Moderator: Community Team
Actually you are the only one who voted for both. Not counting PIX ofcourse, who was killed. When does "voting along with the others" become not enough?the white rose wrote:well thats silly, i was not the only one to vote these 2, they appeared scummy so i voted along with others.
Your fixation on me is making me think that maybe wing was right.....my best bet now is tim and pt/soldier....but i am not confident enough to lead a charge against them just yet, think i need to reread again!
I don't recall streaker or wing making a push to lynch you. They accused you of being scummy yes, but they conceded that there should be evidence of a bad investigation before you could be lynched. If you are in fact scum, this is incredibly handicapping the town, since now we are searching for (assuming 3 total) just one scum instead of two. It's also possible that if this is the case, then the other scum is hiding in hotshot or soldier. This would create a scenario where everyone talking is either town or "confirmed" town. You are free to scum hunt without fear of being wrong (other than we are running out of chances) but you were in fact imperative in the lynching of both streaker and wing. They did each make a mistake, (streaker unvoting dakky, wing hammering streaker) but the point you have chosen to bring up for their lynching is that they looked at you.the white rose wrote:perhaps...but i had good reason to vote for them both.
I am sure scum would love you all to lynch me today, but hold off you will look very silly after i was cleared by the cop.
For that to be wrong there must be a bus driver, if you think i am scum, then lets find the bus driver then you can lynch me.
I doubt very much there is a bus driver and there is not much point in having a cop if you don't believe him.
its gonna get to the stage that i dare not scum hunt cos if i am wrong i get lynched.
I may be all that town has left now, if we mislynch today then tomorrow will be lylo, and we still have 2 to find.
PT, the reason wing and streaker both got lynched is cos they tried to lynch the only confirmed town role, that was too scummy to be town...
GodfatherStreaker wrote:Peculiar, because at the time of your post there was only 1 vote on Dakky... by Mitch if I recall. You must mean the joke votes on dakky PRIOR to game start. Dakky made a single response to that:the white rose wrote:the theory was to do with dakky, based on him getting very nervous early on when he attracted 4 joke votes....left me wondering about him.....and based on that looked at the way others interacted with him....that ultimately led to me switching my vote to dakky making him l-1. from there i looked to see who was trying to save him.....my theory has worked well so far even though it now seems to have fallen on deaf ears.
I have worked hard to analyse postings made.....my previous post summarizes my findings, they may or may not be supported but there they are unless and until someone else convinces me otherwise, either through persuasion or making the same sort of mistake that you made.
After this the day started, votes are reset, and it's not mentioned again. Surely if you were really looking at dakky, you would have followed that post up with a case on him. But you didn't, you directed your attention to mitch mostly and only at the very end of the wagon do something with dakky. And you almost instantly unvoted him, too.dakky21 wrote:Agreed, though it never happened to me that during joke stage I get four consecutive joke votesWhatsausage wrote:A little defensive there dakky, I'd say there are more joke votes on you than normal, but it is incredibly early to be nervous about it.dakky21 wrote:Exactly, voting me while the game didn't even start isn't really fair.
I'm calling it right now, white rose mafia godfather.
Let's pressure cyaniteer into a claim first, or alternatively have him replaced in the game, and then push towards a white rose lynch.
fp'd by wing. Let's hear your thoughts on my reasoning here, wing.
I put soldier l-1 and twr unvotes....then he kills wing...the white rose wrote:unvote
this was where i was confirmed as doublevoter, cyan at the time was on l-1 with everyone who lynched dakky on him except me, had the double voter been on him, he would have been lynched....dakky was lynched with a double voter on him, so it follows that the double voter had to be me.....elementary my dear pt.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose are you the doublevoter? If not Cyan has just been lynched.
Congratulations guys, how about you actually ask questions next time. Lynching someone without attempting to gain evidence is the stupidest thing you can do.
33% of Sausage's case is that I haven't been pressured before. The main reason being that most have found me towny (or more scummy players were available). The next 33% of the case if that Wing screamed my name when we dragged him to the hangman's noose. While it is always wise to look at the wrongfully strung up, one should also regard the context. I carried the case from the get-go of D3. I didn't sneak in last second because I'm scum knowing who's town. I made a (to me anyway) convincing case that several people felt was strong enough to lynch wing.Whatsausage wrote:I have pasted the final VC's of each day above and replaced the replaced player's names and colored the names of the deceased. I don't know how much can really be gleaned from this, but if I run scenarios on what I would expect from "typical" VC scum placement, I think it reflects poorly on Tim and ragian. They both joined the dakky vote once time was running down and it became likely that dakky would be the lynch- a "safe" place to hide/distance oneself. On D2, the two remaining scum would likely want to distance themselves from each other, as can be seen in ragian voting tim. Tim's vote is more likely just omgus here. Then on D3, I would expect a scum to come right out and chase wing for hammering town. Tim comes straight out voting wing. He then changes his vote after ragian votes wing in his first (real) post of the day. Is this logic going off the deep end? I could see scum spending the whole game trying to separate from each other, and that is what these two have done.
Perhaps I am viewing the above logic with tinted glasses or overthinking it, but I believe these patterns are consistent, and this along with wing's calling ragian out before death makes these our two scum. Ragian hasn't really been pushed yet, so I will Vote Ragian, but I would also be happy to lynch Tim first if that's what everyone would prefer.
While I didn't throw my vote after him immediately, I still put on record that he acted scummily. Your statement about me not pointing to dakky until it was too late is untrue. Especially if you factor in the fact that I wanted to go for a non-contributor which several people agreed was a decent idea, but then returned to where we had seen a scummy move.Iron Butterfly wrote:Pretty much crapola to go with on day one.Iron Butterfly wrote:And yet you vote White Rose. Why are you following someones lead and voting when out of your own mouth you say Mitch is scummy?dakky21 wrote:This game looks like no one is going to make a case, except maybe kratos on White Rose, but I'm going to follow his lead FOR now and
vote rose
Also, mitch looks scummy, and not because I always vote him, for real, his posts this game are scummy.
vote dakky
This was never addressed by Dakky and went pretty much ignored. I find it odd that several folks mention it and find it odd then people start obsessing about stupid crap.
Raigan and Streaker were like yup its scummy...yest several others dont even make mention.
Dakky never addressed it either.

This is a good point about TWR. Can't believe I never thought of that...TimWoodbury wrote:iim interested in ragian i forgot bout twr being the doublevote i cant imagine there would be a double vote godfarther so lets jsut call him confirmed town for now and move past twr

not sticking up for ragian here, but actually you are wrong, he was not on streaker on day 2, he was on you, that made you and streaker taking into account my double vote, both at l-1, you got lynched cos wing switched his voteTimWoodbury wrote:because it would be l-2 id really hate to have you lynched before being able to talk some. biggest thing is you so far was on all 3 lynches could be coincediance and im assumeing your a smarrt guy and a smart guy would know not to bring attention to themselves(yah its some wifom here i know)
We must get mafia today. If we don't it will be 3v2 tomorrow with next kill being do or die. I'm willing to go after soldier today. I don't see him adding up as town play. Not a lot either way going on with that play but cyan play was definitely weird at best. I think that's our best bet today.the white rose wrote:hmm, no new posts today, thats disappointing, my double vote is weighing heavily on my mind, and i really do not know who to vote for.
My thoughts are on Tim, but only because wing and streaker saw him as scummy, PT, an experienced player not really helping to find scum and staying in the background....soldier both he and his predecessor have looked scummy and cyan even refused to claim at l-1, when i had a chance to lynch him....beginning to wonder now whether i should have.
Sausage seems more town to me, has been very helpful, ragian has played on looking town for pressurising dakky on D1 but not convinced he is....and that leaves hotshot who has stayed under the radar for the most part, is that scummy? i really do not know, think i am at a big disadvantage in that i have not played with anyone of you before so cannot compare your game play.
I dare not vote unless i am prepared to see someone get lynched, if my vote is wrong, scum could easily quick hammer and i will look even more suspicious.