Maybe the winner of the poll can get a years supply of condoms, which in your case, would be four.BigBallinStalin wrote:How about having a poll on whether or not your joke was funny?
I dont particularly care whether you find that funny or not.
Moderator: Community Team
Maybe the winner of the poll can get a years supply of condoms, which in your case, would be four.BigBallinStalin wrote:How about having a poll on whether or not your joke was funny?

in my view he's saying that you're not a philosopher, you're a sophist. as far as the redundancy goes: from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/redundantBigBallinStalin wrote:It was okay, but I'll admit that it was better than his Romneyshambles joke. I liked the 'sound and fury' part so much that I had to use it!fadedpsychosis wrote:I admit it... I loledSymmetry wrote: I doubt you've ever been a lover of wisdom, BBS, so the appeal to philosophy seems redundant. If you want a poll, make one. If you want to say that you don't find a pun funny, then I think you've already done that.
The rest is just sound and fury.
I didn't get the redundant part, so maybe you could explain it for me:
. If I'm not a lover of wisdom, then how is appealing to philosophy redundant? Rather, the appeal would be baseless (i.e. based on nothing cuz I'm not a lover of wisdom/philosopher). If I was a lover of wisdom, then appealing to philosophy may seem redundant. I think Sym may have gone wrong in his logic on this one.
John Adams wrote:I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is called a disgrace, that two are called a law firm, and that three or more become a Congress! And by God I have had this Congress!