comic boy wrote:Wow the Kid can tell me to f*ck off using the anonymity of the internet , what a brave little boy he is ! Anyway when you have got over your little tantrum try adding up ALL of Phat hypocrites Obama threads , can you count that high ?
how many would you estimate he's made, over obama's 4 years?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Timminz wrote:79. 79 threads that contain the word "Obama" in either the title or the first post.
...all on page 1......
btw, Pimpdave holds the record, with 113 Tea Party/Republican threads in less than 90 days. Did that bother you guys earlier this year?
However, there is actually a point to be made here. What all this shows is that Leftists are not defending any Obama policies, or even talking policy at all. They are taking the path of baselessly accusing everyone and anyone who does not vote for Obama of whatever is convenient at the time.
Timminz wrote:79. 79 threads that contain the word "Obama" in either the title or the first post.
...all on page 1......
You can add whatever qualifier you like, but it won't change the question I was answering, nor does it change the answer to that question.
Phatscotty wrote:btw, Pimpdave holds the record, with 113 Tea Party/Republican threads in less than 90 days. Did that bother you guys earlier this year?
Are you really trying to compare yourself to someone who is on yet another 3-month ban?
Phatscotty wrote:You guys are listening to the words of politicians at the worst possible time.....
There are better things to do than get bent out of shape everyday because of what some jackass who is trying to get elected is trying to say to get elected.
Seriously, if saying stupid things is a reason to bash Romney and judge him as stupid and not vote for him, then you can't vote for Obama either, because he says stupid things toO
New Thread: ZOMG Obama doesn't know there are 50 states!!!!!!!! WHAT AN IDIOT! How can you possibly vote for him?
You seem particularly desperate.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Phatscotty wrote:Yes, you guys are bent all out of shape over the dumbest crap, only seeking some kind of self-esteem reassurance building excersize and a convenient scapegoat for all your problems.
I love it when you say these things. It makes your lack of self-reflection so bloody apparent.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
comic boy wrote:Somebody remind me how many Obama threads have been started by the Phat hypocrite
romney threads on the front page: "Romney.. hit new hypocritic high " "Romneyshambles releases short-form tax info " "Mitt Romney Scandals " "Romney and Obama: Is There Any Difference? " "Rmoney and Taxes "
obama threads: "Romney and Obama: Is There Any Difference? "
kindly f*ck off
or "bugger off" as they say in your land of inferiority complexes
You do realize you didn't in any way answer his question, right?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
comic boy wrote:Somebody remind me how many Obama threads have been started by the Phat hypocrite
romney threads on the front page: "Romney.. hit new hypocritic high " "Romneyshambles releases short-form tax info " "Mitt Romney Scandals " "Romney and Obama: Is There Any Difference? " "Rmoney and Taxes "
obama threads: "Romney and Obama: Is There Any Difference? "
kindly f*ck off
or "bugger off" as they say in your land of inferiority complexes
You do realize you didn't in any way answer his question, right?
f*ck off poser.
keep thinking you're a moderate and not a left wingnut like you really are.
for bonus points, project your insecurities about your radicalism onto me and pretend like i'm the radical.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
comic boy wrote:Somebody remind me how many Obama threads have been started by the Phat hypocrite
romney threads on the front page: "Romney.. hit new hypocritic high " "Romneyshambles releases short-form tax info " "Mitt Romney Scandals " "Romney and Obama: Is There Any Difference? " "Rmoney and Taxes "
obama threads: "Romney and Obama: Is There Any Difference? "
kindly f*ck off
or "bugger off" as they say in your land of inferiority complexes
You do realize you didn't in any way answer his question, right?
f*ck off poser. keep thinking you're a moderate and not a left wingnut like you really are.
Because I point out that you didn't answer his question, Mr Moderate?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
comic boy wrote:Somebody remind me how many Obama threads have been started by the Phat hypocrite
romney threads on the front page: "Romney.. hit new hypocritic high " "Romneyshambles releases short-form tax info " "Mitt Romney Scandals " "Romney and Obama: Is There Any Difference? " "Rmoney and Taxes "
obama threads: "Romney and Obama: Is There Any Difference? "
kindly f*ck off
or "bugger off" as they say in your land of inferiority complexes
You do realize you didn't in any way answer his question, right?
f*ck off poser. keep thinking you're a moderate and not a left wingnut like you really are.
Because I point out that you didn't answer his question, Mr Moderate?
+5 bonus points to the radical leftist
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Symmetry wrote:Woodruff is a radical leftist? That's kind of a bizarre statement.
I do have a lot of unhappiness with Obama, so I suppose that means I'm not a conservative.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Symmetry wrote:Woodruff is a radical leftist? That's kind of a bizarre statement.
I do have a lot of unhappiness with Obama, so I suppose that means I'm not a conservative.
For what it's worth, I've generally viewed you as a rational conservative poster. The sort of person who holds generally conservative views, but doesn't think that conservatism equates to the Republican party platform.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Symmetry wrote:Woodruff is a radical leftist? That's kind of a bizarre statement.
I do have a lot of unhappiness with Obama, so I suppose that means I'm not a conservative.
For what it's worth, I've generally viewed you as a rational conservative poster. The sort of person who holds generally conservative views, but doesn't think that conservatism equates to the Republican party platform.
i'd imagine that woody could pass as a moderate conservative in the UK. you probably think he's "rational" because he's left-wing by american standards and agrees with you most of the time.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Symmetry wrote:Woodruff is a radical leftist? That's kind of a bizarre statement.
I do have a lot of unhappiness with Obama, so I suppose that means I'm not a conservative.
For what it's worth, I've generally viewed you as a rational conservative poster. The sort of person who holds generally conservative views, but doesn't think that conservatism equates to the Republican party platform.
i'd imagine that woody could pass as a moderate conservative in the UK.
Pretty much anywhere outside of these forums, to be fair. Defaulting from Republican party politics seems to be the definition of liberal here.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Phatscotty wrote:Yes, you guys are bent all out of shape over the dumbest crap, only seeking some kind of self-esteem reassurance building excersize and a convenient scapegoat for all your problems.
I love it when you say these things. It makes your lack of self-reflection so bloody apparent.
I'm sorry that you still don't understand, Woodruff.
And I'm not buying into any of your bullshit either
Control your fear, Woodruff. It's never too late to change your attitudinal beliefs.
Timminz wrote:79. 79 threads that contain the word "Obama" in either the title or the first post.
...all on page 1......
btw, Pimpdave holds the record, with 113 Tea Party/Republican threads in less than 90 days. Did that bother you guys earlier this year?
However, there is actually a point to be made here. What all this shows is that Leftists are not defending any Obama policies, or even talking policy at all. They are taking the path of baselessly accusing everyone and anyone who does not vote for Obama of whatever is convenient at the time.
No, it just proves that more people have made Romney threads that Obama ones in the past few days, likely because Romney has been in the news for not just gaffs, but also things like releasing his tax returns. Obama has just been rather quiet for the past couple of weeks.
And, once again, that your definition of "liberal" is anyone who doesn't share your extreme right views (right on most issues, anyway..)
Symmetry wrote:Woodruff is a radical leftist? That's kind of a bizarre statement.
I do have a lot of unhappiness with Obama, so I suppose that means I'm not a conservative.
For what it's worth, I've generally viewed you as a rational conservative poster. The sort of person who holds generally conservative views, but doesn't think that conservatism equates to the Republican party platform.
I don't tend to think of the Republican Party as the party of conservatives any more. But I also wouldn't consider myself to be a conservative SOCIALLY (some of my personal views are, but in many cases my personal views also include not making them law). As well, conservatives in the United States and conservatives outside of the United States are two vastly different things. The U.S. is really weird in that regard.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Symmetry wrote:Woodruff is a radical leftist? That's kind of a bizarre statement.
I do have a lot of unhappiness with Obama, so I suppose that means I'm not a conservative.
For what it's worth, I've generally viewed you as a rational conservative poster. The sort of person who holds generally conservative views, but doesn't think that conservatism equates to the Republican party platform.
i'd imagine that woody could pass as a moderate conservative in the UK.
Pretty much anywhere outside of these forums, to be fair. Defaulting from Republican party politics seems to be the definition of liberal here.
I don't think it's an "outside of these forums". I think for me to fall within "moderate conservative", I would need to be "outside of the United States". I tend to think that these forums do UNFORTUNATELY reflect the same idiocy that the United States shows as far as what a conservative and a liberal are, which are very different from what those terms mean outside of the United States.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
john9blue wrote:i'm considered one of the most conservative posters here and i'm a centrist.
I don't consider you one of the most conservative posters here. Of the folks who post a lot, I'd go with Night Strike as probably the most conservative (off the top of my head), followed by Phatscotty and Demonfork. And some of the less-than-frequent posters, such as Dibbun and Hapsmo and beezer and DangerBoy would certainly be, in my view, in the general area of Night Strike. I do consider you conservative, but not to their level.
EDIT: I listed Night Strike twice, so this has been corrected. (That's just how conservative he is! <smile>)
Last edited by Woodruff on Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
