Vote safariguy
for totally missing my point. or delibaretly ignoring some parts of it?
virus90 wrote:
we needed a claim because we did not know anything and we had to get the discussion going, because else we wait 2 weeks for the counter to role down, and give the bad-guys a chance to vote someone of with 2-3 votes just like happened last time with edocsil. (not saying it necessarily were the bad guys who got the votes in that killed, but a kill was there and noone really wanted it).
safariguy5 wrote:
Did we learn nothing from the lynch yesterday? We cannot afford to wait too long or we could accidentally lynch people from deadline pressure. But honestly, this defensive post is more than enough for me to vote virus regardless of your definition of "enough pressure".
How is what i first said marked in blue any different for what you use against me. i am exactly saying the same, or is my use of english vague or off?
and about the number of votes, i am afraid i am just being realistic that it will take more days to get to a stage where it is possible to lynch anyone at all. for 1 reason because you still need a shitload of votes. 14 by my count for today. that probably would take the hole town to agree at this stage. and for reason 2. of the people alive not even everyone has bothered to post more then 1 message at all since the start of day 2, so i wonder if at this stage if all active people agree we would get enough votes for a lynch.
so yes i vote you, which is pretty useless (reference to next quote)since we need about 14 votes at this stage, but it is to make a point: and i quote:
virus90 wrote:
votes at this stage are only useful in proving your point and having a discussion, if you want answers from someone you probably gonna need more then 1 vote, because who the hell would be scared by 1 or 2 if you need over a dozen at this point?
to which i want to add that by "wanting answers" i mean answers or claims(which can be a form of answers in my opinion).