Moderator: Community Team
Not sure it would matter.Metsfanmax wrote:Why was BG replaced?
He asked to be replaced.Metsfanmax wrote:Why was BG replaced?
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Tonka, I'm wondering why you were so quick to accept pixar's soft-claim.got tonkaed wrote:I'm ok with unvote Pixar as well. Last post from Pixar is enough for me to steer clear for the time being.
By unvoting him, are you suggesting that he has said enough, and we should find someone else to focus on?Mafiascum.net wrote:Softclaiming is not a particularly liked practice, as it gives the scum information about who is worth killing at Night while depriving the Town of the aspects of the role that are interesting to them.
You may want mtam to answer all questions in order for you to believe him, but as many others have stated, if he is indeed HP (which we must believe at this stage), it only helps scum to know how to get rid of him. Therefore, the question shouldn't be answered. That's just sound play.sempaispellcheck wrote:I don't think refusing to provide answers to questions that are asked of you is a pro-town thing to do - it makes you look suspicious, which leads to more questions, which can lead to a lynch, which would then be a wasted day (at best) if you're town.mtamburini wrote:Regardless if I can or cannot be targeted, this is not a pro town question to be asking.degaston wrote:Pixar's on the top of my scum list right now, but I'd still appreciate an explanation for whether you could, or could not be killed in the night.mtamburini wrote:I think we found our lynch for today.*Pixar* wrote:actually what do you guys think of mtam claiming Hairy Potter but the scum not targetting him? kind of fishy...
So, why do you keep doing it?
sempai

*Pixar* wrote:actually what do you guys think of mtam claiming Hairy Potter but the scum not targetting him? kind of fishy...
*Pixar* wrote:I think mtam's role is total BS. He knows if he claims something so powerful he won't get lynched as well as stating he wont get night killed either.
unvote vote mtam
You're claiming that you may have prevented a night kill, and you also knew that mtam claimed he couldn't be night killed, so why do you think it's fishy that Mtam was not night killed?*Pixar* wrote:If there is a possible 2 Night Kills for the scum I might be the reason why there was only one kill last night, Will claim if need be.

He couldn't keep up with the game. Kinda obvious he just wanted me dead to lessen the volume of posts ( he said so that is). The excuse was storr 3rd party.Metsfanmax wrote:Why was BG replaced?

There are many reasons why there could have been less kills. To be honest though we have only had 1 night. 1 kill could be the norm. There doesn't have to be a third party killing role or anything and the town vig. was lynched.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Can someone give an explanation of how recruitment works? Mafiawiki isnt particularly helpful on the subject.
I have suspicions that a low number of nightkills may be linked to a clan recruitment. However, I am very inexperienced and have never experienced something like this so am looking for guidance on the subject from an experienced player.

madmitch wrote:Well there you go you knuckleheads we just lost two townies. Pixar and I were right, mtam should have been hung even with the so called HP claim, VOTE MTAM
Definitely going to need to take a closer look at these two, I don't think anyone really likes the way mtam is playing, but HARRY POTTER. No cc yet, then I see no reason to vote or suspect him. Also, I don't recall seeing too many posts from either.charm wrote:MTam - I'm inclined to vote for you too, unless you bring forward something useful. You said you were taking care of Storr or something to that affect early on in Day 1 (don't ask me to quote it. my computer had a hard drive crash, so I'm limping on here). Then you talk about a present that Storr says he did not receive.
FOS MTam
I like this post from BG, I don't know why people think he is scummy I've been leaning town on him for most of the game. Not that it matters too much as now we have strike. Who I think will be easier to read because he keeps up with the game more, but I see no reason to pursue a lynch here.BGtheBrain wrote:fucking christ...
Sorry for making the mislynch more difficult for you.
YOu are an annoyance. You make the entire game about you and/or Mtam. You dont care about the town, you care about self-preservation. You havent fully claimed. You posted so much bullshit it makes it harder for the other 20 people to follow the game.
Also, you know damn well how I feel about the phrase "scum hunting" Its a stupid concept that you use to try to get your way. We're all here trying to lynch scum. Well, except you, who is looking to survive, right? I think you've played awful. I thin,k youre hurting town chances. So, what is a typical town win condition? You win when all threats to the town are eliminated. That includes you....
So, waste your vote, bc you know what? Most people think youre full of shit and shouldve been lynched. However, they dont grasp the full concept of the threat that a rogue 3rd party player is. Especially one like you. So, they get hung up on "We gotta find scum" IN a game this size, hell, Id argue any size, any player not looking out 100% for town, is harmful to town. So, when the chips are down and its the end of the game, and we need 1 vote to lynch scum and win the game, I dont want that 1 vote to be in your hands. Because you will do whatever it takes for YOU to win the game and not what is in the bestinterest of town....
You say this as you jump on the Pixar train...got tonkaed wrote:Lynching storr at this point seems to be a waste of resources. Given that night actions seemingly worked in town's favor, its not like we are hitting lylo tomorrow or something. People jumping on the storr/mtam trains at this point are either not really trying or shooting for easy lynches.
Vote Pixar.
Based on reasons above.
And then jump off immediately with only a soft-claim? vote get tonkaedgot tonkaed wrote:Not sure it would matter.Metsfanmax wrote:Why was BG replaced?
I'm ok with unvote Pixar as well. Last post from Pixar is enough for me to steer clear for the time being.
Blah. I hate soft-claims. I would vote you if not for wanting to vote tonka more. I think you might as well full-claim at this point personally.*Pixar* wrote:If there is a possible 2 Night Kills for the scum I might be the reason why there was only one kill last night, Will claim if need be.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Though I did not have a scummy feeling about BG, the point that wing raises is valid (read his previous post about BG dragging conversation into a wrong direction).StorrZerg wrote:@Dd5 bg wasn't scummy, he just doesn't have the time to play in such a high post count game.
hence the push on him to either 1, be replaced, or 2 start playing. others beside myself needed to bother him to get him to react
Pretty much says that he would rather have Pershy than Degaston, but doesn't vote... He says if enough people do it then I will. My question is: why? You could've just thrown your support behind a pershy or a deg lynch here, but instead you left it ambiguous, which is scummy to me.MudPuppy wrote:Too little too late.... We don't have the time to save Deg. Let's hope the scum reads on him were right. I'll stick around just in case we get more movement but I think the tribe has already spoken.dd515087 wrote:You seem to be the only one although there are like 5 or 6 people on...StorrZerg wrote:We have less than an hour to switch. I'm willing to move .
Oh well unvote, vote pershy let's see if this works
Then we have Endgame come in and make this vote... Are you fucking serious? This guy is scummy as all hell. I'm about to make a case on him soon (probably tomorrow)Endgame422 wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE PERSHY
Dd came and defended himself nicely.
Nothing of import here really, seems to understand flavor (which points to this game being based on the end of the Harry Potter series if Snape is town)MudPuppy wrote:Not sure I want to vote Severus out. Would rather vote Argus out.StorrZerg wrote:We have time, switch your vote. Sempai had 2 votes remember(deleted what happened in previous quote)
What does Epitaph's impasse mean? Does a tie equate to No Lynch?:Epitaph1 wrote:11. Deadlines WILL be set when I feel like they should. Pay attention to them. If a deadline is reached due to inactivity, the player with the most vote will be considered lynched.If a deadline is reached due to an impasse, I will consider it a no lynch and the game will go into night phase without a death.
No... How does that make any sense? Need 3, you plus sempai = 2... Maybe you're just bad at math. I won't count this against you for now.MudPuppy wrote:So, if Semp & I vote for the tie is that a No Lynch?StorrZerg wrote:4 votes pershy.
3 new ones to tie, 4 to lynch
So this vote really means nothing (no matter what MudPuppy believes is proper math), but also BG voted deg in the mean time, so even under MudPuppy's false math this means nothing.MudPuppy wrote:Unvote
Vote Pershy
OK Semp... It's on you. Hope a tie would result in a no lynch so we can get a read from Mad Eye tonight and not lynch Snape.
You fucking kidding me? You're "Harry fucking Potter" (allegedly) and you had half of the players convinced you were scum. You have no right to say shit to Deg, who is much more townie than you. The only reason you haven't been lynched is because you have no counter claim. Literally nobody has called you town besides that factmtamburini wrote:WOW YOU ARE MAD EYE MOODY AND THIS IS HOW YOU DECIDED TO PLAY YOU ARE SO BAD...StorrZerg wrote:He claimed sudo cop, mad eye moodymtamburini wrote:So why are people switching off deg?
*inserts wink face*
I have nothing against this vote. Plus (and forgive me if I'm wrong) isn't he cleared as double voter? (Although that doesn't necessarily make him town, but I've never seen a mafia double-voter on this site).sempaispellcheck wrote:Vote Pershy
Don't like that he nameclaimed, only - Snape was also a dick to Harry, and only turned out to be a hero at the very end.
FP'd by BG and Mud - would be shocked to see Barty Crouch here.
sempai
I have nothing against it, sometimes gut feeling is all you can go on.strike wolf wrote:I am not overly keen on either choice. I will vote Pershy to get my vote out there as I believe is more likely scum if only slightly but if tthere was more time Id have looked into Mudpuppy. The last page or so from him on Dega has come off kind of like a scum defending someone he knows to be town but even that is gut feeling.
aage wrote:unvote, vote Pershy
No reasoning at all? Just hopping on the bandwagon? Scummy AF.aage wrote:This day is fucking madness.
Okay... Still no reasoning behind the unvote... I don't understand this at all.MudPuppy wrote:lol... well this is going to give us some serious info to ponder.
Then we have this post from HotShot... Pretty useless, looks like he is trying to play both sides. Scummy.HotShot53 wrote:I would have preferred everyone switching to storr.... but since the choice is now between pershy and deg, deg's claim is fuller and more believeable, plus he has been more active and will probably be more help to town in the future, so I will unvote, vote pershy
Well... looks like I was FP and he has enough votes on him already, so I will unvote vote storr as the person who should have been lynched amongst the claimed people
Still don't get why people think that skimming is a scum tell.Endgame422 wrote: Thanks for the spoiler to check if i was skimming though dd.
Metsfanmax wrote:This question would be a fair one to ask if all of us actually believed you and you didn't have a history of making shit up and being intentionally confusing.mtamburini wrote: Explain to me the benefit to town if I can or cannot be targeted , vs the benefit to mafia knowing if I can or cannot be targeted.
Metsfanmax wrote:Have people played other games with Pixar? Is this playstyle abnormal for him?
Metsfanmax wrote:Why was BG replaced?
All your posts of D2 so far.Metsfanmax wrote:Still don't get why people think that skimming is a scum tell.Endgame422 wrote: Thanks for the spoiler to check if i was skimming though dd.
1. Fine, I understand, I wasn't around. Reasonable.Endgame422 wrote:1. I was voting dd until he showed up and made a legit post.
2. I jumped on the wagon thinking my vote would be wasted on him.
3. Also the early snape claim just seemed strange to me. No way he could have guessed that many votes would swing in the last few hours so why claim and make himself a target for N1?
4. Thanks for the spoiler to check if i was skimming though dd.
I find that it speaks for itself (i.e. that everyone who participated in it is an idiot and/or scum).Streaker wrote: -Nothing about the incredible end of D1. This should probably be more talked about but I have yet to do so as well.
All of the ongoing cases are shit.-No reads or contribution to any of the ongoing cases.
You seem to be mistaking quantity for quality. There's really very little to go through.There is a huge amount to go through (The case on Pixar, the wagon end of D1, Storr, and a few others), yet you choose to post these things instead.
As of this post: you.Who'd you like to lynch today/put pressure on today?
None.Thoughts on Pixar?