Moderator: Community Team
A picture says a thousand words.mrswdk wrote:I guess you saw a couple of reports on FOX News and as a result know way better than me.
I do live in England, and did so at the time of the riots.jimboston wrote:I guess you claim you live in England.(?)
You mean the people who said Birmingham, UK is a Muslim city which Christians can't enter?I guess you claim you know more than American media.
I thought I was expressing something which was already clearly established years ago. Go do your own reading.I guess you make statements with no support... no links
from other sources agreeing with you.
I wouldn't have said that before you joined in with this thread, but I would now.So therefore you know way better than me?
Those people don't know much about the 2012 riots.Would most people generally call those riots "race riots" in these same vein as
race riots in other parts of the world? Yes.
You are now Player to me.mrswdk wrote:
I wouldn't have said that before you joined in with this thread, but I would now.
No I don't. Duk's point was about racial harmony and tolerance, one sign of which was that Canada doesn't have race riots. If London doesn't have race riots either then my point is totally valid. London is also a very tolerant place.jimboston wrote:Dukasuar stated Canada was better (in part) because he's never seen a Race Riot there. Fine. You said England never had "race riots"... trying to counter his argument. However London has had riots recently, so even if you win the argument, and those London riots were not "race riots", you still lose the point of your argument.
Says the guy from a city with a garbage/snow pile that lasted until... August?jimboston wrote:Weather?Dukasaur wrote:but when I take Canada's 2nd or 3rd place ranking across all of these things, it really doesn't get any better than here.
... um sounds like a "race riot".mrswdk wrote: the initial rioters as a 'protest' against racial profiling by the police, but rapidly spiraled into opportunistic looting in London and other cities,
So non-race riots are OK?mrswdk wrote:And in any case:
No I don't. Duk's point was about racial harmony and tolerance, one sign of which was that Canada doesn't have race riots. If London doesn't have race riots either then my point is totally valid. London is also a very tolerant place.jimboston wrote:Dukasuar stated Canada was better (in part) because he's never seen a Race Riot there. Fine. You said England never had "race riots"... trying to counter his argument. However London has had riots recently, so even if you win the argument, and those London riots were not "race riots", you still lose the point of your argument.
I forgot about that.DoomYoshi wrote:
We've had riots in Canada. When the Canucks lost the Stanley Cup to the Bruins.
Duk's point was about racial harmony. In the context of his point it is specifically race riots that matter, not riots of any kind.jimboston wrote:So non-race riots are OK?
I guess ignorance is blissful.... oh and BTW, I still maintain they were race riots.
Posh f*ck.mrswdk wrote:What's all this 'in Europe‘? Living in different parts of the UK I've never seen a pay-to-use public restroom or any houses/apartments with bars on the windows.

And my school didn't have metal detectors at the main doors either!iAmCaffeine wrote:Posh f*ck.mrswdk wrote:What's all this 'in Europe‘? Living in different parts of the UK I've never seen a pay-to-use public restroom or any houses/apartments with bars on the windows.