subtleknifewield wrote: So which Chinese customs would YOU discard?
Moderator: Community Team
subtleknifewield wrote: So which Chinese customs would YOU discard?
Most of them have been discarded already. The Imperial system of examinations, Confucian education, god worship and ancestor worship (for the most part) are all gone.subtleknifewield wrote:subtleknifewield wrote: So which Chinese customs would YOU discard?
Other than Switzerland, almost no one in any other developed nation is capable of legally owning a gun. In the UK, for example, they can only be owned by farmers (for reasons such as pest control) or for sport. I believe it's the same pretty much everywhere.subtleknifewield wrote:restrict it to those who are most likely to responsibly use them--a system which as I recall is already being used in other first-world nations.
khazalid wrote:
the school may have had a no gun policy, but i'm willing to bet the local wal-mart sure as f*ck didn't. lrn2read dy

I point to Germany, actually, for this. https://books.google.com/books?id=oD46J ... &q&f=false If you want to read the background, read from there (page 314), or if you want to skip to the current law, scroll down to nearly the bottom of page 315. This is essentially the sort of restriction I am suggesting.mrswdk wrote:Other than Switzerland, almost no one in any other developed nation is capable of legally owning a gun. In the UK, for example, they can only be owned by farmers (for reasons such as pest control) or for sport. I believe it's the same pretty much everywhere.subtleknifewield wrote:restrict it to those who are most likely to responsibly use them--a system which as I recall is already being used in other first-world nations.
I mean, what other 'responsible uses' for guns can you think of?
read the OP again.Phatscotty wrote:khazalid wrote:
the school may have had a no gun policy, but i'm willing to bet the local wal-mart sure as f*ck didn't. lrn2read dy
According to Wikipedia, self-defense is not accepted as a reason for buying a gun in Germany. In Germany you can basically only buy a guy for sporting use, or if you are an especially exposed person (e.g. money courier, politician) who is in more danger than the average citizen.subtleknifewield wrote:Lol Scotty XD
I point to Germany, actually, for this. https://books.google.com/books?id=oD46J ... &q&f=false If you want to read the background, read from there (page 314), or if you want to skip to the current law, scroll down to nearly the bottom of page 315. This is essentially the sort of restriction I am suggesting.mrswdk wrote:Other than Switzerland, almost no one in any other developed nation is capable of legally owning a gun. In the UK, for example, they can only be owned by farmers (for reasons such as pest control) or for sport. I believe it's the same pretty much everywhere.subtleknifewield wrote:restrict it to those who are most likely to responsibly use them--a system which as I recall is already being used in other first-world nations.
I mean, what other 'responsible uses' for guns can you think of?
As for responsible use, guns can still be used for self-defense.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
lawlKoolBak wrote:Our worst mass murder was caused with fucking airplanes...didnt hear you whining nonamerican bastards bitching about airtravel.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Batman resorts to violence because he knows his argument is weak. Selling meth in stores is not the answer.Phatscotty wrote:khazalid wrote:
the school may have had a no gun policy, but i'm willing to bet the local wal-mart sure as f*ck didn't. lrn2read dy
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

-------YOU'RE RIGHT ,THIS ISN'T THE OLD WEST...THERE WAS A CODE OF HONOR BACK THEN. EVEN AMONG THIEVES...BACK THEN, IT WAS ONE ON ONE IN THE STREET...EACH WITH A GUN. NOT WALKING INTO PLACES,WITH THE OBJECT TO KILL,KILL,KILL TO GET YOUR NAME MENTIONED WORLDWIDE. AGAINST THOSE THAT CAN'T FIGHT BACK...I KNOW BLAME FLAGS,GUNS,ETC...NOT THE ONES SEEKING FAME...IN AN UNDIGNIFIED ACT...subtleknifewield wrote:Lol Scotty XD
As for responsible use, guns can still be used for self-defense. Just because it isn't a lawless wild west
Is your entire world view based on some warped combination of Fox News and Hollywood movies?ConfederateSS wrote:-------YOU'RE RIGHT ,THIS ISN'T THE OLD WEST...THERE WAS A CODE OF HONOR BACK THEN. EVEN AMONG THIEVES...BACK THEN, IT WAS ONE ON ONE IN THE STREET...EACH WITH A GUN. NOT WALKING INTO PLACES,WITH THE OBJECT TO KILL,KILL,KILL TO GET YOUR NAME MENTIONED WORLDWIDE. AGAINST THOSE THAT CAN'T FIGHT BACK...I KNOW BLAME FLAGS,GUNS,ETC...NOT THE ONES SEEKING FAME...IN AN UNDIGNIFIED ACT...subtleknifewield wrote:Lol Scotty XD
As for responsible use, guns can still be used for self-defense. Just because it isn't a lawless wild west...ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...
OK, I can't even make sense of half of what you're saying here :VConfederateSS wrote:-------YOU'RE RIGHT ,THIS ISN'T THE OLD WEST...THERE WAS A CODE OF HONOR BACK THEN. EVEN AMONG THIEVES...BACK THEN, IT WAS ONE ON ONE IN THE STREET...EACH WITH A GUN. NOT WALKING INTO PLACES,WITH THE OBJECT TO KILL,KILL,KILL TO GET YOUR NAME MENTIONED WORLDWIDE. AGAINST THOSE THAT CAN'T FIGHT BACK...I KNOW BLAME FLAGS,GUNS,ETC...NOT THE ONES SEEKING FAME...IN AN UNDIGNIFIED ACT...subtleknifewield wrote:Lol Scotty XD
As for responsible use, guns can still be used for self-defense. Just because it isn't a lawless wild west...ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...
the logic, or lack of logic here, isn't about the ingredients of meth. It's about the farce implicating the access of guns in stores, specifically wal-mart and how their policy 'sure the f#%k didn't'. Trying to backpedal to an absolutely sarcastic OP written by someone else isn't going to help you deal with what was written by youkhazalid wrote:read the OP again.Phatscotty wrote:khazalid wrote:
the school may have had a no gun policy, but i'm willing to bet the local wal-mart sure as f*ck didn't. lrn2read dy
you're right btw. meth is simple enough to make with the right ingredients. might as well start selling it in wal-mart because logic.
bravo.

-------You are the one,who tried to say America is not as worse in the 21st cen. ,as compared to the 19th cen. You must be as blind as you are stupid,to live in today's USA. Make a remark like that. When people of the 19th cen. had morals,ethics,and honor. TODAY THE USA HAS NONE OF THESE. Are you going to get rid of freedom of religion as well? Because that seems to be the cause of more and more of these shootings. Michigan has the worst school killing of all time. BATH,Mi. A person lost his grip on power over a community. Took it out on the people(children) of BATH. Blew up the school. I guess your background checks would have stopped such a tragedy.subtleknifewield wrote:OK, I can't even make sense of half of what you're saying here :VConfederateSS wrote:-------YOU'RE RIGHT ,THIS ISN'T THE OLD WEST...THERE WAS A CODE OF HONOR BACK THEN. EVEN AMONG THIEVES...BACK THEN, IT WAS ONE ON ONE IN THE STREET...EACH WITH A GUN. NOT WALKING INTO PLACES,WITH THE OBJECT TO KILL,KILL,KILL TO GET YOUR NAME MENTIONED WORLDWIDE. AGAINST THOSE THAT CAN'T FIGHT BACK...I KNOW BLAME FLAGS,GUNS,ETC...NOT THE ONES SEEKING FAME...IN AN UNDIGNIFIED ACT...subtleknifewield wrote:Lol Scotty XD
As for responsible use, guns can still be used for self-defense. Just because it isn't a lawless wild west...ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...
Now see, this i an example of someone doing something constructive about it...
https://www.change.org/p/congress-impro ... QUBPLRY%3D
interesting conception of farce you got there, donald.Phatscotty wrote:the logic, or lack of logic here, isn't about the ingredients of meth. It's about the farce implicating the access of guns in stores, specifically wal-mart and how their policy 'sure the f#%k didn't'. Trying to backpedal to an absolutely sarcastic OP written by someone else isn't going to help you deal with what was written by youkhazalid wrote:read the OP again.Phatscotty wrote:khazalid wrote:
the school may have had a no gun policy, but i'm willing to bet the local wal-mart sure as f*ck didn't. lrn2read dy
you're right btw. meth is simple enough to make with the right ingredients. might as well start selling it in wal-mart because logic.
bravo.