Moderator: Clan Directors
IcePack wrote:They all have CL6 designation on them, it's not hard at all to find the regular wars.
IcePack wrote:Won't start for a year? The very last round starts in March, which is 6 months away.
We group them together at the start so that they are not MIXED sporadically in with regular war results and are grouped 100% together so it's easier to find those results, and skip over them if you prefer.
Maybe at some point it can be looked at for additional filtering capability, but for now it's how we have to enter and track all the wars.
IcePack wrote:Yeah understood. I use the tab all the time, but I guess I don't find it that big if am issue because I want to see all the results without having to go thru 2+ tabs
Far as the matches, I count 18 appears it's all there to me?
betiko wrote:IcePack wrote:Yeah understood. I use the tab all the time, but I guess I don't find it that big if am issue because I want to see all the results without having to go thru 2+ tabs
Far as the matches, I count 18 appears it's all there to me?
Hum sorry, it isn t against low... It s against rgx (lhdd home set)
I don t know what size of screen you have, but it s a real pain in the ass from a mobile/tablet.
Also, if you go an check a clan, the results that count are the war results and final clan league ranking (any clan can beat any clan over so little games; skirmish by skirmish results are irrelevant, what is interesting is the final clan league ranking)
IcePack wrote:betiko wrote:IcePack wrote:Yeah understood. I use the tab all the time, but I guess I don't find it that big if am issue because I want to see all the results without having to go thru 2+ tabs
Far as the matches, I count 18 appears it's all there to me?
Hum sorry, it isn t against low... It s against rgx (lhdd home set)
I don t know what size of screen you have, but it s a real pain in the ass from a mobile/tablet.
Also, if you go an check a clan, the results that count are the war results and final clan league ranking (any clan can beat any clan over so little games; skirmish by skirmish results are irrelevant, what is interesting is the final clan league ranking)
I'm on a mobile or tablet 75% of the time (as I am right now)
I'll make sure the database is correct. Looks to be a display issue not that the two match ups aren't there.
Armandolas wrote:If the other wars were tagged like CL6 then it would be really easy to sort them by competition . For ex CC5 wars should have a CC5 Tag, and "friendly" wars should have a unique Tag as well.
Also the urls should be more accurate(like the latest improvement on searching games, where the url links specifically to the search)
betiko wrote:Armandolas wrote:If the other wars were tagged like CL6 then it would be really easy to sort them by competition . For ex CC5 wars should have a CC5 Tag, and "friendly" wars should have a unique Tag as well.
Also the urls should be more accurate(like the latest improvement on searching games, where the url links specifically to the search)
Yeah that sounds great.
By the way i never asked... In the F400 is there the same coeficient for a friendly or a CC5 war for example?
IcePack wrote:betiko wrote:Armandolas wrote:If the other wars were tagged like CL6 then it would be really easy to sort them by competition . For ex CC5 wars should have a CC5 Tag, and "friendly" wars should have a unique Tag as well.
Also the urls should be more accurate(like the latest improvement on searching games, where the url links specifically to the search)
Yeah that sounds great.
By the way i never asked... In the F400 is there the same coeficient for a friendly or a CC5 war for example?
Generally speaking CC5 is just a collection of regular wars that all follow the same rules.
Each war has an ID number, but I don't see us labeling every single war with tags? The war names are the tags
Not sure what you mean by URL being accurate
Far as F400 wars are all the same, so just cuz it is CC5 war doesn't give it any special treatment
IcePack wrote:If it's something that interests you, I say go for it. We've had plenty of ranking systems attempted over the years
IcePack wrote:betiko wrote:Armandolas wrote:If the other wars were tagged like CL6 then it would be really easy to sort them by competition . For ex CC5 wars should have a CC5 Tag, and "friendly" wars should have a unique Tag as well.
Also the urls should be more accurate(like the latest improvement on searching games, where the url links specifically to the search)
Yeah that sounds great.
By the way i never asked... In the F400 is there the same coeficient for a friendly or a CC5 war for example?
Generally speaking CC5 is just a collection of regular wars that all follow the same rules.
Each war has an ID number, but I don't see us labeling every single war with tags? The war names are the tags
Well, the CL6 have unique tags before the war name[CL6] wich makes them very easy to sort. So if i try to find only CC4 wars of a clan, then they will all be mixed with the "regular" wars. Thats does not happen in CL6 because it is properly labeled
Not sure what you mean by URL being accurate
This is what i mean accurate: https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php? ... &mode=find
This is like the old style.Not accurate when i share my search link for tofu wars in CL6: https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?mode=showclans2
Far as F400 wars are all the same, so just cuz it is CC5 war doesn't give it any special treatment
IcePack wrote:Regarding the tags in the title database, it's something we can discuss perhaps.
Leagues are labeled as on their own the individual matches don't qualify for privs and are part of the larger competition. While CC5 etc are fully qualifying wars.
Far as F400 goes, there wouldn't be any additional weighting of matches within a competition (like CC5) all wars are treated equally the same for ranking.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users