Moderator: Community Team
Rose and tim don't care for my claim. It doesn't provide any information to them.*Pixar* wrote:Has streak claimed yet? or did I miss it
must then be a fake towniemadmitch wrote:@ Pixar the slime princess would be a perfect scum fake claim because reading about her you find out she has Finn as a fake husband and Jake as a fake brother in law . I got to stick to my guns this time and keep my vote where it is.
White Rose, Answer my question please, or explain why answering the question is not beneficial.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose we may have used up one of mafia's fakeclaims. It is advantegeous for mafia to have as much choice over fakeclaims.
I am confused by your play. Do you see it as beneficial to permantly obstruct the search for information? You have no way of knowing Tims alignment and previously said that you werent against his lynch (just prefer to lynch Streaker or I), so why do you defend Tim over everything? You keep creating petty arguments against the majority of players, as we cant all be mafia there is no logical reason for doing this. Additionally even if Streaker or I are mafia, we would be blending in and the majority if our posts would be wel meaning anyway.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose, Answer my question please, or explain why answering the question is not beneficial.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose we may have used up one of mafia's fakeclaims. It is advantegeous for mafia to have as much choice over fakeclaims.
I am confused by your play. Do you see it as beneficial to permantly obstruct the search for information? You have no way of knowing Tims alignment and previously said that you werent against his lynch (just prefer to lynch Streaker or I), so why do you defend Tim over everything? You keep creating petty arguments against the majority of players, as we cant all be mafia there is no logical reason for doing this. Additionally even if Streaker or I are mafia, we would be blending in and the majority if our posts would be wel meaning anyway.
Tim, I built a case and voted for you prior to you saying "lynch me". I fail to see how you did anything. Thats precisely the problem, all you have done this game is cry blue murder without actually contributing to the scum hunt.TimWoodbury wrote:and also ps the whol elynch me lynch e it worked exactly as i expected, i knew someone would jump teh gun and start saying okay lets do it thats exactly what you and streaker did
Above is my first post of the day. I then later made a case against Tim which is the case that has brought him to L-1.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:What I have noticed reading through, is that Kratos and Tim seemed to be trying to avoid a Dakky lynch by voting Mitch instead. So FOS on them. I dont see much to be learnt from Dakky's post now we know his alignment to be honest.kratos644 wrote:Mitch and Dakky both look pretty scummy right now. Dakky for the blatant BW and Mitch for the reasons laid out above by White Rose. That was a great catch by the way. I didn't even notice the backing off he made after your post, I just noticed that I didn't like the end of your post at the time. While I'm not taking you off my radar 100% yet, White Rose, I do believe you have fallen down on the list of good D1 lynches. While I could currently go either way depending on how the day progresses, for now I'm feeling Unvote, Vote Mitch.
For now I feel like this would provide us more info than a Dakky lynch. If Mitch turns up scum we have an obvious D2 target and if he doesn't we can look at Dakky.
Earlier today I made the above post. I had been hoping to hear from Kratos before considering voting for him. This is an opportunity that I am not going to get.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:For the record i would willingly vote Kratos. He was active D1, I suggested he was scum in my first post, he the disappeared.......
Ok Streaker. Your comment makes no sense.Streaker wrote:
Beware of wing, his play is inconsistent of a good town play. Indecisive for him, I noted it at the start of the day, but now again when he was considering pushing Kratos instead of Tim.

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose, Answer my question please, or explain why answering the question is not beneficial.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose we may have used up one of mafia's fakeclaims. It is advantegeous for mafia to have as much choice over fakeclaims.
I am confused by your play. Do you see it as beneficial to permantly obstruct the search for information? You have no way of knowing Tims alignment and previously said that you werent against his lynch (just prefer to lynch Streaker or I), so why do you defend Tim over everything? You keep creating petty arguments against the majority of players, as we cant all be mafia there is no logical reason for doing this. Additionally even if Streaker or I are mafia, we would be blending in and the majority if our posts would be wel meaning anyway.
answer to your question is no.....happy now?WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose, Answer my question please, or explain why answering the question is not beneficial.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose we may have used up one of mafia's fakeclaims. It is advantegeous for mafia to have as much choice over fakeclaims.
I am confused by your play. Do you see it as beneficial to permantly obstruct the search for information? You have no way of knowing Tims alignment and previously said that you werent against his lynch (just prefer to lynch Streaker or I), so why do you defend Tim over everything? You keep creating petty arguments against the majority of players, as we cant all be mafia there is no logical reason for doing this. Additionally even if Streaker or I are mafia, we would be blending in and the majority if our posts would be wel meaning anyway.
Is that an answer to question A or B?the white rose wrote: answer to your question is no.....happy now?