Moderator: Clan Directors
I thought all the EMP and AOC games were not counting as we would have some half-finished sets?qwert wrote:CL5
Myth-Emp 5-3
Emp-Myth 4-4
total-Myth-Emp 9-7 [finished 2013-04-15 22:40:34]


Any fully finished individual set will count.jj3044 wrote:I thought all the EMP and AOC games were not counting as we would have some half-finished sets?qwert wrote:CL5
Myth-Emp 5-3
Emp-Myth 4-4
total-Myth-Emp 9-7 [finished 2013-04-15 22:40:34]

I feel like they should be given 0-8 for any unfinished sets.IcePack wrote:Any fully finished individual set will count.jj3044 wrote:I thought all the EMP and AOC games were not counting as we would have some half-finished sets?qwert wrote:CL5
Myth-Emp 5-3
Emp-Myth 4-4
total-Myth-Emp 9-7 [finished 2013-04-15 22:40:34]

Hey lokisgal,lokisgal wrote:you missed IA vs Pigg
FORECAST PURPOSES ONLY: Based on "guesstimated end date" of 5/1/13 and assumes no other wars between 4/15 and 5/1 (because obviously I can't predict them all between now and then and I have to give a completion date). Actual results may vary.Leehar wrote:Hi Ice, I know the wars aren't finished yet, so results probably won't be included yet, but can we see the effect of tofu-kort & afos-aoc on the rankings?
I will quote chapcrap here:Genoke wrote: There is 1 thing i don't understand. If i'm right AQoH has finished 4 clan wars so far and won all of them. But they have less then 1000 points now. I thought a counting started at 1000....
Could you explain this please? I don't wanna be surprised when we meet the rankings.
This is a very generic but to the point way of it. If you play vs lower ranked clans than wherever your clan is ranked, if the point difference is enough you will have to win by a larger margin than just a simple win. 3 out of 4 wars they fought were off the bottom of the clan rankings list. It means they needed to win by larger margins for the most part. Typically, a clans rank is a little off when they first get included into F400, as time goes on it gets more accurate. I believe I had a conversation w/ kuma regarding some of these items as well. If you have more specific questions and want to chat or get more specifics, you can always reach me in LC or on skype. Just drop me a PM ill' be happy to address any concerns you have for wars or potential wars. I've offered advice / help from a F400 perspective for those who were interested previously.chapcrap wrote: It's because F400 gives you points based on the expected outcome that you should get. So, if you beat a low ranked clan by just a little, you can lose points. But, if you lose to a higher ranked clan by just a little, you can gain points. Basically, it matters how much you win by.
Treslie wrote:I could be wrong, but isn't it low because we only get a percentage of the points based on the formula to compensate for the fact that we don't have a 2 year history? Doesn't this make it more fair to clans that have been established longer?
CoF is right.Chariot of Fire wrote:I think you're wrong Tres, but Ice will clarify I'm sure. A result is a result - the age of a clan is immaterial and the only thing that a long history impacts on the F400 is decay (losing points won a long time ago).
Yes it appears so. I know it was mentioned once before, but I have been busy. But I'll probably end up saving myself time in the long run. So yeah, I'll do it.chapcrap wrote:Ice needs a FAQ...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 8&t=188490ManBungalow wrote:I just checked by this thread to see where Empire rank, and I couldn't find it on the most recent list.
Am I blind, or has something happened to it?
Generally speaking unplayed games or sets are not counted in any of the scores. I'm not sure about penalties, forfeits, etc. I'd have to look into it. But for unplayed games or mistakes, like AOC/AFOS 59 in lieu of 61, those 2 missing games are not assigned to anybody. Points aren't awarded for games not played.chapcrap wrote:I feel like they should be given 0-8 for any unfinished sets.


There are you who are trying to haste games by attacking teammates (Hive game). So you are the one who are trying those games to be updated with unnatural and artificial time so your rankings can be updated earlier than it should be if the game outcome is normal.Chariot of Fire wrote:Woo, KORT relegated to 3rd. No wonder they are taking 23 hours to play each turn in the two remaining games. They don't want the result to be posted prior to CC4 seedings being announced.

Yes, because yellow (10 regions) deploying on himself and attacking team mate cyan (87 regions) makes perfect sense. You complete oaf. Are you really that clueless?What you do in those games: You are attacking teammates in order to artificially haste games to be updated in earlier time than it should be if both teams play their 100% performance (Hive, yellow turn, Round 22).

Yeah 4v1,1,1 by killing 1 teammate on the way is great attempt to break a bonus. not to say that jut turn before cyan had chance to break that bonus directly instead of you going 4v1,1,1. cyan is on border of blue bonus, who has defensive 1 on the bonus.Chariot of Fire wrote:Yes, because yellow (10 regions) deploying on himself and attacking team mate cyan (87 regions) makes perfect sense. You complete oaf. Are you really that clueless?What you do in those games: You are attacking teammates in order to artificially haste games to be updated in earlier time than it should be if both teams play their 100% performance (Hive, yellow turn, Round 22).![]()
Game 12349146
If you can't see an attempt at a bonus break I feel sorry for you (well no, I don't really, I hope you get hit by a bus)


only finished sets will count, because minimum required for f400 to count are 12 games. Only two matches will be count-LOW vs AOC and Myth vs EMp, because only these two will have finished bouth sets.jj3044 wrote:I thought all the EMP and AOC games were not counting as we would have some half-finished sets?qwert wrote:CL5
Myth-Emp 5-3
Emp-Myth 4-4
total-Myth-Emp 9-7 [finished 2013-04-15 22:40:34]
F**k off Josko. Spread your lies elsewhere, you have no idea. If a game is lost it is lost (you said so yourself when you declared it 'won' weeks ago). And now you are accusing us of deliberate team mate killing because I went thru a team mate's 1 to break a bonus. Just accept you were wrong, wrong, wrong - as you so often are.josko.ri wrote:Yeah 4v1,1,1 by killing 1 teammate on the way is great attempt to break a bonus. not to say that jut turn before cyan had chance to break that bonus directly instead of you going 4v1,1,1. cyan is on border of blue bonus, who has defensive 1 on the bonus.Chariot of Fire wrote:Yes, because yellow (10 regions) deploying on himself and attacking team mate cyan (87 regions) makes perfect sense. You complete oaf. Are you really that clueless?What you do in those games: You are attacking teammates in order to artificially haste games to be updated in earlier time than it should be if both teams play their 100% performance (Hive, yellow turn, Round 22).![]()
Game 12349146
If you can't see an attempt at a bonus break I feel sorry for you (well no, I don't really, I hope you get hit by a bus)
It is only attempt to haste the game on artificial way by killing teammates instead of we do it.
Game 12287084
So in Hive you went 4v1,1,1 and "present" it like trying to break bonus, and in C Rome blue had chance 6v1,1 to break bonus but hey, he rather sit with his 6! Why should he go break bonus, when your goal is artificially haste the game? It is much better leave us with much higher drop so the game can be over sooner than play your the best moves, isn't it? I wonder if now you sitting for yellow will not go break our praetor, so we can get extra drop by holding it?
We are playing our the best moves every turn. You are intentionally making bad moves in order to haste games. And at the end you point fingers into us for doing something unfair. Hillarious, what else to say![]()

I agree that lost game is lost game. However, it can be lost today and it can also be lost 1 month from now. What you are doing is trying to haste games (by attacking teammates and not breaking our bonuses when you have chance) in order to get higher seeded position ahead of time than which you would actually get it if you play games normally and if you do your best moves. You know, when people stay without arguments, they start to use agression, which is so obvious in your post my dearChariot of Fire wrote:F**k off Josko. Spread your lies elsewhere, you have no idea. If a game is lost it is lost (you said so yourself when you declared it 'won' weeks ago). And now you are accusing us of deliberate team mate killing because I went thru a team mate's 1 to break a bonus. Just accept you were wrong, wrong, wrong - as you so often are.josko.ri wrote:Yeah 4v1,1,1 by killing 1 teammate on the way is great attempt to break a bonus. not to say that jut turn before cyan had chance to break that bonus directly instead of you going 4v1,1,1. cyan is on border of blue bonus, who has defensive 1 on the bonus.Chariot of Fire wrote:Yes, because yellow (10 regions) deploying on himself and attacking team mate cyan (87 regions) makes perfect sense. You complete oaf. Are you really that clueless?What you do in those games: You are attacking teammates in order to artificially haste games to be updated in earlier time than it should be if both teams play their 100% performance (Hive, yellow turn, Round 22).![]()
Game 12349146
If you can't see an attempt at a bonus break I feel sorry for you (well no, I don't really, I hope you get hit by a bus)
It is only attempt to haste the game on artificial way by killing teammates instead of we do it.
Game 12287084
So in Hive you went 4v1,1,1 and "present" it like trying to break bonus, and in C Rome blue had chance 6v1,1 to break bonus but hey, he rather sit with his 6! Why should he go break bonus, when your goal is artificially haste the game? It is much better leave us with much higher drop so the game can be over sooner than play your the best moves, isn't it? I wonder if now you sitting for yellow will not go break our praetor, so we can get extra drop by holding it?
We are playing our the best moves every turn. You are intentionally making bad moves in order to haste games. And at the end you point fingers into us for doing something unfair. Hillarious, what else to say![]()



The odd skirmish doesn't bother me now and then doesn't bother me.silversun6 wrote:can people be banned from writing in forums for a while?
POW! Right in the kisser.Keefie wrote:Enjoy it while it lastsGilligan wrote:Top 15, yeah!
You guys are friends on Facebook? I have to admit, I wouldn't have guessed that.josko.ri wrote: Also, when you lose control of yourself, do you always send threatening private message on Facebook inbox like you did to me right after writing the last comment in this thread? It seems like someone really lost control if for issues which is happening on gaming site he is sending threatening inboxes on private basis.

i wont be surprised if Josko and COF are multies and all the thrash talk is just for not arouse suspicionshyposquasher wrote:You guys are friends on Facebook? I have to admit, I wouldn't have guessed that.josko.ri wrote: Also, when you lose control of yourself, do you always send threatening private message on Facebook inbox like you did to me right after writing the last comment in this thread? It seems like someone really lost control if for issues which is happening on gaming site he is sending threatening inboxes on private basis.




