XenHu's Manhunt Mafia Game~ Mafia Win!

Guilty_Biscuit · Post by **Guilty_Biscuit** » Mon May 21, 2007 6:27 pm

Meh. I post here often enough. I make a point of not posting tripe in the mafia threads after what happened to Sherwood Forest. I suppose I could have posted a lot of trivial nonsense in all my mafia games but then we would have all my pointless posts to read through as well as yours

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Mon May 21, 2007 6:47 pm

Sorry, GB, you're my man and all, but you STILL haven't posted anything of value aside from why you were gone...

You FOSed everyone else who voted Mandalorian, which, at this point, was ALL of us... So that doesn't do much good.

And I'd like to know how you "gave us Mountainlion"... Are you saying we have TWO cops here??? If so, what is to keep you from not being paranoid???

Your not making much sense, man.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Mon May 21, 2007 8:33 pm

Alrighty....back from work.

Im not sure what im exactly supposed to say to the posts from anark, and from aimless about me. After my coming out party during tombstone, its like im expected to come up with something brillant. Truth be told i merely played a cop role creatively once i overplayed my hand. I wasnt under the impression that i hadnt been posting anything meaningful at all, but i do realize i have posted less than normal (i do have a 40 hr a week job that i did not have during school). Im not exactly sure what i should say because i think simply posting at this point in the thread, will probably only redirect some attention to me, when seemingly it had disapated in the thread a bit.

Now to some of the things in the game i guess ive noticed. Exile seems to be napping a lot like i am, i figure he will probably check in soon but neither of us have been all that active. I still think mountainlion was a little bit fishy in an earlier post, and jokingly i claimed he was like that in every game he plays... Strike did mess up earlier. Guilty didnt respond brillantly imo to some of the accusations toward him, and most importantly wicked is always scum. So for now i dont have anything to really change.

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Mon May 21, 2007 10:19 pm

GB is coming off scummier and scummier with his defense.

Either he or gt should be a good lynch target today; they're about my one and two at the moment. We should pick one.

MountainLion · Post by **MountainLion** » Mon May 21, 2007 11:11 pm

I don't understand why you're after me, Biscuit. Why won't you explain? Tonka was the first to vote me in this game as well. You guys trying to get me lynched? Neither of you have stated a solid reason, so why are you after me?

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Mon May 21, 2007 11:14 pm

vote: Guilty_biscuit

I don't see any real defense in your posts and what you have posted makes little sense. I have to agree with anarkist and others that you really haven't posted anything of value.

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Mon May 21, 2007 11:15 pm

MountainLion wrote:I don't understand why you're after me, Biscuit. Why won't you explain? Tonka was the first to vote me in this game as well. You guys trying to get me lynched? Neither of you have stated a solid reason, so why are you after me?

Another good point that I didn't mention

Guilty_Biscuit · Post by **Guilty_Biscuit** » Tue May 22, 2007 4:11 am

OK, seems that I need to make myself clear.

1) Re: Lack of posting this day.

I must assume that this lack of posting accusation only refers to day 3 because I have been quite active in this game.

This day started on Friday. I wasn't on the forums Saturday and Sunday which explains my lack of posting until Monday. Wicked accused me of posting elsewhere on Saturday and Sunday which isn't true as anyone can tell by looking at my previous posts.

so... FOS Wicked for claiming to have looked at my post history but obviously didn't look. This is checable by anyone.

2) Re: lack of substance to my posts this day.

I must assume that this lack of substance accusation only refers to day 3 because I have been responsible for a lot more original thought in my posts than the majority of players in this game. Especially as it was me that discovered and outed AK as Earl Cash (on day 1!). I was also against lynching him as I thought there was a good chance he was a vig (right again).

As for this day - all my posts have centred around saving myself from being lynched. I consider that to be one of the main duties of a good townie, not to bend over and allow yourself to be lynched. I want to win, and my team has less chance of winning if I'm dead (by virtue of having one less townie.) So I consider all my posts today to be very substantial.

3) Re: Mountainlion

I happen to believe that Mountainlion is mafia, my original suspicions were raised about him and wicked becuase they were confused about Moz being named Dr. but not being the Doc.

I was not confused about this because I am Dr. Pykeman (Townie) so I voted ML without explaining myself to see if anyone else would pick up on it (It is obvious now that not all towines are called Dr.) What makes him suspicious to me now is that no-one hopped onto ML on any of the occasions that I voted for him. If ML were town then I would expect Mafia to become involved in these seemingly random accusations. One example would be to lynch ML on the proviso that they lynch me if ML turned out to be town. That way they get 2 town lynched and 2 days wasted. I could go on, and on, but basically ML smacks of Mafia and I think needs to answer some questions.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue May 22, 2007 8:55 am

I never said you posted elsewhere on the weekend, I said you posted elsewhere more than you posted here, that's all.

And the reason no one jumped on ML was because you provided no proof.

You said, "he's scum". Well we need more than that to go on!!

And there was no "confusion" on my part over the doc. I raised that as a possibility only, since you never know how mods will run a game. I didn't harp on it, I just explained myself when asked, and I certainly wasn't pushing for a role claim!

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Tue May 22, 2007 9:01 am

Damn, Biscuit.... Good answers!!!

Well, I really don't know what to say...

Sounds to me that the town has to make a choice... Either lynch Guilty_Biscuit and if he is town, then lycnh Mountainlion, or lynch ML and then, regarding whatever he is, lynch the other...

Either of you guys willing to take one for the team to prove this?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue May 22, 2007 9:09 am

Guilty_Biscuit wrote: If ML were town then I would expect Mafia to become involved in these seemingly random accusations.

That makes no sense at all, unless it was a noob mafia, and I don't think there'd be noobs in this invite game (and the only one playing like one is strike). Have you played any non-noob games before GB?

Speaking of noobs, no one answered my previous question about strike, is he a noob? Like I said, didn't think there'd be any noobs in this game, but he's acting like one... maybe he reverted back after that slip up? Something about that just strikes me as odd, pun intended.

Guilty_Biscuit · Post by **Guilty_Biscuit** » Tue May 22, 2007 9:36 am

Actually it would be a very good move for one mafia member to follow up the accusation I made and help develop it into a lynch ML then GB situation. Add 2 night kills into the equation and the game would be left with 4 players & an almost certain win for the mafia. Very low risk for the one mafia member involved.

This is something I would expect experienced mafia to pick up on but noob mafia to miss.

How an experienced player like yourself fails to recognise this - especially after I spelled it out - is Foolish or Scummy Wicked.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Tue May 22, 2007 10:07 am

So, Guilty, you propse we lynch Mountainlion... And, if you are wrong, we lynch you?

Is that what you are implying?

XenHu · Post by **XenHu** » Tue May 22, 2007 10:18 am

Vote Count

2.Guilty_Biscuit(Anarkistsdream, Strike_wolf)

1.MountainLion(got tonkaed)

1.Strike_wolf(wicked)

1.got tonkaed(Aimless)

3. Not Voting(The1exile, Guilty_Biscuit, MountainLion)

The deadline is May 22, 7:30 PM EST(GMT-5)

With 8 Alive It Takes 5 To Lynch!

MountainLion · Post by **MountainLion** » Tue May 22, 2007 10:59 am

Damn Biscuit, you feel that strongly about me? I guess it's a question of what everyone else thinks is more likely: that I'm scum or he's scum. I'll roleclaim if need be.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue May 22, 2007 11:06 am

No GB, I think it's a total farce to expect that to happen on any level. I've been scum more times than I can count, and townie just as much, and I would never jump on a random accusation like that, whether I was townie or scum. Sorry, but your reasoning is flawed. BTW, before you read the wrong thing into this, I am not defending ML in any way, b/c I'm clueless as to what side he's on, rather I'm attacking your flawed logic.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Tue May 22, 2007 11:10 am

Guys, we have 6 hours.... We need to come to a census...

Wicked, what is your GUT FEELING right now?

Got Tonkaed, I'd like to hear your GUT FEELING too.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue May 22, 2007 11:10 am

Anarkistsdream wrote:So, Guilty, you propse we lynch Mountainlion... And, if you are wrong, we lynch you?

Is that what you are implying?

See this is ludicrous, and I hate when people say this in a game. GB has no clue whether ML is scum or not, and is taking a guess based on flawed logic. So if ML comes up town, we're not going to lynch our doc for making a bad call, that's insane. The fact that no one else has come forward to counterclaim doc makes me pretty sure GB is the doc, so while I might not agree with his theory, I'm not going to lynch him if he's wrong.

I do think since our numbers are dwindling, we do have to be more careful about our lynches.

Guilty_Biscuit · Post by **Guilty_Biscuit** » Tue May 22, 2007 11:47 am

I'm going to vote: Mountainlion for the reasons I've already stated. Plus you were on Nark's (presumed innocent) case on day 1. You voted for AK and delayed voting for Mandy. I'm sure you can defend yourself, so let's hear it. Time is short.

For the record, I never suggested a lynch ML then lynch me situation. I said the mafia would want that situation if ML was town. I didn't clear that up earlier when Nark asked because I was alowing some time for it to happen. It won't happen now, so that whole line is down the pan.

ML seems to me like the most likely person to be mafia at this time. I've given my reasons. And I also think ML should get the chance to defend himself because I don't know he's mafia for sure. I consider my reasons (combined) beter than looking for submariners. Who does everyone else think we should lynch and why?

XenHu · Post by **XenHu** » Tue May 22, 2007 11:53 am

Vote Count

2.Guilty_Biscuit(Anarkistsdream, Strike_wolf)

2.MountainLion(got tonkaed, Guilty_Biscuit)

1.Strike_wolf(wicked)

1.got tonkaed(Aimless)

2. Not Voting(The1exile, MountainLion)

The deadline is May 22, 7:30 PM EST(GMT-5)

With 8 Alive It Takes 5 To Lynch!

XenHu · Post by **XenHu** » Tue May 22, 2007 12:04 pm

Announcement:

If and when the deadline has passed, or you have reached a lynch, treat the rest of today/tonight as ‘twilight’, as I will be unable to post the death/no-lynch scene until tomorrow morning.

-X

MountainLion · Post by **MountainLion** » Tue May 22, 2007 12:04 pm

Guilty_Biscuit wrote:Plus you were on Nark's (presumed innocent) case on day 1. You voted for AK and delayed voting for Mandy. I'm sure you can defend yourself, so let's hear it.

First of all I delayed voting for Mandy because I thought if we let him talk he could give us some leads. That didn't happen, and in fact he was lynched before he could talk. I suppose letting him talk may not have helped anyway.

Second, I'm not finding what your talking about when you said "Nark's presumed innocent case on Day 1" Where is that? I didn't see anything on Day 1 from him that sounds like what you're talking about.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue May 22, 2007 12:08 pm

At this time, I'm still most suspicious of Strike, for reasons already stated. And no one has come forward to say he's a noob.

I'm also slightly suspicious of Ank for proposing the "lynch either ML or GB theory." Scum seem to suggest/prefer these "either/or" theories b/c they see it as a way to get rid of two townies at once, and lay the blame if it's a bad lynch on the person making the initial accusation (GB in this case), while they sit back and laugh.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue May 22, 2007 12:10 pm

Also both of the people I've mentioned have not unvoted GB after his doc claim. And strike hasn't been seen in awhile... he disappeared when the pressure was put on.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Tue May 22, 2007 12:12 pm

When did GB claim doc? Sorry, musta missed that.