hwm?strike wolf wrote:We call hwm fake claims here generaly.
Moderator: Community Team
hwm?strike wolf wrote:We call hwm fake claims here generaly.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
degaston wrote:How would we clear it up the next day? I'm assuming that the scum were given safeclaims.Talapus wrote:Now the only other possibility is they are claiming these roles and are technically them because they use the polyjuice and have incpacitated the real players roles for a day. But that's a stupid move because you'd think we'd be able to clear it up the next day.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
Well, sure. I'm not pushing mtam today for a similar reason. But it leaves me kind of in the dark about where to go. I trust Pix even less than mtam or madmitch on the claim side, but pushing a lynch on that claim is a pretty ballsy move that I'm not sure we should make.strike wolf wrote:Them.
@Mets: I have to think Mtam is Harry and I dont plan on pressuring him to reveal everything.
Absolutely, everyone in the books took a hit or protected harry throughout the 7 books. With as many players in this game "the boy that lived" would make it through several nights and the person who fakeclaimed would be lynched the first night with all of us gunning for anyone anywhere that supported that players ideas earlier in the game.Metsfanmax wrote:Really though? Suppose you were Harry Potter and your role was something ridiculous like "you can vig two people every night." You'd really counterclaim in a game with 24 players?Talapus wrote:Not unreasonable. But if I were a player power role like one of those 3 characters ought to be and town and someone else claimed it I would counter in a heartbeat so we could lynch the scum and and go after whomever else looked like they were working with them.degaston wrote:What if the mod gave only one of the top three as a fake claim? Is that unreasonable?Talapus wrote:I still don't even get the discussion about possible fake claims of HP, Ron, and Hermoine. I mean it might, MIGHT be possible, but the possibility that the mod gave the 3 most prevelant roles as fake claims and not as town would floor me. But seriously if this happened then town is already screwed.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
My understanding from mafiascum.net is that a fake claim is chosen by the player, and may be disputed, but a safe claim is guaranteed not to be disputed - at least not the name part.strike wolf wrote:We call them fake claims here generaly.
You can't assume anything based solely on flavor. I think the mod would have to give out some power names as safe claims, or the game would be too easy to defeat by having everyone claim their name.Metsfanmax wrote:It's pretty reasonable to assume that Harry, Ron and Hermione are not going to be scum fakeclaims. That would be fucking with the flavor way too much.
There's an example from the books where a character stays polyjuiced for most of the year. Yeah, it was Mad Eye/Barty, but I think it was BG that already mentioned this earlier anyway. The point is, that I think it's dangerous to assume that an uncontested name is enough to verify that someone is who they say they are.Talapus wrote:Purely based on flavor, but polyjuice is very temporary. So even if they had the ability to incapacitate the real player from playing or claiming their role while someone used a polyjuice formula you would think because it's so temporary that even a game like this would only allow the effects to remain for a game day. Then next game day we hear otherwise as someone I'm sure would say something.degaston wrote:How would we clear it up the next day? I'm assuming that the scum were given safeclaims.Talapus wrote:Now the only other possibility is they are claiming these roles and are technically them because they use the polyjuice and have incpacitated the real players roles for a day. But that's a stupid move because you'd think we'd be able to clear it up the next day.
I have not objected to that question. Pixar did a bad job of answering it.degaston wrote: You complain that "Too many people are looking at "what" people have done, and not 'why'", but when I posted:You seem to think that these aren't valid questions. I'm getting pretty sick of this idea that you can't question a strong claim when they do something scummy. Here's an idea - how about the strong roles start playing like they're actually trying to help the town? If you don't want me to question your actions, then don't do things that are questionable.degaston wrote:pixar needs to explain why he protected mtam, and then voted for him again, and was surprised that he wasn't attacked, and how he even knows that he wasn't attacked.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
The toad thingmadmitch wrote:@ wing what the hell are you talking about grav???
Umm... storr himself says he's third party and not town.madmitch wrote:meant to said did not trust him.@mudpuppy good point about magically impaired Dobby but I doubt that,and what makes you so sure storr is not town,how would you know that? FOS against you!!!!