They're not, but in this game it happened to be. Believe it or not.strike wolf wrote:Forgive me if I am wrong but I thought characters were not alignment indicative?
Moderator: Community Team
They're not, but in this game it happened to be. Believe it or not.strike wolf wrote:Forgive me if I am wrong but I thought characters were not alignment indicative?
So you were just outright rolefishing then Tim? And how does that help town? This just looks to me like you wanted clarification on who to nightkill.TimWoodbury wrote:
i saw where people was speculating you claimed vig didnt ever see you say till now that you WAS vig so with that im going to unvote
You are saying that if you claim your character, you are proven town. First, that's not true. As wolf said, characters are not allignment indicative. It could be coincidence that you have a 'good' character and are town, but that's completely random. For instance, if someone claimed 'time', or 'space', how will you determine allignment?dakky21 wrote:They're not, but in this game it happened to be. Believe it or not.strike wolf wrote:Forgive me if I am wrong but I thought characters were not alignment indicative?
benga wrote:dakky is lawys such an easy target, he seems to being able to provoke much interest about his alignment/sex preferences
benga wrote:You have dirty mind, I like it!Streaker wrote:Do you want to lynch him?benga wrote:dakky is lawys such an easy target, he seems to being able to provoke much interest about his alignment/sex preferences
benga wrote:Streaker wrote:Do you want to lynch him?benga wrote:dakky is lawys such an easy target, he seems to being able to provoke much interest about his alignment/sex preferencesSeems like streaker is very interested in lynching dakky. Dakky must feel beloved by the whole bunch!Streaker wrote:Are you serious, or do you consider this a joke vote/post?TimWoodbury wrote:because dakkys ass was skum in the last game so i also agreevote dakky because he must be skum due to ebing skum in last active gamevirus90 wrote:havent been in most of the games lately, just a few. so why is dakky scum "again" according to you? (end wing?) i dont see it from the post your referring to.
benga wrote:dakky and mitch should go on a date, they fit so nicely togethermadmitch wrote:Is that like a secret Santa's list. talk about odds what is the odds of dakky making it to day 2dakky21 wrote:Actually I am trying to play pro-town now, so killing me could be a good choice, because my shot can hurt the town even more. On N1 I'll have 1:14 chance of hitting mafia and with more town than mafia, chances are for mafia... I actually am writing a list who I consider town and who I consider mafia, so when the time comes, we'll see if my list was correct or it was not.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:It annoys me greatly. But this is Dakky's default playstyle regardless of alignment.Endgame422 wrote:dakky21 wrote: 2. You are unconcerned with hurting towns chances if it means your survival.
benga wrote:Dakky is just for now draing attention so he can sum up reactions of others and make his own list.
I didn't take any of this serious.
benga wrote:wow somebody got it!TimWoodbury wrote:i do bealive thats why its called JVS (joke vote stage) you place votes that are purley joking or a sarcastic vote you shold know that by now mitch seems odd you think those was legit votes??madmitch wrote:Then why not unvote him? other votes that make no sense: Tim >Dakky scum in last game .END>PCM his name. Streaker>Virus % read.Benga >Tim being a major?? only one to make sense is Marashu. Benga's post make no sense and has no help to the game. We also badly need to here from PCM and Mets, so I will VOTE METS to see if I can get any reaction out of him.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Streaker. Facts are irrelevant to my case against Mars. I built a nonsensical case against against a player who will give the case the respect it deserves, as he has done.
Mars, the more we discuss Dakky the more he will reveal. There is nothing left for him to say. Dakky isnt going to keep a charade of pretending to be vig whilst sk/mafia going for long, so not important D1. Hence, lets move on.
if I took any of these for real, then I would be interested in streakerhe even admits he is gathering people for lynchStreaker wrote:Just to be clear, I'm not particularly interested in lynching dakky at this point, more in other's opinions on wether or not to lynch dakky.
Interesting to note, it seems only wing is trying to stop this bleed of rolefishing.
Virus was only interested in the % that dakky used, nothing else.
benga wrote:what's your case on Mets?madmitch wrote:Nice to hear from you PCM, your post was insightful I also agree with you about Mets post that is why I did not unvote him yet. Dakky is just being Dakky , I played with him in a few games and he can get under your skin , but I also believed he soft claimed by mistake and wants to back paddle and start again.
unvote
This post gives me a double feeling... I like how you are now pushing your case on Tim, but at the same time you are also saying you are fine with lynching either of the players that got discussion going, but you don't really seem to care which one.virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
Streaker wrote:This post gives me a double feeling... I like how you are now pushing your case on Tim, but at the same time you are also saying you are fine with lynching either of the players that got discussion going, but you don't really seem to care which one.virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
There has been quite a bit of discussion between Tim and endgame, you don't jump in on any of this yet it relates directly to what you are trying to push.
Well isn't this a bit hypocritical, since you call me out for the same thing you are doing here??Instead of following up, he decides it's time to start questioning mitch, of all players. It all feels very much like stalling while keeping middle ground not bumping on anyone's toe's.
And what have you done to gather more info? You really want to lynch random (or no lynch) just to play follow-the-cop on D2? What if there is no cop in this game?benga wrote:Streaker wrote:This post gives me a double feeling... I like how you are now pushing your case on Tim, but at the same time you are also saying you are fine with lynching either of the players that got discussion going, but you don't really seem to care which one.virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
There has been quite a bit of discussion between Tim and endgame, you don't jump in on any of this yet it relates directly to what you are trying to push.Well isn't this a bit hypocritical, since you call me out for the same thing you are doing here??Instead of following up, he decides it's time to start questioning mitch, of all players. It all feels very much like stalling while keeping middle ground not bumping on anyone's toe's.
Yes, I wanted to hear mitchs thoughts on mets, as I already heard from END and dakky about their claims.
I am not prepared to make case on them or lynch them so I need more info about others.
Especially with ends unpredicatable disasterness, would rather wait for cops investigations.
Looking back at the game again there was two killers(masons?) and the trio of Dakky,WCG and Endgame were in the mix of things( like now) End calling Dakky scum and Wing agreeing, so what are we looking at three 3rd parties accusing each other to throw us off, or a couple of masons but who Dakky and End or Dakky and Wing or End and wing ??? Endgames claim seems real, so that would leave Dakky and Wing, but Dakkys soft claim vig seems real also and VIG is usually a town role so I think the best thing to do is put so pressure on WCG UNVOTE VOTE WCGmadmitch wrote:@ Mars , I may have went to far on the claim against wcg ,but with the other two no,they both claim they want to be town aligned and can help town but with a cost , be careful of these guys
no i assumed wwher ehe said he could be lyeing ment he was, he shoulda jsut outright said im town vig instead of the back and forth game of i am im not i am im not oh yah i amWingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:So you were just outright rolefishing then Tim? And how does that help town? This just looks to me like you wanted clarification on who to nightkill.TimWoodbury wrote:
i saw where people was speculating you claimed vig didnt ever see you say till now that you WAS vig so with that im going to unvote
virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
My position is this:madmitch wrote:@ WCG it just seems during this game you three are repeatedly accusing each other to the point that it might be a wifom situtation, of course I good be wrong ,so ease my mind because I rather go after Mets again for his lack of posts, no posts since Thursday . I find that scummy also.
[/url]madmitch wrote:well said
Sorry Wing, that's my error. (Trying to do a vote count when you're tired is a dumb idea. don't try it)TheForgivenOne wrote:Vote Count:
Marashu – Strike Wolf (1)
Dakky – pancakemix (1)
TimWoodbury – virus90, Endgame422, dakky21 (3)
Benga – Marashu (1)
Metsfanmax – hotshot53 (1)
Ptlowe – streaker (1)
Endgame422 – Iron Butterfly (1)
WingCmdr Ginkapo - madmitch (1)
Iron Butterfly - WingCmdr Ginkapo (1)
With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch. Deadline is set for November 15th. If you want/need an extension, please let me know.
well you gave me enough to vote streakerStreaker wrote:And what have you done to gather more info? You really want to lynch random (or no lynch) just to play follow-the-cop on D2? What if there is no cop in this game?benga wrote:Streaker wrote:This post gives me a double feeling... I like how you are now pushing your case on Tim, but at the same time you are also saying you are fine with lynching either of the players that got discussion going, but you don't really seem to care which one.virus90 wrote:im still under the impression tim a viable target for this day, he just does not seem to know where to go. voting and unvoting. not desicive, nothing new. just back and forth a bit. saw that someone came to a similar conclusion and voted him aswell.
on endgame i have not much to add, viable target in case there is no better target really.
and dakky... bit the same, isnt helping but according to the rest thats not much new. since i havent played that much with him
There has been quite a bit of discussion between Tim and endgame, you don't jump in on any of this yet it relates directly to what you are trying to push.Well isn't this a bit hypocritical, since you call me out for the same thing you are doing here??Instead of following up, he decides it's time to start questioning mitch, of all players. It all feels very much like stalling while keeping middle ground not bumping on anyone's toe's.
Yes, I wanted to hear mitchs thoughts on mets, as I already heard from END and dakky about their claims.
I am not prepared to make case on them or lynch them so I need more info about others.
Especially with ends unpredicatable disasterness, would rather wait for cops investigations.
I expected people at some point to make the argument to lynch end that IB did... I didn't expect it in the post right after mine though lol.Endgame422 wrote: Hotshot,i would like more from him for sure especially regarding wings case on IB.
Me and Mitch played few mafia's together.... and he knows what I think... (though I can't read him yet)...Endgame422 wrote:Mitch i understand your slip up on dakky,but why was wing your second choice?
Benga looks like town to me here.
Excellent followup on strike. I didn’t initially get this read but after rereading I thought it is a good read and I liked the logic. Strike has moved up the rankings in my book as potential scum.Streaker wrote:Marashu made this post, just yesterday:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:He's also gone AWOL since this, despite being perma online over the last few days.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Vote Marashu
No-one should enjoy playing mafia, thats not the point. The sooner he is out of the game, the sooner the misery can envelope us all.
Spoiler
Marashu wrote:dakky21 wrote:Sorry was sick over the weekend. Also, I enjoy being challenged to add to the discussion. Funny, how all of the game start at the same time. Alas, I am fairly certain on two separate instances that both Wing and Streak have called people scum for using the previous manouvers.Endgame422 wrote:Dakky was scum in 2/3 of the last games that i was involved with but thats not really the point.
Of course its the jokevote stage so im far from certain he is scum but that comment was strange,he seemed to be trying to downplay the scene "subtly" and it seemed like enough reason to give him a push and see how he reacts.
His reaction doesnt really do much for me and id consider him for a claim later but theres lots of time here. Also, I really am beginning to think Streakers IMOs is to point fingers at as many people as possible to get a reaction then yell scum. Wing I feel makes good claims but sticks with Streak sometimes I think because he likes what Streak says.
Streak has called me scum in a game for posting about peoples activity, saying it was just me trying to get focus off myself. Wing has done the same. We aren’t that far into Day 1 were people cannot still come back and be good contributors. I also like how Wing and Streak seem to play right off each other in either game, confuses my reads on them.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:If were talking about Strike- In an hour he went from the above to the below without any intervention from End or I.strike wolf wrote:I just read Dakky's post as "what?" It is completely nonsensical.
Thats an extremely quick change of opinion for the fourth/fifth page of a game for someone with no knowledge apart from their own alignment....strike wolf wrote:Perhaps I shouldn't answer for end and wing but suggesting a ludicrous theory about an NYC killer which again would be ludicrous, seems like a distraction. It's an impossible theory (as an NPC killer serves no function so even the suggestion of it as unlikely has no real relevance to anything going on in the game. Stating that NPCS were killed by NPcs is also irrelevant and distracting.virus90 wrote:havent been in most of the games lately, just a few. so why is dakky scum "again" according to you? (end wing?) i dont see it from the post your referring to.
Fper by tim. This post also has no real logic behind it.
ps - Clearly Mets wasnt scummarizing, he was gathering info!