[CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [30-31 of 61] - Final 12/14

jackal31 · Post by **jackal31** » Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:56 am

vintender wrote:Game 11722682 this was a fisting another win for afos

Vin, I'm glad you guys fisted your way to victory.....but we are only counting this game one time.

watsy wrote:Game 11722682 fisters

vintender · Post by **vintender** » Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:06 pm

well i did enjoy that one

Paddy The Cat · Post by **Paddy The Cat** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:38 pm

jackal31 wrote:
vintender wrote:Game 11722682 this was a fisting another win for afos
Vin, I'm glad you guys fisted your way to victory.....but we are only counting this game one time.

watsy wrote:Game 11722682 fisters

skillfull · Post by **skillfull** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:32 pm

Go go go monkis!
Ooooops, that was for the private forum!

vintender · Post by **vintender** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 10:22 pm

Game 11725593 Big Fist on this one

vintender · Post by **vintender** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:50 pm

Game 11804739 cant beat the Brazilians on their home turf, another fist

vintender · Post by **vintender** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:53 pm

Game 11804633 another fisting here

vintender · Post by **vintender** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:59 pm

Game 11802092 another AFOS

vintender · Post by **vintender** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:03 pm

Game 11802115 more fisting going on here

jackin_u_up · Post by **jackin_u_up** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:18 am

The gap narrows a bit and the third round is about to start.
Since the monkis are ahead .
i think its only fair that we should get to go first in all of our round 3 games

laughingcavalier · Post by **laughingcavalier** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 9:39 pm

jackin_u_up wrote:The gap narrows a bit and the third round is about to start.
Since the monkis are ahead .
i think its only fair that we should get to go first in all of our round 3 games

Sure you can go first if we get to throw all the sixes

Looks like it will be very tight indeed going into the final set.

vintender · Post by **vintender** » Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:46 am

Game 11804696 we own these settings

virtually unbeatable here

codeblue1018 · Post by **codeblue1018** » Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:16 am

vintender wrote:Game 11804696 we own these settings virtually unbeatable here

Glad I didn't bet my house because I would have bet you would have lost this game without question. The round that I was eliminated by red, just curious, did he throw anything other than sixes?

skillfull · Post by **skillfull** » Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:18 pm

two wins for monkis , Game 11804675 and Game 11804653 , gg guys

laughingcavalier · Post by **laughingcavalier** » Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:57 pm

Game 11722684 TSM win

vintender · Post by **vintender** » Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:08 pm

codeblue1018 wrote:
vintender wrote:Game 11804696 we own these settings virtually unbeatable here
Glad I didn't bet my house because I would have bet you would have lost this game without question. The round that I was eliminated by red, just curious, did he throw anything other than sixes?

idk, maybe that's why we have a such a high win rate against excellent opponents

laughingcavalier · Post by **laughingcavalier** » Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:52 pm

vintender wrote:
codeblue1018 wrote:
vintender wrote:Game 11804696 we own these settings virtually unbeatable here
Glad I didn't bet my house because I would have bet you would have lost this game without question. The round that I was eliminated by red, just curious, did he throw anything other than sixes?
idk, maybe that's why we have a such a high win rate against excellent opponents

Aha so you are admitting to dice-fixing!
C&A thread on its way.

skillfull · Post by **skillfull** » Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:10 pm

Game 11802123 monki win

jackin_u_up · Post by **jackin_u_up** » Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:13 pm

laughingcavalier wrote:
vintender wrote:
codeblue1018 wrote:
vintender wrote:Game 11804696 we own these settings virtually unbeatable here
Glad I didn't bet my house because I would have bet you would have lost this game without question. The round that I was eliminated by red, just curious, did he throw anything other than sixes?
idk, maybe that's why we have a such a high win rate against excellent opponents
Aha so you are admitting to dice-fixing!
C&A thread on its way.

Every clan knows that the Monkis were the first clan to develop a greasemonkey dice scripter.
The problem with ours is we cannot find a way to allow our flux capacitor to maintain 134 kilajewels/sec . Ifwe could keep ours working for longer than a few rolls.

Paddy The Cat · Post by **Paddy The Cat** » Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:39 pm

jackin_u_up wrote:
laughingcavalier wrote:
vintender wrote:
codeblue1018 wrote:
vintender wrote:Game 11804696 we own these settings virtually unbeatable here
Glad I didn't bet my house because I would have bet you would have lost this game without question. The round that I was eliminated by red, just curious, did he throw anything other than sixes?
idk, maybe that's why we have a such a high win rate against excellent opponents
Aha so you are admitting to dice-fixing!
C&A thread on its way.
Every clan knows that the Monkis were the first clan to develop a greasemonkey dice scripter.
The problem with ours is we cannot find a way to allow our flux capacitor to maintain 134 kilajewels/sec . Ifwe could keep ours working for longer than a few rolls.

he meant kilajewels/second btw. we've built a flux capacitor to supply power to some local communities in hopes to buy out the monkis. we measure our profit in jewels for some reason...

laughingcavalier · Post by **laughingcavalier** » Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:05 pm

Paddy The Cat wrote:
jackin_u_up wrote:
laughingcavalier wrote:
vintender wrote:
codeblue1018 wrote:
vintender wrote:Game 11804696 we own these settings virtually unbeatable here
Glad I didn't bet my house because I would have bet you would have lost this game without question. The round that I was eliminated by red, just curious, did he throw anything other than sixes?
idk, maybe that's why we have a such a high win rate against excellent opponents
Aha so you are admitting to dice-fixing!
C&A thread on its way.
Every clan knows that the Monkis were the first clan to develop a greasemonkey dice scripter.
The problem with ours is we cannot find a way to allow our flux capacitor to maintain 134 kilajewels/sec . Ifwe could keep ours working for longer than a few rolls.
he meant kilajewels/second btw. we've built a flux capacitor to supply power to some local communities in hopes to buy out the monkis. we measure our profit in jewels for some reason...

Ah jewels that’s where you’d be going wrong you see. Shooting for the stars, always a mistake. All that treasure, smiles and joy. Yuck.
We use kiloshits. Bad luck is much more reliable than good luck. Get the bad luck sorted – note our results against KORT & in clan league – then you back-dial the program to negative negative values. We were running about -2.6 kiloshits in the last challenge. Sounds a lot but it is still only 0.0026 megapoops. lackattack wouldn’t even get out of bed for that much.

Anyway you are going to need to get your fluxfields all shook out and spinning. The monki in charge of counting has run out of fingers so we can’t be 100% sure of this but it looks like:

First set monkis take 12-9
Second set to fist 11-9 (or maybe 10-10 with a bit of luck for us).
So we are going into the final round at 21-20 or maybe 22-19.

watsy · Post by **watsy** » Fri Nov 09, 2012 5:32 pm

[Game]11722686 [/Game] heading our way this was just about the best game of waterloo i have ever played in could have gone either way top respect to all who played in it

Paddy The Cat · Post by **Paddy The Cat** » Sat Nov 10, 2012 2:53 pm

Laughingcavalier. That may have been the most I have ever laughed in my life at a CC post. If I was in charge of AFOS I'd concede to you right now.

jackin_u_up · Post by **jackin_u_up** » Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:32 pm

jackin_u_up

laughingcavalier wrote:
laughingcavalier wrote:
vintender wrote:
codeblue1018 wrote:
vintender wrote:Game 11804696 we own these settings virtually unbeatable here
Glad I didn't bet my house because I would have bet you would have lost this game without question. The round that I was eliminated by red, just curious, did he throw anything other than sixes?
idk, maybe that's why we have a such a high win rate against excellent opponents
Aha so you are admitting to dice-fixing!
C&A thread on its way.
Every clan knows that the Monkis were the first clan to develop a greasemonkey dice scripter.
The problem with ours is we cannot find a way to allow our flux capacitor to maintain 134 kilajewels/sec . Ifwe could keep ours working for longer than a few rolls.

he meant kilajewels/second btw. we've built a flux capacitor to supply power to some local communities in hopes to buy out the monkis. we measure our profit in jewels for some reason...[/quote]

Ah jewels that’s where you’d be going wrong you see. Shooting for the stars, always a mistake. All that treasure, smiles and joy. Yuck.
We use kiloshits. Bad luck is much more reliable than good luck. Get the bad luck sorted – note our results against KORT & in clan league – then you back-dial the program to negative negative values. We were running about -2.6 kiloshits in the last challenge. Sounds a lot but it is still only 0.0026 megapoops. lackattack wouldn’t even get out of bed for that much.

Anyway you are going to need to get your fluxfields all shook out and spinning. The monki in charge of counting has run out of fingers so we can’t be 100% sure of this but it looks like:

First set monkis take 12-9
Second set to fist 11-9 (or maybe 10-10 with a bit of luck for us).
So we are going into the final round at 21-20 or maybe 22-19.[/quote]

Kiloshits u don't say .... but of course it makes perfect sense ....by back dialing and aligning the fluxfields to allow a double negative reverberation you end up with a Continous Reverberation Aligning Positon. or C.R.A. P. ,,,as anyone who knows anything about the probability and luck quotients. All u need to do is then combine the two Negative C.R.A.P. fields and then BAMMMM Sweet Success.

Ok gonna go try and get this up and running for round 3.
Go figure some Dirty Monkis figured it out First.

laughingcavalier · Post by **laughingcavalier** » Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:32 pm

Ah now you are talking.
Talking CRAP that is.

[CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [30-31 of 61] - Final 12/14

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [10-5 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [10-5 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [10-5 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [10-5 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [11-5 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [17-14 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [13-8 of 61]

Re: [CC3] TSM vs. AFoS [18-15 of 61]