thechuck51 wrote:kgb007 wrote:thechuck51 wrote:I am White Spaceman, Vanilla Townie
vote kgb. I can see the reasoning for saf, IB, and TFO's vote as we don't want to end the day with a no lynch (and no information) but kgb just seems to want a bandwagon for the sake of a bandwagon.
really chuck? seems like an OMGUS vote against me now
Jonty votes you for being the most inactive after my
semi joke vote against gregwolf for inactivity and suggests to vote the least active, i oblige ...
What made your vote on gregwolf a "semi joke vote"?
Jonty voted me because he believed I was the least active (and he is probably right).
Saf voted me because I was the best candidate for a claim and info going into the night
IB and TFO voted for the same reasons as Saf
your vote for me seemed opportunistic. You just took Jonty's word that I was the least active? and why tack on the part about me modding your first game? I think its because you are making "semi joke votes" in order to avoid doing any scumhunting. At least those that came after you were willing to admit that they are voting for me just because we need a claim.
my vote on gregwolf was a semi joke vote bc i was currently voting him in another game and it's easier to keep my vote straight if it was against the same person in both games...
why do you think i "just took jonty's word" that you were least active? how do you know i didn't go back and confirm jonty's assertion? i tacked on the part of you modding my first game as a point that you know what you're doing in these games if you have the experience to mod a mafia game and being inactive seems about as good a strategy as any for mafia to go unnoticed D1
and my semi joke vote at least jump started the conversation again so you can't say it wasn't scum hunting if it engaged more experienced players who might be better at D1 scum hunting
Saf and IB's votes are just as opportunistic as my vote, even more so since each vote against you pushes you closer to a claim
also FOS at Stubbs
StubbsKVM wrote:Well, this game is just kinda slow. It would be pretty hypocritical for me to vote chuck for inactivity, so I won't.
he hasn't posted since the above on Friday, trying to dampen any bandwagon that might occur without getting too close to defending a possible scum buddy?
