the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

[Dukasaur]

[DoomYoshi]

2014-03-09 23:43:11 - whamBot: You say fucking, I say fuckingderrrrr

[targetman377]

happy Sunday!!! its my Sunday!!!! i don't want to start work tomorrow argg.

[muy_thaiguy]

Been watching the Incredibles lately, and wondering why, after over 10 years, it hasn't gotten a sequal when so many bad movies do. And it's not hard to do sequals for superhero movies either. Just look at all the Batman, Superman, Spiderman, and X-Men movies that come out. As a stand alone movie, it's atually pretty good, but would not mind seeing a sequal to it.

[targetman377]

Been watching the Incredibles lately, and wondering why, after over 10 years, it hasn't gotten a sequal when so many bad movies do. And it's not hard to do sequals for superhero movies either. Just look at all the Batman, Superman, Spiderman, and X-Men movies that come out. As a stand alone movie, it's atually pretty good, but would not mind seeing a sequal to it.

no sequals kill things unless its jurassic park

[jonesthecurl]

happy Sunday!!! its my Sunday!!!! i don't want to start work tomorrow argg.

Don't vcall me "argg".

[targetman377]

what i can't hear you over my bear i am having on MY SUNDAY!!!

[muy_thaiguy]

Been watching the Incredibles lately, and wondering why, after over 10 years, it hasn't gotten a sequal when so many bad movies do. And it's not hard to do sequals for superhero movies either. Just look at all the Batman, Superman, Spiderman, and X-Men movies that come out. As a stand alone movie, it's atually pretty good, but would not mind seeing a sequal to it.

no sequals kill things unless its jurassic park

Shrek 2.

[DoomYoshi]

what i can't hear you over my bear i am having on MY SUNDAY!!!

I can punch the dick off a bear.

[strike wolf]

Been watching the Incredibles lately, and wondering why, after over 10 years, it hasn't gotten a sequal when so many bad movies do. And it's not hard to do sequals for superhero movies either. Just look at all the Batman, Superman, Spiderman, and X-Men movies that come out. As a stand alone movie, it's atually pretty good, but would not mind seeing a sequal to it.

no sequals kill things unless its jurassic park

Shrek 2.

Shrek 2 wasn't that bad. It was a pale comparison to the first but it wasn't that bad. Jurassic Park: The Lost World was a horrible abomination that is best forgotten.

[jonesthecurl]

Best sequels I've seen were the second modern Batman movie,and ( a while earlier) Spiderman 2. Both excelled far the first and the third in their own series.

[muy_thaiguy]

Been watching the Incredibles lately, and wondering why, after over 10 years, it hasn't gotten a sequal when so many bad movies do. And it's not hard to do sequals for superhero movies either. Just look at all the Batman, Superman, Spiderman, and X-Men movies that come out. As a stand alone movie, it's atually pretty good, but would not mind seeing a sequal to it.

no sequals kill things unless its jurassic park

Shrek 2.

Shrek 2 wasn't that bad. It was a pale comparison to the first but it wasn't that bad. Jurassic Park: The Lost World was a horrible abomination that is best forgotten.

You see, I prefer Shrek 2 over the 1st. Not that the 1st is bad, just that Shrek 2 flows better. And the Nostalgia Critic agrees with me there.

I agree some sequals are horrible and should never have been made, but others are just as good, if not better than the one that came before them. Like "The Mask", not a great movie, but it was funny and entertaining. It's sequal though was just plain awful, it didn't even have any of the original characters and the quality was worse than the 1st. On the flip side, you have (in my opinion at least), the Lord of the Rings trilogy. The first one was by no means bad, but the 2nd and 3rd ones were better. Why? Big medieval style fantasy battles. Don't ask me why I like those, but I do.

[Quirk]

BPotW

[2dimes]

DO WANT!!!

[Quirk]

DO WANT!!!

http://en.paperblog.com/review-banana-c ... na-820952/

[AndyDufresne]

Here is a pictorial representation of this thread.




**Munches on a banana**


--Andy

[muy_thaiguy]

So, anyone else play or seen lets plays of South Park the Stick of Truth? South Park games in the past have been horrible, but I have only heard good things about this one, especially from fans of the show. It also reminds me of the movie in certain aspects, notably, the "Bigger, Longer, and Uncut" part. And it references just about everything too.

[DoomYoshi]

So, anyone else play or seen lets plays of South Park the Stick of Truth? South Park games in the past have been horrible, but I have only heard good things about this one, especially from fans of the show. It also reminds me of the movie in certain aspects, notably, the "Bigger, Longer, and Uncut" part. And it references just about everything too.

I was excited to play it in 2012. It took too long to come out, I don't care anymore.

[strike wolf]

Been watching the Incredibles lately, and wondering why, after over 10 years, it hasn't gotten a sequal when so many bad movies do. And it's not hard to do sequals for superhero movies either. Just look at all the Batman, Superman, Spiderman, and X-Men movies that come out. As a stand alone movie, it's atually pretty good, but would not mind seeing a sequal to it.

no sequals kill things unless its jurassic park

Shrek 2.

Shrek 2 wasn't that bad. It was a pale comparison to the first but it wasn't that bad. Jurassic Park: The Lost World was a horrible abomination that is best forgotten.

You see, I prefer Shrek 2 over the 1st. Not that the 1st is bad, just that Shrek 2 flows better. And the Nostalgia Critic agrees with me there.

I agree some sequals are horrible and should never have been made, but others are just as good, if not better than the one that came before them. Like "The Mask", not a great movie, but it was funny and entertaining. It's sequal though was just plain awful, it didn't even have any of the original characters and the quality was worse than the 1st. On the flip side, you have (in my opinion at least), the Lord of the Rings trilogy. The first one was by no means bad, but the 2nd and 3rd ones were better. Why? Big medieval style fantasy battles. Don't ask me why I like those, but I do.

If you were to eliminate the last 30 minutes of the Return of the King I might agree with you but the last 30 minutes were an abomination on the movie and on the entire trilogy. I never bothered with the second Mask. And I am not arguing that all sequels are worse than the original. I would say that Empire Strikes Back is at least as good as A New Hope and many consider it the best of the 6 (or 3 if you're one of those hard core deniers of the new trilogy) and going back to Lord of the Rings, the Two Towers was the best of them IMO.

I could agree that the second flows better than the original Shrek but the original Shrek was much funnier. Best scene in the second one is where they are breaking into the castle playing "I Need a Hero"

[strike wolf]

So, anyone else play or seen lets plays of South Park the Stick of Truth? South Park games in the past have been horrible, but I have only heard good things about this one, especially from fans of the show. It also reminds me of the movie in certain aspects, notably, the "Bigger, Longer, and Uncut" part. And it references just about everything too.

I don't know what you're talking about. South Park games are always funny.

[DoomYoshi]

http://www.newgrounds.com/collection/southpark

[targetman377]

Been watching the Incredibles lately, and wondering why, after over 10 years, it hasn't gotten a sequal when so many bad movies do. And it's not hard to do sequals for superhero movies either. Just look at all the Batman, Superman, Spiderman, and X-Men movies that come out. As a stand alone movie, it's atually pretty good, but would not mind seeing a sequal to it.

no sequals kill things unless its jurassic park

Shrek 2.

Shrek 2 wasn't that bad. It was a pale comparison to the first but it wasn't that bad. Jurassic Park: The Lost World was a horrible abomination that is best forgotten.

You see, I prefer Shrek 2 over the 1st. Not that the 1st is bad, just that Shrek 2 flows better. And the Nostalgia Critic agrees with me there.

I agree some sequals are horrible and should never have been made, but others are just as good, if not better than the one that came before them. Like "The Mask", not a great movie, but it was funny and entertaining. It's sequal though was just plain awful, it didn't even have any of the original characters and the quality was worse than the 1st. On the flip side, you have (in my opinion at least), the Lord of the Rings trilogy. The first one was by no means bad, but the 2nd and 3rd ones were better. Why? Big medieval style fantasy battles. Don't ask me why I like those, but I do.

If you were to eliminate the last 30 minutes of the Return of the King I might agree with you but the last 30 minutes were an abomination on the movie and on the entire trilogy. I never bothered with the second Mask. And I am not arguing that all sequels are worse than the original. I would say that Empire Strikes Back is at least as good as A New Hope and many consider it the best of the 6 (or 3 if you're one of those hard core deniers of the new trilogy) and going back to Lord of the Rings, the Two Towers was the best of them IMO.

I could agree that the second flows better than the original Shrek but the original Shrek was much funnier. Best scene in the second one is where they are breaking into the castle playing "I Need a Hero"

I will now some up the lord of the rings 3 movies in one word...

......
......
.....
....
....

WALKING wow a great movie great plot......oh wait.....nvm i would rather watch titanic then thouse movies cause at lest i get to see boobs and there is that one guy who hits the propeller

[strike wolf]

*Forces Targetman to walk for 10 hours straight and then has him compare the movies to walking.*

[targetman377]

Hey egal thanks for the little ride but could you put at least 2 moives away from the place we are supposed to be. we could just fly you there i mean its in our intrest to that the ring be destroiod. no no... i insite it would make a much better if we walked who knows there might be a giant battle that WE TAKE NO PART IN AND SLIP OUT THE BACK!!!!! yes yes... ahhh now why was that even in there??? oh well we may never no. lets walk some more we have a whole 3 movies to do this.... hey did you notice i don't have shoes on thats cool right i am a hobbet yeah lets just get back to walking also..


side note i once went to bar triva and the question was poised to the bar that stated in all 3 movies how many talking roles are the in the lord of the rings the whole bar guessed and i am like.... hmmmm RANDOM NUMBER 116 and then the answer popled up and my jaw dropped i guessed right on!!! then a some one walkes up and goes (note this is after i got my free beer) do you know gandolfs second romoved cousin?? i clanced back and said that was a compleat guess i no nothing about the movies i hate them actually. he walks away mad. me laughing drinking free beer thanks lord of the rings. (so your not all bad)

[Lance Thrust]

Been watching the Incredibles lately, and wondering why, after over 10 years, it hasn't gotten a sequal when so many bad movies do. And it's not hard to do sequals for superhero movies either. Just look at all the Batman, Superman, Spiderman, and X-Men movies that come out. As a stand alone movie, it's atually pretty good, but would not mind seeing a sequal to it.

no sequals kill things unless its jurassic park

Shrek 2.

Shrek 2 wasn't that bad. It was a pale comparison to the first but it wasn't that bad. Jurassic Park: The Lost World was a horrible abomination that is best forgotten.

You see, I prefer Shrek 2 over the 1st. Not that the 1st is bad, just that Shrek 2 flows better. And the Nostalgia Critic agrees with me there.

I agree some sequals are horrible and should never have been made, but others are just as good, if not better than the one that came before them. Like "The Mask", not a great movie, but it was funny and entertaining. It's sequal though was just plain awful, it didn't even have any of the original characters and the quality was worse than the 1st. On the flip side, you have (in my opinion at least), the Lord of the Rings trilogy. The first one was by no means bad, but the 2nd and 3rd ones were better. Why? Big medieval style fantasy battles. Don't ask me why I like those, but I do.

If you were to eliminate the last 30 minutes of the Return of the King I might agree with you but the last 30 minutes were an abomination on the movie and on the entire trilogy. I never bothered with the second Mask. And I am not arguing that all sequels are worse than the original. I would say that Empire Strikes Back is at least as good as A New Hope and many consider it the best of the 6 (or 3 if you're one of those hard core deniers of the new trilogy) and going back to Lord of the Rings, the Two Towers was the best of them IMO.

I could agree that the second flows better than the original Shrek but the original Shrek was much funnier. Best scene in the second one is where they are breaking into the castle playing "I Need a Hero"

Here are four definitive rulebreakers to the law of "Sequels Suck" (in no particular order):

1. Evil Dead 2
2. Hellraiser 2
3. Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan
4. Godfather 2

All of these outdid the original. Anyone care to disagree?