what did you have on him Jak,it might do for his replacement to be able to explain some things.jak111 wrote:>:O You would take a good case away from meCampin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying
Moderator: Community Team
what did you have on him Jak,it might do for his replacement to be able to explain some things.jak111 wrote:>:O You would take a good case away from meCampin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying

OH! Uh.... -commences dramatic death, cursing jak for foiling him and promising to get revenge....-jgordon1111 wrote:what did you have on him Jak,it might do for his replacement to be able to explain some things.jak111 wrote:>:O You would take a good case away from meCampin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying
His inactivity.jgordon1111 wrote:what did you have on him Jak,it might do for his replacement to be able to explain some things.jak111 wrote:>:O You would take a good case away from meCampin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying
IB is correct. Count's inactivity could have been a sign of him laying low.. but of course he is getting replaced right when that case is made ~Facepalm~Iron Butterfly wrote:His inactivity.jgordon1111 wrote:what did you have on him Jak,it might do for his replacement to be able to explain some things.jak111 wrote:>:O You would take a good case away from meCampin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying

vodean wrote:well i guess my vote came after deadline...

Which brings me to the main point about the post that you skipped. You brought your vote back in hoping the deadline already passed.vodean wrote:well im pretty sure i voted NoS earlier. i unvoted him because i thought that some of the other cases seemed more promising, but then i changed my vote back so that we would at least get a lynch. and look how it turned out! i hardly think that scum would hammer their scum-buddy when they could just wait 10 minutes.
actually, i only noticed that later, which is why i posted it.jak111 wrote:Which brings me to the main point about the post that you skipped. You brought your vote back in hoping the deadline already passed.vodean wrote:well im pretty sure i voted NoS earlier. i unvoted him because i thought that some of the other cases seemed more promising, but then i changed my vote back so that we would at least get a lynch. and look how it turned out! i hardly think that scum would hammer their scum-buddy when they could just wait 10 minutes.

You are correct IB, I did investigate jonty and despite what my role says, I got no results, I have asked CK about it,and he said no results which to me would indicate I got blocked. otherwise my thought are whoever killed jonty is the only mafia left and has a joat type role.Iron Butterfly wrote:There are to many people not playing.
I would be curious as to what jgordons investigation revealed. he stated he was a forensics investigator. I would assume he tried to investigate jonty.



Why do you believe he is the only mafia left and has a joat type role?jgordon1111 wrote:You are correct IB, I did investigate jonty and despite what my role says, I got no results, I have asked CK about it,and he said no results which to me would indicate I got blocked. otherwise my thought are whoever killed jonty is the only mafia left and has a joat type role.Iron Butterfly wrote:There are to many people not playing.
I would be curious as to what jgordons investigation revealed. he stated he was a forensics investigator. I would assume he tried to investigate jonty.
Sometimes it's the caution that get us killed. If we're too afraid to lynch the fake claiming docs, cops, JOAT's, etc. Then we're never going to see through mafia fake claims. You play on caution, I play on everybody is fair game until we start getting confirmations.Iron Butterfly wrote:I played on the side of caution.
Iron Butterfly wrote:Why do you believe he is the only mafia left and has a joat type role?jgordon1111 wrote:You are correct IB, I did investigate jonty and despite what my role says, I got no results, I have asked CK about it,and he said no results which to me would indicate I got blocked. otherwise my thought are whoever killed jonty is the only mafia left and has a joat type role.Iron Butterfly wrote:There are to many people not playing.
I would be curious as to what jgordons investigation revealed. he stated he was a forensics investigator. I would assume he tried to investigate jonty.

Being over confident is just as bad. Getting lucky doesn't make you a mafia killer.jak111 wrote:Sometimes it's the caution that get us killed. If we're too afraid to lynch the fake claiming docs, cops, JOAT's, etc. Then we're never going to see through mafia fake claims. You play on caution, I play on everybody is fair game until we start getting confirmations.Iron Butterfly wrote:I played on the side of caution.
Imbalance? 3 mafia out of 11 players... you could have 3 mafia with 9 players (1/3 rule) No.. there's definitely two mafia left bud.jgordon1111 wrote: speculation IB,its a small game 3 mafia would be kind of overdoing it most likely, and per the last scene,somebody got grabbed,mafia tried to make a kill but it didnt work out,and I got a no result on what should have been a sure thing,which means I got blocked.
So I am figuring 2 things cult,joat or game slight imbalance with 3 mafia. anyone else with anything.