Moderator: Clan Directors







If they finish their sets they'll count normally.Keefie wrote:They still have outstanding games in CL5, will removing them now have any affect on other clans ?

Shouldn't they stay in the rankings until their games are finished? If a clan "disbands" in the middle of a war, after all games are made, the war still counts, doesn't it?IcePack wrote:If they finish their sets they'll count normally.Keefie wrote:They still have outstanding games in CL5, will removing them now have any affect on other clans ?

This. Everyones score will be calculated normally for any finished wars / sets. Any incomplete sets / wars would have to be evaluated on a case by case basis.Swifte wrote:I assume what IcePack means is that anything they finish will continue to be calculated in to the F400 score calculations.. but the clan itself will no longer be listed in the final rankings...


Probably, I'll check. As long as your previous wars haven't decayed to muchGenoke wrote:last game from NC4 against RA has ended, so now we can get our official rank in the next update


I have:Genoke wrote:last game from NC4 against RA has ended, so now we can get our official rank in the next update

Those are the only ones except the 1 v 1 we lost, but I don't think it gets counted right?IcePack wrote:I have:Genoke wrote:last game from NC4 against RA has ended, so now we can get our official rank in the next update
RA Win
FALL Win
FISO Win
AQOH Win
I just checked, ATL's weight is 143. You won't pop onto the scoreboard until another war completes. If I'm missing any other completed wars, just let me know.
Good luck!
IcePack



You need to have 150 completed games to get onto the ranking.angola wrote:Can a clan get into the rankings with less than four wars completed? If we beat AFOS in the CC4 (which is looking very likely), will the fact that they are high-ranked help vault us onto the list?

Keefie wrote:You need to have 150 completed games to get onto the ranking.angola wrote:Can a clan get into the rankings with less than four wars completed? If we beat AFOS in the CC4 (which is looking very likely), will the fact that they are high-ranked help vault us onto the list?

We'll have 143 completed games after the war with AFOS. Guess it will take one additional war then?Bruceswar wrote:Keefie wrote:You need to have 150 completed games to get onto the ranking.angola wrote:Can a clan get into the rankings with less than four wars completed? If we beat AFOS in the CC4 (which is looking very likely), will the fact that they are high-ranked help vault us onto the list?
You need 150 weighted score.


Or a Random League result.hyposquasher wrote:We'll have 143 completed games after the war with AFOS. Guess it will take one additional war then?Bruceswar wrote:Keefie wrote:You need to have 150 completed games to get onto the ranking.angola wrote:Can a clan get into the rankings with less than four wars completed? If we beat AFOS in the CC4 (which is looking very likely), will the fact that they are high-ranked help vault us onto the list?
You need 150 weighted score.


You got to keep in mind decay as well. Depending on how long its been since those first finished wars completed, you might need some "buffer" to fill in some weight that decays out.Keefie wrote:Or a Random League result.hyposquasher wrote:We'll have 143 completed games after the war with AFOS. Guess it will take one additional war then?Bruceswar wrote:Keefie wrote:You need to have 150 completed games to get onto the ranking.angola wrote:Can a clan get into the rankings with less than four wars completed? If we beat AFOS in the CC4 (which is looking very likely), will the fact that they are high-ranked help vault us onto the list?
You need 150 weighted score.



It has affected us already actually. You can see from the latest rankings that our 82 games are only worth 75 weight, I imagine by the time the 60 games are entered from afos, total weight will still be around 125-130. Random League results will help, with 12 games each set, but I imagine it'll still be another month before we're ranked.Keefie wrote:I don't think ACE have been around for long enough for decay to affect them.