Moderator: Community Team



Yeah, this was my first thought too. It'll be interesting to see the long term effect of this move.spurgistan wrote:I gotta say, a fast-food chain promoting a pro-bigot agenda is not a terrible business strategy. Even if you're only appealing to the ~30% of the population that just really doesn't like gay people and wants them to stop being all gay (this isn't just about marriage, they support Pray Away the Gay. which is just downright destructive) being the Official Fast Food of Bigots (tm) should get them some solid market share. While as a fan of American values I will never buy Chik-Fil-A food again (I have, three times. It's pretty good chicken) I can respect a solid business move.
I heard about this. I am not surprised the response is "let's physically throw it in their face".MudPuppy wrote:Enjoyed my peach shake so much on Tuesday, I'm headed back tomorrow for another during the Kiss-In:
How are they physically throwing anything in "their" face? Surely you're ok with people kissing in a restaurant?Phatscotty wrote:I heard about this. I am not surprised the response is "let's physically throw it in their face".MudPuppy wrote:Enjoyed my peach shake so much on Tuesday, I'm headed back tomorrow for another during the Kiss-In:
However, can they do this? I ask because Chik-fil-a is not public property. Can you really take over a private business and interfere with commerce like that? Are they actually going inside the business, even though they aren't going to buy anything? What will this accomplish? How will it help their cause?
Anyone know more about this?
We each play our part. I'm following Scotty's points so that he doesn't seem so ridiculous. I'll be physically throwing lesbian couples at the faces of shop staff.Army of GOD wrote:I'm sorry but I'm not kissing a guy. I'll watch two hot girls kiss each other though.
I think it'd be hilarious if a bunch of couples bought food and then made out for like 3 minutes right in front of the cash register.Symmetry wrote:We each play our part. I'm following Scotty's points so that he doesn't seem so ridiculous. I'll be physically throwing lesbian couples at the faces of shop staff.Army of GOD wrote:I'm sorry but I'm not kissing a guy. I'll watch two hot girls kiss each other though.
....drenched in gravyArmy of GOD wrote:I think it'd be hilarious if a bunch of couples bought food and then made out for like 3 minutes right in front of the cash register.Symmetry wrote:We each play our part. I'm following Scotty's points so that he doesn't seem so ridiculous. I'll be physically throwing lesbian couples at the faces of shop staff.Army of GOD wrote:I'm sorry but I'm not kissing a guy. I'll watch two hot girls kiss each other though.
Um...because they are physically going to chik-fil-a and making it a plan to kiss each other, in front of everyone's faces? wtf?Symmetry wrote:How are they physically throwing anything in "their" face? Surely you're ok with people kissing in a restaurant?Phatscotty wrote:I heard about this. I am not surprised the response is "let's physically throw it in their face".MudPuppy wrote:Enjoyed my peach shake so much on Tuesday, I'm headed back tomorrow for another during the Kiss-In:
However, can they do this? I ask because Chik-fil-a is not public property. Can you really take over a private business and interfere with commerce like that? Are they actually going inside the business, even though they aren't going to buy anything? What will this accomplish? How will it help their cause?
Anyone know more about this?
So, they're not actually physically throwing anything. Which was my point to deflate your hyperbole. I see that it's deflated you a little, but some of your hot air remains.Phatscotty wrote:Um...because they are physically going to chik-fil-a and making it a plan to kiss each other, in front of everyone's faces? wtf?Symmetry wrote:How are they physically throwing anything in "their" face? Surely you're ok with people kissing in a restaurant?Phatscotty wrote:I heard about this. I am not surprised the response is "let's physically throw it in their face".MudPuppy wrote:Enjoyed my peach shake so much on Tuesday, I'm headed back tomorrow for another during the Kiss-In:
However, can they do this? I ask because Chik-fil-a is not public property. Can you really take over a private business and interfere with commerce like that? Are they actually going inside the business, even though they aren't going to buy anything? What will this accomplish? How will it help their cause?
Anyone know more about this?What do you think the point of this is??
of course you can kiss in the restaurant. You think that's that point?![]()
but.....to intentionally go to a restaurant, just to kiss? I'm asking what that will achieve, how it will help the cause. Care to take another swing? And yes, it's the most romantic place to plan to kiss at.....a fast food restaurant?
This is bizarro
You think Chik-fil-a is a public business???????????Symmetry wrote:So, they're not actually physically throwing anything. Which was my point to deflate your hyperbole. I see that it's deflated you a little, but some of your hot air remains.Phatscotty wrote:Um...because they are physically going to chik-fil-a and making it a plan to kiss each other, in front of everyone's faces? wtf?Symmetry wrote:How are they physically throwing anything in "their" face? Surely you're ok with people kissing in a restaurant?Phatscotty wrote:I heard about this. I am not surprised the response is "let's physically throw it in their face".MudPuppy wrote:Enjoyed my peach shake so much on Tuesday, I'm headed back tomorrow for another during the Kiss-In:
However, can they do this? I ask because Chik-fil-a is not public property. Can you really take over a private business and interfere with commerce like that? Are they actually going inside the business, even though they aren't going to buy anything? What will this accomplish? How will it help their cause?
Anyone know more about this?What do you think the point of this is??
of course you can kiss in the restaurant. You think that's that point?![]()
but.....to intentionally go to a restaurant, just to kiss? I'm asking what that will achieve, how it will help the cause. Care to take another swing? And yes, it's the most romantic place to plan to kiss at.....a fast food restaurant?
This is bizarro
I'd say good on them for making a protest, and doing so in a peaceful loving manner. I don't see any reasonable objection to that. Indeed the only objection seems to be that gay folk shouldn't be seen kissing in public, and that is unreasonable.
Ugh, there went my irony-meter again. I should just give up now, because I seem to break one every time I read a PS post.Phatscotty wrote:South Park already did an episode about this. All the bikers wanted to do was make a bunch of noise and make everyone look at them because they need to be the center of attention.
May I just say the creators of South Park are geniuses
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Dodge master...Symmetry wrote:So, they're not actually physically throwing anything. Which was my point to deflate your hyperbole. I see that it's deflated you a little, but some of your hot air remains.Phatscotty wrote:Um...because they are physically going to chik-fil-a and making it a plan to kiss each other, in front of everyone's faces? wtf?Symmetry wrote:How are they physically throwing anything in "their" face? Surely you're ok with people kissing in a restaurant?Phatscotty wrote:I heard about this. I am not surprised the response is "let's physically throw it in their face".MudPuppy wrote:Enjoyed my peach shake so much on Tuesday, I'm headed back tomorrow for another during the Kiss-In:
However, can they do this? I ask because Chik-fil-a is not public property. Can you really take over a private business and interfere with commerce like that? Are they actually going inside the business, even though they aren't going to buy anything? What will this accomplish? How will it help their cause?
Anyone know more about this?What do you think the point of this is??
of course you can kiss in the restaurant. You think that's that point?![]()
but.....to intentionally go to a restaurant, just to kiss? I'm asking what that will achieve, how it will help the cause. Care to take another swing? And yes, it's the most romantic place to plan to kiss at.....a fast food restaurant?
This is bizarro
I'd say good on them for making a protest, and doing so in a peaceful loving manner. I don't see any reasonable objection to that. Indeed the only objection seems to be that gay folk shouldn't be seen kissing in public, and that is unreasonable.
If it has no meaning, why are you so viscerally opposed to it?Phatscotty wrote:Dodge master...Symmetry wrote:So, they're not actually physically throwing anything. Which was my point to deflate your hyperbole. I see that it's deflated you a little, but some of your hot air remains.
I'd say good on them for making a protest, and doing so in a peaceful loving manner. I don't see any reasonable objection to that. Indeed the only objection seems to be that gay folk shouldn't be seen kissing in public, and that is unreasonable.
what will the kiss in accomplish? How will it help the cause?![]()
![]()
Then why is it "good for them"? Why "protest" if "it doesn't mean anything"? how bizarreSymmetry wrote:If it has no meaning, why are you so viscerally opposed to it?Phatscotty wrote:Dodge master...Symmetry wrote:So, they're not actually physically throwing anything. Which was my point to deflate your hyperbole. I see that it's deflated you a little, but some of your hot air remains.
I'd say good on them for making a protest, and doing so in a peaceful loving manner. I don't see any reasonable objection to that. Indeed the only objection seems to be that gay folk shouldn't be seen kissing in public, and that is unreasonable.
what will the kiss in accomplish? How will it help the cause?
You should give it a go. Maybe you'll meet the man of your Freudian dreams.Phatscotty wrote:Then why is it "good for them"? Why "protest" if "it doesn't mean anything"? how bizarreSymmetry wrote:If it has no meaning, why are you so viscerally opposed to it?Phatscotty wrote:Dodge master...Symmetry wrote:So, they're not actually physically throwing anything. Which was my point to deflate your hyperbole. I see that it's deflated you a little, but some of your hot air remains.
I'd say good on them for making a protest, and doing so in a peaceful loving manner. I don't see any reasonable objection to that. Indeed the only objection seems to be that gay folk shouldn't be seen kissing in public, and that is unreasonable.
what will the kiss in accomplish? How will it help the cause?
How could I be opposed to it when I clearly don't even understand what its purpose is or why? All I have been asking about is trying to understand it. All you have been doing is dodging and trolling.
Sounds like the Kiss-in is gonna be a giant Troll-in!
I wish I could. Maybe they would know what the hell they were talking about, because you are just useless!Symmetry wrote:You should give it a go. Maybe you'll meet the man of your Freudian dreams.Phatscotty wrote:Then why is it "good for them"? Why "protest" if "it doesn't mean anything"? how bizarreSymmetry wrote:If it has no meaning, why are you so viscerally opposed to it?Phatscotty wrote:Dodge master...Symmetry wrote:So, they're not actually physically throwing anything. Which was my point to deflate your hyperbole. I see that it's deflated you a little, but some of your hot air remains.
I'd say good on them for making a protest, and doing so in a peaceful loving manner. I don't see any reasonable objection to that. Indeed the only objection seems to be that gay folk shouldn't be seen kissing in public, and that is unreasonable.
what will the kiss in accomplish? How will it help the cause?
How could I be opposed to it when I clearly don't even understand what its purpose is or why? All I have been asking about is trying to understand it. All you have been doing is dodging and trolling.
Sounds like the Kiss-in is gonna be a giant Troll-in!
"Peck on the cheek/lips", I'm ok with. Making out...I'm not ok with in a restaurant, whether they're homosexual or heterosexual.Symmetry wrote:How are they physically throwing anything in "their" face? Surely you're ok with people kissing in a restaurant?