Donelladan wrote:This kind of things can already be done using PM to selected people in a game. We are not really creating a new abuse by allowing this feature.
Yes, but the rules say that diplomacy is
allowed in game chat, so anyone who did what ka said would not technically be violating the rules, and therefore it would not be abuse. So you can be sure that people will do it.
And even though, I don't think it will be such a problem, how many times does it happen that several people of a game are currently typing and reading the chat, so that the editing will still be possible for the 1st player?
I've seen it happen, though not often. It can be common when you have someone who lives in southeast Asia and is many time zones off of the rest of his/her opponents.
Furthermore, simple make the feature in a way that, if another player write anything, previous can't edit. And it is fine.
That negates the obvious methods of abuse, but I wouldn't be instantly confident that it couldn't be misused. For example, imagine a scenario where Player X says to Player Y: "If you're around, respond, and then I'll tell you what we should do." Player Y responds, "I'm here," after which Player X posts his game plan and then deletes it five minutes later, after he's confident Player Y has seen it. Also, we would have to guard against the possibility that everyone will delete their last comment, allowing the person who made the first comment to then delete theirs. (So the system would have to know that it has been "responded" to even if the "response" is no longer stored in the server. This would be much easier if you could only edit and not delete.)