[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
king achilles wrote:2013-03-12 17:16:57 - maxfaraday: that's because it's operated by ly mexicans
2013-03-12 17:17:10 - maxfaraday: *by
2013-03-12 17:17:24 - maxfaraday: *lazy
This is not bigotry. It is nothing compared to your past report.
I never said this is bigotry, in fact, neither was mine. I called the Greeks lazy and got noted. Now that is a precedent. He calls Mexicans lazy and gets cleared?
king achilles wrote:2013-03-12 17:16:57 - maxfaraday: that's because it's operated by ly mexicans
2013-03-12 17:17:10 - maxfaraday: *by
2013-03-12 17:17:24 - maxfaraday: *lazy
This is not bigotry. It is nothing compared to your past report.
I never said this is bigotry, in fact, neither was mine. I called the Greeks lazy and got noted. Now that is a precedent. He calls Mexicans lazy and gets cleared?
So I'm curious... why is calling someone a Jew or the N-word bigotry but calling someone a Dog eater or Lazy Mexican isn't? I see them all as bigotry.
I smell a double standard.
I don't care if it's all allowed or none of it's allowed, just don't be all wishy-washy and inconsistent.
I could be just as vulgar if it weren't against the rules, you never know...
My point is that others are warned for less so wtf.
I don't nescessarily think there should be a "bigotry rule" if it doesn't apply to everyone and all forms. Otherwise it just looks like favoritism.
