[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
How is it obvious open/shut case? They could just be friends or related. They both win games. If one was winning every game then I might agree with the multi charge. No chat and quick turns support my friends or relatives theory. Plus they joined at the same time. Just seems weird if they were multis that they would play themselves and not have one win all the games. What would be the point?