strike wolf wrote:Forgive me if I am wrong but I thought characters were not alignment indicative?
They're not, but in this game it happened to be. Believe it or not.
Moderator: Community Team
strike wolf wrote:Forgive me if I am wrong but I thought characters were not alignment indicative?
TimWoodbury wrote:
i saw where people was speculating you claimed vig didnt ever see you say till now that you WAS vig so with that im going to unvote
dakky21 wrote:strike wolf wrote:Forgive me if I am wrong but I thought characters were not alignment indicative?
They're not, but in this game it happened to be. Believe it or not.
benga wrote:dakky is lawys such an easy target, he seems to being able to provoke much interest about his alignment/sex preferences
benga wrote:Streaker wrote:benga wrote:dakky is lawys such an easy target, he seems to being able to provoke much interest about his alignment/sex preferences
Do you want to lynch him?
You have dirty mind, I like it!
benga wrote:Streaker wrote:benga wrote:dakky is lawys such an easy target, he seems to being able to provoke much interest about his alignment/sex preferences
Do you want to lynch him?Streaker wrote:TimWoodbury wrote:virus90 wrote:havent been in most of the games lately, just a few. so why is dakky scum "again" according to you? (end wing?) i dont see it from the post your referring to.
because dakkys ass was skum in the last game so i also agreevote dakky because he must be skum due to ebing skum in last active game
Are you serious, or do you consider this a joke vote/post?
Seems like streaker is very interested in lynching dakky. Dakky must feel beloved by the whole bunch!
benga wrote:madmitch wrote:dakky21 wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Endgame422 wrote:dakky21 wrote:2. You are unconcerned with hurting towns chances if it means your survival.
It annoys me greatly. But this is Dakky's default playstyle regardless of alignment.
Actually I am trying to play pro-town now, so killing me could be a good choice, because my shot can hurt the town even more. On N1 I'll have 1:14 chance of hitting mafia and with more town than mafia, chances are for mafia... I actually am writing a list who I consider town and who I consider mafia, so when the time comes, we'll see if my list was correct or it was not.
Is that like a secret Santa's list. talk about odds what is the odds of dakky making it to day 2
dakky and mitch should go on a date, they fit so nicely together
[/spoiler]benga wrote:Dakky is just for now draing attention so he can sum up reactions of others and make his own list.
I didn't take any of this serious.
[/spoiler]benga wrote:TimWoodbury wrote:madmitch wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Streaker. Facts are irrelevant to my case against Mars. I built a nonsensical case against against a player who will give the case the respect it deserves, as he has done.
Mars, the more we discuss Dakky the more he will reveal. There is nothing left for him to say. Dakky isnt going to keep a charade of pretending to be vig whilst sk/mafia going for long, so not important D1. Hence, lets move on.
Then why not unvote him? other votes that make no sense: Tim >Dakky scum in last game .END>PCM his name. Streaker>Virus % read.Benga >Tim being a major?? only one to make sense is Marashu. Benga's post make no sense and has no help to the game. We also badly need to here from PCM and Mets, so I will VOTE METS to see if I can get any reaction out of him.
i do bealive thats why its called JVS (joke vote stage) you place votes that are purley joking or a sarcastic vote you shold know that by now mitch seems odd you think those was legit votes??
wow somebody got it!
if I took any of these for real, then I would be interested in streakerStreaker wrote:Just to be clear, I'm not particularly interested in lynching dakky at this point, more in other's opinions on wether or not to lynch dakky.
Interesting to note, it seems only wing is trying to stop this bleed of rolefishing.
Virus was only interested in the % that dakky used, nothing else.
he even admits he is gathering people for lynch
[/spoiler]benga wrote:madmitch wrote:Nice to hear from you PCM, your post was insightful I also agree with you about Mets post that is why I did not unvote him yet. Dakky is just being Dakky , I played with him in a few games and he can get under your skin , but I also believed he soft claimed by mistake and wants to back paddle and start again.
what's your case on Mets?
unvote
[/quote]virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
[/quote]Streaker wrote:virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
This post gives me a double feeling... I like how you are now pushing your case on Tim, but at the same time you are also saying you are fine with lynching either of the players that got discussion going, but you don't really seem to care which one.
There has been quite a bit of discussion between Tim and endgame, you don't jump in on any of this yet it relates directly to what you are trying to push.
Instead of following up, he decides it's time to start questioning mitch, of all players. It all feels very much like stalling while keeping middle ground not bumping on anyone's toe's.
benga wrote:Streaker wrote:virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
This post gives me a double feeling... I like how you are now pushing your case on Tim, but at the same time you are also saying you are fine with lynching either of the players that got discussion going, but you don't really seem to care which one.
There has been quite a bit of discussion between Tim and endgame, you don't jump in on any of this yet it relates directly to what you are trying to push.Instead of following up, he decides it's time to start questioning mitch, of all players. It all feels very much like stalling while keeping middle ground not bumping on anyone's toe's.
Well isn't this a bit hypocritical, since you call me out for the same thing you are doing here??
Yes, I wanted to hear mitchs thoughts on mets, as I already heard from END and dakky about their claims.
I am not prepared to make case on them or lynch them so I need more info about others.
Especially with ends unpredicatable disasterness, would rather wait for cops investigations.
[/quote]madmitch wrote:@ Mars , I may have went to far on the claim against wcg ,but with the other two no,they both claim they want to be town aligned and can help town but with a cost , be careful of these guys
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:TimWoodbury wrote:
i saw where people was speculating you claimed vig didnt ever see you say till now that you WAS vig so with that im going to unvote
So you were just outright rolefishing then Tim? And how does that help town? This just looks to me like you wanted clarification on who to nightkill.
virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
madmitch wrote:@ WCG it just seems during this game you three are repeatedly accusing each other to the point that it might be a wifom situtation, of course I good be wrong ,so ease my mind because I rather go after Mets again for his lack of posts, no posts since Thursday . I find that scummy also.
[/url]madmitch wrote:=D> well said


TheForgivenOne wrote:Vote Count:
Marashu – Strike Wolf (1)
Dakky – pancakemix (1)
TimWoodbury – virus90, Endgame422, dakky21 (3)
Benga – Marashu (1)
Metsfanmax – hotshot53 (1)
Ptlowe – streaker (1)
Endgame422 – Iron Butterfly (1)
WingCmdr Ginkapo - madmitch (1)
Iron Butterfly - WingCmdr Ginkapo (1)
With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch. Deadline is set for November 15th. If you want/need an extension, please let me know.

Streaker wrote:benga wrote:Streaker wrote:virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
This post gives me a double feeling... I like how you are now pushing your case on Tim, but at the same time you are also saying you are fine with lynching either of the players that got discussion going, but you don't really seem to care which one.
There has been quite a bit of discussion between Tim and endgame, you don't jump in on any of this yet it relates directly to what you are trying to push.Instead of following up, he decides it's time to start questioning mitch, of all players. It all feels very much like stalling while keeping middle ground not bumping on anyone's toe's.
Well isn't this a bit hypocritical, since you call me out for the same thing you are doing here??
Yes, I wanted to hear mitchs thoughts on mets, as I already heard from END and dakky about their claims.
I am not prepared to make case on them or lynch them so I need more info about others.
Especially with ends unpredicatable disasterness, would rather wait for cops investigations.
And what have you done to gather more info? You really want to lynch random (or no lynch) just to play follow-the-cop on D2? What if there is no cop in this game?
Endgame422 wrote:Hotshot,i would like more from him for sure especially regarding wings case on IB.
Endgame422 wrote:Mitch i understand your slip up on dakky,but why was wing your second choice?
Benga looks like town to me here.
Streaker wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Vote Marashu
No-one should enjoy playing mafia, thats not the point. The sooner he is out of the game, the sooner the misery can envelope us all.
He's also gone AWOL since this, despite being perma online over the last few days.
Marashu made this post, just yesterday:
[spoiler]Marashu wrote:dakky21 wrote:Endgame422 wrote:Dakky was scum in 2/3 of the last games that i was involved with but thats not really the point.
Of course its the jokevote stage so im far from certain he is scum but that comment was strange,he seemed to be trying to downplay the scene "subtly" and it seemed like enough reason to give him a push and see how he reacts.
His reaction doesnt really do much for me and id consider him for a claim later but theres lots of time here. Also, I really am beginning to think Streakers IMOs is to point fingers at as many people as possible to get a reaction then yell scum. Wing I feel makes good claims but sticks with Streak sometimes I think because he likes what Streak says.
Sorry was sick over the weekend. Also, I enjoy being challenged to add to the discussion. Funny, how all of the game start at the same time. Alas, I am fairly certain on two separate instances that both Wing and Streak have called people scum for using the previous manouvers.
Streak has called me scum in a game for posting about peoples activity, saying it was just me trying to get focus off myself. Wing has done the same. We aren’t that far into Day 1 were people cannot still come back and be good contributors. I also like how Wing and Streak seem to play right off each other in either game, confuses my reads on them.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:strike wolf wrote:I just read Dakky's post as "what?" It is completely nonsensical.
If were talking about Strike- In an hour he went from the above to the below without any intervention from End or I.strike wolf wrote:virus90 wrote:havent been in most of the games lately, just a few. so why is dakky scum "again" according to you? (end wing?) i dont see it from the post your referring to.
Perhaps I shouldn't answer for end and wing but suggesting a ludicrous theory about an NYC killer which again would be ludicrous, seems like a distraction. It's an impossible theory (as an NPC killer serves no function so even the suggestion of it as unlikely has no real relevance to anything going on in the game. Stating that NPCS were killed by NPcs is also irrelevant and distracting.
Fper by tim. This post also has no real logic behind it.
Thats an extremely quick change of opinion for the fourth/fifth page of a game for someone with no knowledge apart from their own alignment....
ps - Clearly Mets wasnt scummarizing, he was gathering info!