to repeal the parts of Obamacare that pay for Obamacare. He'd change it from a revenue-saving program into a deficit program.

Pay attention people. This isn't new and everyone made fun of him for this.
It's not saving any revenue right now anyway, so your argument is disingenuous.

Woodruff wrote:I recognize the Tea Party for what it is. I was a part of the Tea Party when it started out. Then it became absorbed into the right-wing machine, and I lost interest in being a part of it. I still believe the Tea Party could have been a great thing for this nation, but I would suggest to you that trying to play like the Tea Party ISN'T now a part of the right-wing is disengenuous at best, and more likely downright dishonest.
Why wouldn't the Tea Party be right-wing? The left-wing wants to perpetually grow the federal government into an unsustainable monstrosity. Heck, we can't even sustain our current spending. It's only conservatives and libertarians who are even trying to reign in the spending. The Tea Party is a crucial part of achieving that goal.
Image
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Juan_Bottom »

Night Strike wrote:It's not saving any revenue right now anyway, so your argument is disingenuous.
I didn't say that it would save money today. But everyone except the Republican nutters acknowledge that it will save a shit-ton of money for our nation. So your argument is disingenuous. There's no debate about this here.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Woodruff »

Night Strike wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:Hilariously, that notorious flip-flopper Romney has said that he wants to repeal the parts of Obamacare that pay for Obamacare. He'd change it from a revenue-saving program into a deficit program.

Pay attention people. This isn't new and everyone made fun of him for this.
It's not saving any revenue right now anyway, so your argument is disingenuous.

Woodruff wrote:I recognize the Tea Party for what it is. I was a part of the Tea Party when it started out. Then it became absorbed into the right-wing machine, and I lost interest in being a part of it. I still believe the Tea Party could have been a great thing for this nation, but I would suggest to you that trying to play like the Tea Party ISN'T now a part of the right-wing is disengenuous at best, and more likely downright dishonest.
Why wouldn't the Tea Party be right-wing?
There is absolutely no reason for the basic Tea Party ideals to be left-wing or right-wing. None. Zero. Zilch.

Unfortunately, the Tea Party started moving into the realm of abortion and issues like that, which really had no place for them. That's when the Tea Party was absorbed by the right-wing.
Woodruff wrote:The left-wing wants to perpetually grow the federal government into an unsustainable monstrosity.
That really isn't true, necessarily. Do you get all of your information from propoganda?
Woodruff wrote:Heck, we can't even sustain our current spending. It's only conservatives and libertarians who are even trying to reign in the spending. The Tea Party is a crucial part of achieving that goal.
The Tea Party has become a mockery of what it started out as.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Night Strike
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Night Strike »

Juan_Bottom wrote:
Night Strike wrote:It's not saving any revenue right now anyway, so your argument is disingenuous.
I didn't say that it would save money today. But everyone except the Republican nutters acknowledge that it will save a shit-ton of money for our nation. So your argument is disingenuous. There's no debate about this here.
There's no debate about it because the claims aren't true, so people don't waste their time discussing it. This law increases federal spending on health care and does nothing to improve the system to make private insurance costs go down. The only way they even claimed that the law decreased federal spending on health care is because it forced states to pay for the Medicaid expansions, but then the Supreme Court threw out those portions.

Woodruff wrote:
Night Strike wrote:The left-wing wants to perpetually grow the federal government into an unsustainable monstrosity.
That really isn't true, necessarily. Do you get all of your information from propoganda?
It's not propaganda when it's true. Just look at what the government is actually doing. Progressives want to expand the government in every avenue possible, no matter what the costs are. If they aren't making enough money to pay for it, they demand that "the rich" give even more money to the government to pay for it. They don't question whether a program is good or beneficial (muchless even trying to figure out if it's Constitutional) while going to enact it anyway.
Image
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ObamaCare: Reactions

Post by Phatscotty »

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
And apparently, being paid to speak by the Tea Party.
The Tea Party is closer to the center than it is the right. For every 10 tea party members, 4 are Republican, 5 are independent or Libertarian, and 1 is a Democrat. But, even after all these years Woodruff, and all your talk about the Tea Party, you still don't accept it for what it is, and have not begun to try to understand either, a lot like trolling.
I recognize the Tea Party for what it is. I was a part of the Tea Party when it started out. Then it became absorbed into the right-wing machine, and I lost interest in being a part of it. I still believe the Tea Party could have been a great thing for this nation, but I would suggest to you that trying to play like the Tea Party ISN'T now a part of the right-wing is disengenuous at best, and more likely downright dishonest.
You were part of the Tea Party.....until you bought the media bullshit about it.

The only place I can agree with you is that we are fiscally on the right, and when it comes to civil liberties we are on the left, and with the military we are in the center. That's how many independents are as well. There were more than a few instances where the Tea Party sided with the Democrats over Republicans in the last few years, and many more instances of the Republicans joining the Democrats to block the Tea Party. That doesn't seem right wing to me....
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”