bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db [Mas]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Post Reply
dakky21
Posts: 2339
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Rijeka, Croatia

bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db [Mas]

Post by dakky21 »

I know games can sometimes became painful, but their deadbeating isn't really fair.

accused:
bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy

Game 13161368

All 3 deadbeat so cyan - kirilko gets all the troops. Yeah, this game should have ended in a 1v1v1 war anyway, but not like this.
User avatar
Vid_FISO
Posts: 1351
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Hants

Re: bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db

Post by Vid_FISO »

more missed moves in that game than a Battle Royale!
If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through
MrPinky
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:16 pm

Re: bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db

Post by MrPinky »

How is it an advantage for the team that 3 of them deadbeat...they lose out on LOTS of troops in these 3 rounds, and once one player has it all, he will not get as much deploy as the 4 combined used to get, and he will get only one spoil per round instead of 4.

Of course deadbeating ruins the fun in the game. But I just don't see it as a winning strategy and thus "cheating"
benga
Posts: 6925
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm

Re: bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db

Post by benga »

team 1 also int db, look at them, it works!

so team 2 is following the same strat
MrPinky
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:16 pm

Re: bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db

Post by MrPinky »

well...it works...in a 3 player game, if the other 2 teams think the one deadbeating is not a threat anymore, and therefore fight each other...but other than that, I can't really see a big advantage. I must admit im a rookie on that map though....you yourself are currently giving me a lesson on it :D
Masli
Posts: 3000
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 4:43 am
Gender: Male

Re: bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db [Mas]

Post by Masli »

mcgonagr & Enochs BarmyArmy haven't been online when they missed the turns, bragsie hasn't been online since 2013-12-12

I can understand that this looks intentional, but according to my info the turns have been missed because they where not online at all to play any of the turns.
In other words : Cleared
Image
benga
Posts: 6925
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm

Re: bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db [Mas]

Post by benga »

Did you check team 1 also?
Masli
Posts: 3000
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 4:43 am
Gender: Male

Re: bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db [Mas]

Post by Masli »

benga wrote:Did you check team 1 also?
1. This topic is not about team 1, so to answer you question : No
2. If you want it checked, make a new topic
3. Make sure the topic show's us evidence of the account(s) you want checked took turns in other games when that account missed the turns in the game you think they intentional deadbeated.
Image
User avatar
ChrisPond
Posts: 414
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: bragsie, mcgonagr, Enochs BarmyArmy intentional db [Mas]

Post by ChrisPond »

Masli wrote:
benga wrote:Did you check team 1 also?
1. This topic is not about team 1, so to answer you question : No
2. If you want it checked, make a new topic
3. Make sure the topic show's us evidence of the account(s) you want checked took turns in other games when that account missed the turns in the game you think they intentional deadbeated.
That's strange. I filed an e-ticket once about people in a 6 player singles game taking turns for their opponent and it turned into a witch hunt about every one involved in the game instead of noting the obvious that player A logged in as player B and then announced in chat that Player A took Player B's turn. 5 to 6 emails later I was told I should not log into player D's account to cover his turn in a different team game that we were both involved in as team mates. I was under the impression once a report was made, everyone and everything was checked out.
Post Reply

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”