Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Vs Masterson. And the Indians have won 8 in a row, probably will arrive with 12 in a row.Serbia wrote:I'll be going to see the Tigers play in Cleveland on Tuesday. Verlander is scheduled to start.
Bollocks.
lolnietzsche wrote:Vs Masterson. And the Indians have won 8 in a row, probably will arrive with 12 in a row.Serbia wrote:I'll be going to see the Tigers play in Cleveland on Tuesday. Verlander is scheduled to start.
Bollocks.
You will watch a masacre.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Jonny Gomes AB was a very good one.Army of GOD wrote:What a comeback by the Sox.
I didn't see the ? at first... was shocked. Nah, I don't think so he's that stupid, if MLB is offering him a deal he'll take it.oVo wrote:A Rod banned for life for using growth hormone?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
My wife is a Dodgers fan from WAY back. She's not a highly-annoying one, though...but it's mostly because my Cardinals tend to have at least as much success as the Dodgers do.nietzsche wrote:Anyone getting sick of the Dodgers? I have a friend who is hardcore Dodgers fan, and he's getting very annoying. Salary caps on MLB please.
How "WAY back" was it? We had people in my family who were Dodgers fans. They gave up once the team moved away from Brooklyn.Woodruff wrote:My wife is a Dodgers fan from WAY back.

Back in the 70s. She and her grandmother used to sit and watch Dodgers games on the television, because that was the only team whose games were broadcast where they could watch them. She was probably under ten at the time, so it's a very important connection to her. Dusty Baker is her favorite Dodger of all time.tzor wrote:How "WAY back" was it? We had people in my family who were Dodgers fans. They gave up once the team moved away from Brooklyn.Woodruff wrote:My wife is a Dodgers fan from WAY back.
I agree. They need to at least get a minimum and maximum or some kind of system where a team can only pay a certain number of players over $15 million (arbitrary number). Some kind of system besides this soft cap BS.nietzsche wrote:Salary caps on MLB please.
Foed.nietzsche wrote:GO CUBS!!!!!!
One should always support the Cubs because ...nietzsche wrote:GO CUBS!!!!!!

Army of GOD wrote:A-Rod is a giant dickweed but I hope he doesn't get suspended for long so the Yankees still have to pay out of their ass for him.
Seriously, f*ck the Yankees.
Could it be that the Yankees played a part on reigniting the steroids investigations to have A-Rod banned and don't have to pay him?chapcrap wrote:Army of GOD wrote:A-Rod is a giant dickweed but I hope he doesn't get suspended for long so the Yankees still have to pay out of their ass for him.
Seriously, f*ck the Yankees.
I believe that has already occurred, given their current record. I suspect that a century from now they will be looking back at this with the same attitude that Cubs fans look upon that incident with the goat.Army of GOD wrote:A-Rod is a giant dickweed but I hope he doesn't get suspended for long so the Yankees still have to pay out of their ass for him.
Seriously, f*ck the Yankees.

Well, Ryan Braun is without his salary through his suspension...that's a pretty big monetary hit, if you as me.Night Strike wrote:All that money should be forced to be paid out to a charity or something. And there really needs to be some monetary punishment to players who get to sign these big contracts while on PEDs yet get to keep playing out the contract. They should be forced to play a year for the minimum salary before signing a new contract. Or something along those lines.
He loses less than $4 million off an approximately $11 million contract. Next year, his 5 year, $105 million (approximate numbers) contract kicks in that he signed immediately after the 2011 season, when he tested positive for PEDs but weaseled out of the ban. That means he has to lose $4 million in order to gain $21 million per year for 5 years. Sounds like an easy trade off.Woodruff wrote:Well, Ryan Braun is without his salary through his suspension...that's a pretty big monetary hit, if you as me.Night Strike wrote:All that money should be forced to be paid out to a charity or something. And there really needs to be some monetary punishment to players who get to sign these big contracts while on PEDs yet get to keep playing out the contract. They should be forced to play a year for the minimum salary before signing a new contract. Or something along those lines.
That's just it...it's not a trade off. It's a full loss of $4 million. At the time Braun took the PEDs, he wasn't thinking "It doesn't matter if I get caught, because even though I'll lose $4 million, I'll gain $105 million". He was thinking "I won't get caught". Period.Night Strike wrote:He loses less than $4 million off an approximately $11 million contract. Next year, his 5 year, $105 million (approximate numbers) contract kicks in that he signed immediately after the 2011 season, when he tested positive for PEDs but weaseled out of the ban. That means he has to lose $4 million in order to gain $21 million per year for 5 years. Sounds like an easy trade off.Woodruff wrote:Well, Ryan Braun is without his salary through his suspension...that's a pretty big monetary hit, if you as me.Night Strike wrote:All that money should be forced to be paid out to a charity or something. And there really needs to be some monetary punishment to players who get to sign these big contracts while on PEDs yet get to keep playing out the contract. They should be forced to play a year for the minimum salary before signing a new contract. Or something along those lines.