Phatscotty wrote:YES! America should make it's law's based around what al-qada "says"!
Certainly, we should ignore anything they say that might be relevant, because FREEDOM!!!!
Look, I'm sure that particular Al Qaida spokesman didn't make those statements to help us see our problems. I'm sure it was meant to in some way help them. I get that. It doesn't mean there aren't points there that are relevant and should be considered objectively.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Rumored: A suspect has been apprehended in the Boston Bombing. Hope it's true, conclusive and the search is over. Now on to spending millions to prosecute the miserable fuck.
_sabotage_ wrote:Which Al Qaeda? the one we still support, the one we say Bin Laden was a/the leader of, the one we used to support in Afghan, the one that we put together for the RICO conviction pre-9/11, the one that helps attack errant nations like Libya and Syria, or the regular ol Islamic fundamentalist terrorists?
Can we have an official breakdown of if al Qaeda then which subunit? it's left wingers, an al Qaeda rogue gunman, their stated leader, which exact section perpetrated it and what are their clear motives?
Get to the bottom of it and leave no trails unchecked and the outcome would provide a clear sense of justice, and then we would have a trial that dwarfed OJs and allowed for informed debate.
It is a tragedy, but at which scale and to what response? Dimes says, because we can envision it reoccurring, BBS thinks we have no market for it.
The TSA will tighten, screening of information will increase, "procedure" will be permanently bypassed and at the end of the day, our knowledge of what happened in Boston will be murky at best. Fear the unknown, fear is what will create the market.
The market for terrorism is practically nil--compared to other forms of violent, coercive (non-governmental) business.
By 'terrorism', I'm referring to the primary targeting of innocent civilians. Primarily targeting government facilities and coercive personnel (police, military) counts as 'insurgency'.
thegreekdog wrote:3. I had not heard that international terrorists were very concerned about gun control in the United States. Good to know.
UNBELIEVABLE VIDEO! Most-Wanted Al Qaeda Terrorist, Adam Gadahn, Likes NRA Gun Show Loophole
Oh, they talk about it.
Good to know.
Woodruff - Why didn't you post this video? Oh right, because you were trolling Phatscotty and Night Strike.
Or because...you know...I've never seen that video. It's also not relevant to the point I was making.
I mean, seriously greek? You seem to have really gone off the deep end.
Well now I'm just fucking with you. I'm an angrier greekdog these days.
Careful...I used to be calm and unemotional online, and then I gave in to the dark angrier online persona a year and a half or so ago, and there's no turning back once that happens (because by God I don't WANT to turn back! <smile>).
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
oVo wrote:Rumored: A suspect has been apprehended in the Boston Bombing. Hope it's true, conclusive and the search is over. Now on to spending millions to prosecute the miserable fuck.
Woodruff wrote:Careful...I used to be calm and unemotional online, and then I gave in to the dark angrier online persona a year and a half or so ago, and there's no turning back once that happens (because by God I don't WANT to turn back! <smile>).
I'm wondering at what level my anger will get me banned. I guess we'll see. It only increases by reading certain posters, one of whom hasn't posted in a couple of days.
2dimes wrote:Quiet down you monkeys. I'm trying to read this.
oVo wrote:Rumored: A suspect has been apprehended in the Boston Bombing. Hope it's true, conclusive and the search is over. Now on to spending millions to prosecute the miserable fuck.
Woodruff wrote:Careful...I used to be calm and unemotional online, and then I gave in to the dark angrier online persona a year and a half or so ago, and there's no turning back once that happens (because by God I don't WANT to turn back! <smile>).
I'm wondering at what level my anger will get me banned. I guess we'll see. It only increases by reading certain posters, one of whom hasn't posted in a couple of days.
Oh yes, mine is also typically very user-specific (although I suppose you might have to consider the "moderators as a group" as one of those users too...).
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
2dimes wrote:Quiet down you monkeys. I'm trying to read this.
oVo wrote:Rumored: A suspect has been apprehended in the Boston Bombing. Hope it's true, conclusive and the search is over. Now on to spending millions to prosecute the miserable fuck.
Let's hope so.
Reuters said that CNN jumped the gun.
True, several networks announced this without confirmation. I don't care who "gets the scoop" so just shut the hell up until you actually have some facts worth reporting.
No more second guessing, "expert" speculation, jumping to conclusions or any of the other bullshit stinking up the news.
_sabotage_ wrote:Which Al Qaeda? the one we still support, the one we say Bin Laden was a/the leader of, the one we used to support in Afghan, the one that we put together for the RICO conviction pre-9/11, the one that helps attack errant nations like Libya and Syria, or the regular ol Islamic fundamentalist terrorists?
Can we have an official breakdown of if al Qaeda then which subunit? it's left wingers, an al Qaeda rogue gunman, their stated leader, which exact section perpetrated it and what are their clear motives?
Get to the bottom of it and leave no trails unchecked and the outcome would provide a clear sense of justice, and then we would have a trial that dwarfed OJs and allowed for informed debate.
It is a tragedy, but at which scale and to what response? Dimes says, because we can envision it reoccurring, BBS thinks we have no market for it.
The TSA will tighten, screening of information will increase, "procedure" will be permanently bypassed and at the end of the day, our knowledge of what happened in Boston will be murky at best. Fear the unknown, fear is what will create the market.
The market for terrorism is practically nil--compared to other forms of violent, coercive (non-governmental) business.
By 'terrorism', I'm referring to the primary targeting of innocent civilians. Primarily targeting government facilities and coercive personnel (police, military) counts as 'insurgency'.
Just being clear.
to me 'terrorist' means there's a show of 'justice' before we shoot, 'insurgent' means pull the damn trigger 'cause they're sure as shit shooting at us...
John Adams wrote:I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is called a disgrace, that two are called a law firm, and that three or more become a Congress! And by God I have had this Congress!
2dimes wrote:Quiet down you monkeys. I'm trying to read this.
oVo wrote:Rumored: A suspect has been apprehended in the Boston Bombing. Hope it's true, conclusive and the search is over. Now on to spending millions to prosecute the miserable fuck.
Let's hope so.
Reuters said that CNN jumped the gun.
True, several networks announced this without confirmation. I don't care who "gets the scoop" so just shut the hell up until you actually have some facts worth reporting.
No more second guessing, "expert" speculation, jumping to conclusions or any of the other bullshit stinking up the news.
CNN, completely wrong, gets scolded by the FBI for their report.
is someone has not yet posted this already. The bomb was a simple bomb using a slow cooker to detonate the bomb. The cooker was filled with nails and other dangerous shrapne.
2dimes wrote:Quiet down you monkeys. I'm trying to read this.
oVo wrote:Rumored: A suspect has been apprehended in the Boston Bombing. Hope it's true, conclusive and the search is over. Now on to spending millions to prosecute the miserable fuck.
Let's hope so.
They have identified 2 suspects, but have not arrested anyone.
Several pictures of people "oh so thorough" folks have posted on the internet have, however been determined to NOT be of the bomber. That might be why the FBI is saying to stick to the photos they have sent out for people to use, copy, etc.
_sabotage_ wrote:Which Al Qaeda? the one we still support, the one we say Bin Laden was a/the leader of, the one we used to support in Afghan, the one that we put together for the RICO conviction pre-9/11, the one that helps attack errant nations like Libya and Syria, or the regular ol Islamic fundamentalist terrorists?
Can we have an official breakdown of if al Qaeda then which subunit? it's left wingers, an al Qaeda rogue gunman, their stated leader, which exact section perpetrated it and what are their clear motives?
Get to the bottom of it and leave no trails unchecked and the outcome would provide a clear sense of justice, and then we would have a trial that dwarfed OJs and allowed for informed debate.
It is a tragedy, but at which scale and to what response? Dimes says, because we can envision it reoccurring, BBS thinks we have no market for it.
The TSA will tighten, screening of information will increase, "procedure" will be permanently bypassed and at the end of the day, our knowledge of what happened in Boston will be murky at best. Fear the unknown, fear is what will create the market.
The market for terrorism is practically nil--compared to other forms of violent, coercive (non-governmental) business.
By 'terrorism', I'm referring to the primary targeting of innocent civilians. Primarily targeting government facilities and coercive personnel (police, military) counts as 'insurgency'.
Just being clear.
to me 'terrorist' means there's a show of 'justice' before we shoot, 'insurgent' means pull the damn trigger 'cause they're sure as shit shooting at us...
Crazy night...I fell asleep with the TV on and woke up to real life 24 episode.
Shoot out at MIT One Cop shot and killed Another shootout after carjacking Another cop shot and killed Explosion from another explosive device(possibly thrown out the window of car) One terrorist killed Second terrorist at large MBTA shut down Watertown closed Surrounding towns...kind of closed is my description And I havent watched in 15 min, so that may all have changed
All paraphrased from CNN
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk Too much. I know.
But I dont like people to tell me what I should do also.
Unless it your beloved Mother Russia?
Once again... CIA slut is preaching others about Russia. What an idiot
Don't worry, the CIA is monitoring Macedonia and preparing a Rainbow Revolution to install a gay President there before long. And then you and Oneeyed can come out and be accepted by all.
Have you ever wondered why there are organizations like Al Qaeda, ISIS or any look a like? Have you ever wonder why Boston bomber did what he did? Have you ever wondered why 9/11 happen? Because of what you said, because of your desires for others. Have you ever wonder when will it stop? When you bleed out like slaughtered fat pig or you give up on your desires.
Just to make clear why it happen... Knowing that will lead to prevention, not knowing it will lead to repetition of similar event, until the reason for happening is understood. Simple.