johnsonea & gendotte [ka]

[StreetWolf011]

Accused:

johnsonea
gendotte



The accused are suspected of:

Diplomacy Overkill



Game number(s):

Game 15174202



Comments:
Their first alliance was fine. Of course, I didn't agree with it, but still. The second, though, was completely unfair. The 2nd alliance between them started round 20. I'm making this post on round 25. They still have an alliance and both are very powerful. They accuse me of "provoking" Green to stop alliance and attacking him when he attacks blue. I had 1 comment on their first alliance about being "lame" so he ended it after one turn on HIS DECISION. Then attacks blue on HIS DECISION. This 5 turn alliance is completely ridiculous and uncalled for, especially when they are that strong.

[ZornSlayer]

Jonsea,

Unless you see they posted on each other's wall or PMed each other and did somehting 'secret', this is perfectly normal diplomatic wankery. My advice would be not to provoke them further, as it might make their bond stronger. These players have shown their alliances can shift at a moment's notice. It could well be that they go back at each other's throats here giving you time to recoup. You are not in a bad position right now, but trying to take Asia is tough, espeically with that big wad of red sitting there. Red is the one you got to watch out for, poised to plunge down your throat and take your cul-de-sac area once he's got enough troops to wipe you out. Good luck.

[owenshooter]

why are you reporting an announced alliance? who cares?-Jésus noir

[king achilles]

Diplomacy and/or truces depends on the people involved and how it progresses. As long as they are all discussed in the game chat, then the alliance is allowed.