What happened that we need to explain why we remove a joke vote? Its the second time I have seen it in a few day. Its hopefully moving out of joke stage so I unvoted. I don't feel I should have to explain this though.
my post first was meant as a derision on the joke vote phase manly because I was on my phone and bold colored text is a pain to do on it for a vote that isn't . As for my second you can take it as an argument for "vote no vote" a case for me witch would have been foolish for me to do apparently I don't think things through that early it the day. If making I tacit argument for no vote is reason to hang me then the safari case
safariguy5 wrote:Again with the whole "wait until a case is presented by someone else".
else-wise I waiting to see who spiesr request revels as lest sure why there voting for me
Hensow wrote:my post first was meant as a derision on the joke vote phase manly because I was on my phone and bold colored text is a pain to do on it for a vote that isn't . As for my second you can take it as an argument for "vote no vote" a case for me witch would have been foolish for me to do apparently I don't think things through that early it the day. If making I tacit argument for no vote is reason to hang me then the safari case
safariguy5 wrote:Again with the whole "wait until a case is presented by someone else".
else-wise I waiting to see who spiesr request revels as lest sure why there voting for me
Safariguy is saying that as in someone used the excuse "wait until a case is presented by someone else" and that they have done it several times. Thats means that doesnt even help your case. IDK if the language barrier is the problem here, or if you are squirming, but I saw nothing that hinted at "vote no vote" in your typing, so I am going to Vote Hensow because by my count (since I finally went back and got the VC for you people who dont like me waiting for a VC ) I am now putting you to L-2.
spiesr wrote:Could those voting for Hensow explain to me again what exactly they are basing this off of?
I believe Hensow quoted my original reason, but not the post I was referring to, but basically he just wants to not post until someone brings up a case and then I believe he would just bandwagon a vote onto said case. Although the second part is partly speculation, deliberately not participating would be classic scum move to not say anything that would draw town cop investigation or accidentally let something slip.
Hensow (5) - safariguy5; new guy1; thechuck51; gregwolf121; ghostly447 gregwolf121 (2) - spiesr; kgb007; Iron Butterfly (1) - skillfusniper; safariguy5 (1) - TheForgivenOne; skillfusniper (1) - Iron Butterfly;
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Deadline is Monday 26 August @ 0900 GMT. If the votes were to remain at the time of posting, at deadline, a 24 hour run off would be enforced.
A prod has been sent to gregwolf121.
War doesn't determine who's right; it determines who's left.
Lack of activity as a VT? That is quite a show. Useless and even more useless. I think its just a bad fake claim. Even if its not, if your a VT you havent exactly tried to play your part, and the level of activity shown isnt going to help catch scum.
Questions like that seem awfully close to violating (at least the intent of) rule 2. [spoiler]2. Do not quote any PMs you receive from the Mod. The only things you may post (loosely paraphrasing) are your roles (and anything associated with them), and alignment, during the active game. Once the game has concluded, feel free to post the rest of your personal information. You may not post your win condition, how many words are in your role PM, or any other kind of way to get around not quoting PMs.[/spoiler]
I always hate having a VT claim, since most of the time they are a lie of some kind. He may also be 3rd party instead of Mafia which makes this difficult. I could really see someone having the roll of Spring or Fall.
spiesr wrote:
kgb007 wrote:
Hensow wrote:summer
what color was your role PM?
Questions like that seem awfully close to violating (at least the intent of) rule 2. [spoiler]2. Do not quote any PMs you receive from the Mod. The only things you may post (loosely paraphrasing) are your roles (and anything associated with them), and alignment, during the active game. Once the game has concluded, feel free to post the rest of your personal information. You may not post your win condition, how many words are in your role PM, or any other kind of way to get around not quoting PMs.[/spoiler]
I don't see how this could violate the rule since all we are doing is checking facts with his statement. There is no real intent to gain other information than a 1 word answer.
FoS KGB, that looks like you are mafia and fishing for some information so you can gain for your fake claim
Questions like that seem awfully close to violating (at least the intent of) rule 2. [spoiler]2. Do not quote any PMs you receive from the Mod. The only things you may post (loosely paraphrasing) are your roles (and anything associated with them), and alignment, during the active game. Once the game has concluded, feel free to post the rest of your personal information. You may not post your win condition, how many words are in your role PM, or any other kind of way to get around not quoting PMs.[/spoiler]
is it? i was mislynched for (among other idiotic reasons) choosing a different color to post my claim in the ongoing rock 'n roll mafia game
skillfusniper33 wrote:well I am back.
I always hate having a VT claim, since most of the time they are a lie of some kind. He may also be 3rd party instead of Mafia which makes this difficult. I could really see someone having the roll of Spring or Fall.
I don't see how this could violate the rule since all we are doing is checking facts with his statement. There is no real intent to gain other information than a 1 word answer.
FoS KGB, that looks like you are mafia and fishing for some information so you can gain for your fake claim
i look like mafia for trying to determine whether or not his claim is BS? and a 3rd party having the role of spring or fall? what do you know that I don't?
Questions like that seem awfully close to violating (at least the intent of) rule 2. [spoiler]2. Do not quote any PMs you receive from the Mod. The only things you may post (loosely paraphrasing) are your roles (and anything associated with them), and alignment, during the active game. Once the game has concluded, feel free to post the rest of your personal information. You may not post your win condition, how many words are in your role PM, or any other kind of way to get around not quoting PMs.[/spoiler]
is it? i was mislynched for (among other idiotic reasons) choosing a different color to post my claim in the ongoing rock 'n roll mafia game
skillfusniper33 wrote:well I am back.
I always hate having a VT claim, since most of the time they are a lie of some kind. He may also be 3rd party instead of Mafia which makes this difficult. I could really see someone having the roll of Spring or Fall.
I don't see how this could violate the rule since all we are doing is checking facts with his statement. There is no real intent to gain other information than a 1 word answer.
FoS KGB, that looks like you are mafia and fishing for some information so you can gain for your fake claim
i look like mafia for trying to determine whether or not his claim is BS? and a 3rd party having the role of spring or fall? what do you know that I don't?
Your first statement confirms the second.
There is a possability for 3rd party always. I don't know anything about it but it would fit. The unloved season not being represented
Questions like that seem awfully close to violating (at least the intent of) rule 2. [spoiler]2. Do not quote any PMs you receive from the Mod. The only things you may post (loosely paraphrasing) are your roles (and anything associated with them), and alignment, during the active game. Once the game has concluded, feel free to post the rest of your personal information. You may not post your win condition, how many words are in your role PM, or any other kind of way to get around not quoting PMs.[/spoiler]
well the backgrounds white most of the text is black (or possibly relay dark green) but the bit that says the name and role is pink well pinky gold well gold and not at all pink but what do you expect me to say.