Moderator: Community Team

Why do you keep saying that? I certainly never said it and believe it to be false.aage wrote:3. you can't cure someone who was targeted by the mafia night kill;
Most likely people to be voldemortaage wrote:Reasons for this particular list?mtamburini wrote:9. Endgame422
10. Streaker
16. dazza2008
17. MudPuppy
22. dd515087
24. charm
These are the people I would lynch today, streaker being more at the end of the list.
I'm basing it on the fact thatMudPuppy wrote:Why do you keep saying that? I certainly never said it and believe it to be false.aage wrote:3. you can't cure someone who was targeted by the mafia night kill;
Are you saying it is inconceivable or unlikely that there are scum who can cast Sectumsempra? If so, what are you basing that conclusion on???
I asked for your thoughts on my lynch on dazza and you acted like a baby not wanting to speak to me so f*ck you 2StorrZerg wrote:unvote
vote mtamburini
I'm willing to play chicken with you.
Your going to act like a baby right now that's fine. Why don't you attempt to play the game and be helpful. You want discussion, it's a 2 way street.
Shocking when someone plays your game you get upset. You been dodging for days sack upmtamburini wrote:I asked for your thoughts on my lynch on dazza and you acted like a baby not wanting to speak to me so f*ck you 2StorrZerg wrote:unvote
vote mtamburini
I'm willing to play chicken with you.
Your going to act like a baby right now that's fine. Why don't you attempt to play the game and be helpful. You want discussion, it's a 2 way street.

You accuse of me not playing the game and not starting discussion when I have. Im just not PLAYING YOUR GAME which makes you mad because Im not doing what you want me to do, so i say f*ck you and your accusationStorrZerg wrote:Shocking when someone plays your game you get upset. You been dodging for days sack upmtamburini wrote:I asked for your thoughts on my lynch on dazza and you acted like a baby not wanting to speak to me so f*ck you 2StorrZerg wrote:unvote
vote mtamburini
I'm willing to play chicken with you.
Your going to act like a baby right now that's fine. Why don't you attempt to play the game and be helpful. You want discussion, it's a 2 way street.

Tambo, you think I'm mad lol. I like pro town shit, you are being a dick to people directly and withholding information during which everyone is fully claimed but you. I'm antagonizing you because of how you are acting now. Because asking nicely hasn't done shot with you, so might as well sink to your level.mtamburini wrote:You accuse of me not playing the game and not starting discussion when I have. Im just not PLAYING YOUR GAME which makes you mad because Im not doing what you want me to do, so i say f*ck you and your accusationStorrZerg wrote:Shocking when someone plays your game you get upset. You been dodging for days sack upmtamburini wrote:I asked for your thoughts on my lynch on dazza and you acted like a baby not wanting to speak to me so f*ck you 2StorrZerg wrote:unvote
vote mtamburini
I'm willing to play chicken with you.
Your going to act like a baby right now that's fine. Why don't you attempt to play the game and be helpful. You want discussion, it's a 2 way street.



I still think mad and mud likely scum buddies... I have no idea why the stolen vote was put on mad, an argument could be made on either side of scum trying to get the quick lynch or scum trying to scare people off of lynching a scum. The only previous time the stolen vote was used, it was to get a town (deg I think it was) to L-1. But mad's claim is just mad and doesn't make any sense.StorrZerg wrote:Anyone wanna talk about virus, mafia vote, madmitch situation?
You should want to lynch dazza then, also end should be in your sights as well for his comments about confirming people, im pretty sure theres at least one between charm and mudpuppy.HotShot53 wrote:I still think mad and mud likely scum buddies... I have no idea why the stolen vote was put on mad, an argument could be made on either side of scum trying to get the quick lynch or scum trying to scare people off of lynching a scum. The only previous time the stolen vote was used, it was to get a town (deg I think it was) to L-1. But mad's claim is just mad and doesn't make any sense.StorrZerg wrote:Anyone wanna talk about virus, mafia vote, madmitch situation?
As for virus, I started the day thinking he was the most likely scum VT... but he has been a bit more towny today, and agrees that mad & mud are likely scum. (Although he hasn't voted for either of them yet).
For the mtam vs storr (and the world) fight... not sure why mtam isn't fully claiming... could be he has a legitimate reason that the info would help scum too much, or could just be because he is HP, won't be lynched, and doesn't care what anyone thinks since he is the smartest player in the world. Since he doesn't seem to want to tell us, and he's not going to be lynched, we should all try to get along and lynch actual scum instead of continuing the fight.
FP by more fighting
If 2 die in the night yes. If 6 mafia start.dazza2008 wrote:Do we really think a mislynch can lose it today? I never though the mafia numbers would be so high.
I was hoping Mitch would post something useful. I can't tell if he is scum or just being weird. I still don't trust mudpuppy. Endgame also is still a suspect in my opinion.


I believed the threat.mtamburini wrote:@storr Were you not scared you were going to die?

The virus unvote was part of what made him sound more towny today... and I discussed the stolen vote. Was there another vote discussion I missed?StorrZerg wrote:Hotshot you avoided the vote discussion which I was bringing up. Why
You didn't take a stance on madmitch. And you are vague about virus.HotShot53 wrote:The virus unvote was part of what made him sound more towny today... and I discussed the stolen vote. Was there another vote discussion I missed?StorrZerg wrote:Hotshot you avoided the vote discussion which I was bringing up. Why

Aye. I guess it might be close then. We need to get this right then. If it was not so close lynching me would maybe be good just to clear or catch a scumbag. Hopefully Mitch will actual post something that makes sense then we can decide from there.StorrZerg wrote:If 2 die in the night yes. If 6 mafia start.dazza2008 wrote:Do we really think a mislynch can lose it today? I never though the mafia numbers would be so high.
I was hoping Mitch would post something useful. I can't tell if he is scum or just being weird. I still don't trust mudpuppy. Endgame also is still a suspect in my opinion.
If one dies in the night it's sketch.
13 alive tomorrow
5 mafia vs 7 town 1 3rd party
town loses a vote pitting them even, then towns trust in me if I side mafia. Or not.


My vote is still on madmitch, so I'd say that's my stance. The stolen vote could be used either way... but if madmitch had an actual real claim he would have made it by now, so it looks to me like he screwed up trying to fake claim something or another (he still hasn't made an actual claim with a game-play affecting role).StorrZerg wrote:You didn't take a stance on madmitch. And you are vague about virus.HotShot53 wrote:The virus unvote was part of what made him sound more towny today... and I discussed the stolen vote. Was there another vote discussion I missed?StorrZerg wrote:Hotshot you avoided the vote discussion which I was bringing up. Why
I was pretty straight forward with my thoughts on the vote. Additionally with how close the game is currently.