Whatsausage case....
Early game, doesn't really talk about any players
Whatsausage wrote:Alright it's still early, so I don't have much for reads.
Storr is acting about how I normally expect, not sure how alignment indicative that is though, so I'll say slightly town
In a game this size, it is so incredibly easy for players to slide way under the radar.
I've seen this instituted in other large games, where each player has someone to keep track of to try and keep activity up. The easiest way seems to be the player below you on the signup list. For example, falko is below me, and he is yet to post after his confirmation post.
@Falko, care to join us?
While his suggestion of keeping track of people is nice, he isn't acking Falko to join in on anything in particular, just an activity nudge.
Whatsausage wrote:/ wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:I win as long as he is dead by endgame, weather I die or not.
Iron Butterfly wrote:I am Town. He is a survivor.
Umm... in what world has this ever been the definition of town?

Thank you /, I had the exact same thought reading that. Also confusing: he stated after hotshot's "claim" that he was 100% sure that hotshot had to survive until the end of the game and calls him a survivor. He then says that he forgot to add that he doesn't think hotshot is a survivor

Interested in playing both sides of IB vs Hotshot. He is currently voting hotshot, because
I don't think we will get anything better than IB's claim to go on today. I will unvote vote hotshot.
While i "agree" with the sentiment, overall it seems like the easy way out. He isn't interested in generating something else, he isn't interested in finding mafia. To me it appears to be faking involvement.
Whatsausage wrote:the white rose wrote:I am a little pissed as to why pt is suggesting that i may be scum simply cos i have not posted as much in this game as i did in my first game.
Even though i am posting much more than most.
there are many who have posted very little if anything at all. I would wager that that is where we will find scum lurking.
as for the ib v hotshot saga, i am surprised at the weak defence from hotshot. Something here just does not sit right with me. what chance has hotshot been given at winning? if he is survivor and ib's role is to lynch him.
Could ib be scum? surely if he were he would have settled into the background and not fake claimed at the start of day 1.
Could hotshot be scum and could ib know that? would seem awfully unfair on hotshot if that were the case.
all we are told by ib is that hotshot will be harmful to town.....how would he know that? he will not say.
I think what we have to decide is do we believe hotshot's claim of survivor?
If he were a danger to town, surely he would have claimed something much more useful to town? such as doctor or tracker....had he have claimed that would we still be lynching him? i would say we would not take the risk of possibly lynching a town tracker.....so if he is fake claiming why not claim a town pr and survive? thats what i would do.
therefore i am inclined to believe hotshot's claim.
so it follows that i do not believe he is a danger to town, therefore i cannot believe ib.
I may be wrong but for now i would prefer to lynch someone who is sitting quietly in the background. I don't care who, its a potshot, but i think by doing that we are much more likely to lynch a scum. lynching hotshot now would be the same as voting nolynch, who cares whether a 3p survivor survives or not? lets not waste our chance of finding scum.
unvote
It seems like every post you make, you make a stronger statement about how you are posting. Yes you have posted a number of times, but almost all the meat is after pt called you out. Before that you were doing alright in a numerical sense, but the posts were low on substance, and not making a lasting impact (particularly to pt it appears). The point I'm trying to make is, why be pissed at pt, when that suggestion was at a point where you made less of an impression than you did in a game he played with you in which you were town? No one is hard-calling you
scum, pt just suggested that your impact was more like games in which you have been
scum than like games in which you have been town. (I have only been in one game with you, so I can't really comment on your meta, but I can agree with pt that at the point in which he made that statement, you weren't making much by way of an impression.)
If you feel strongly that someone posting less is
scum, pick one and press the issue. I have seen a few say that time is too low to look anywhere new; there are 8 days left, that is longer than many days in their entirety.
The way I see it, either IB or hotshot is misleading us (or both). If you believe hotshot is just a vanilla survivor, then you should vote for IB. If you don't, then you should vote for hotshot, as he is either a liar or a threat to town.
I agree that it doesn't seem right that hotshot would just be given up as a survivor like that, but I also agree that IB likely wouldn't come out like this if he didn't know it to be true. (This isn't to say that makes him pro-town.) I think given these two things, hotshot is a better lynch. I don't think he would claim some town PR like you suggest, as then he would have to fabricate actions and justification every day, while running the risk of being NK'ed. A survivor would want to seem like they aren't a threat to anyone.
If you think that IB is lying, I don't really understand why you aren't voting for him. There are plenty of ways he could be
scum. The way I see it, at least one of IB and hotshot is anti-town, and I think that 50-50 odds are much better than your potshot.
@IB, when did you receive this information about hotshot? With your role, or at the end of N0?
I wanted to highlight his usuage of the word scum. This is the first post he has used the word (which in large part has to do with someone else talking about scummy actions). Yet, he isn't really show casing actual interests. He is just interested in pointing TWR in a path to take. TWR is reacting to pressure from PT, yet whatsausage takes not interest in developing this comment, only to say he is neutral. Again this whole post, is just a "hey you could do this or that" while not giving away what his motivations might be.
Whatsausage wrote:Interesting that there was only one death, perhaps there is some validity to there being some insane characters that will come into play soon.
Vote benga, for skimming, and then for trying to vote someone for calling him on it. Weak. Not that pt is totally guilt free of what he called you out for (his post looked like it in included skimming as well), but if you truly think he is scum for it, then you must be extra scum.
His first accusation of someone, on day 2. A little comment about the death, and right into benga. I had to reread this area, because i can't be sure what he is talking about. It wasn't even on the same page.
[spoiler]
benga wrote:ptlowe wrote:benga wrote:Aladin man, is your mispelling mandatory?
This is the kind of crap posts that make me think people are scum....you obviously dont give a shit enough to read through the thread. Why are you playing????
On another note, this back and forth on IB is driving me nuts. Either vote the man on day 2 or start actually scum hunting. YOU HAVE BEATEN THE DEAD HORSE, screwed its corpse, then beat it again, then cut off its stick, and stuck its stick in your mums. Thats what I think.
OBVIOUS reads....ALLLLLLADDDDDIn, appears to be real scummy or just soo new he doesnt know his arm from his butt. BTW your worse than Tim.
TWR, scatting through with mistakes. Win condition wrong, overall defensive ect.
Mets not adding to the conversation but furthering the confusion. Which is not typical for him.
SAVE US WING.....I just read three full pages of crap posts. Oh and Virus please be more active. Your one off posts without reading anoy me.
vote pt for his crap post
he isn't adding anything useful and he calls out others
[/spoiler]
This contains benga's reaction to ptlowe. Whatsausages reaction really seems just weak. I mean, really thats it? Whats more funny, is the direction whatsausage goes after this.
Whatsausage wrote:ptlowe wrote:Well I can vet Stor's claim on being town because I investigated him last night. BTW since let's kill mafia and win and people are saying its a good idea. I am town cop. Let the claiming begin.
Expect protecting tonight.
I agree with wing, this claim doesn't say much of anything at all. For many reasons.
1. Often times, cop checks will only search for mafia or non-mafia. A "town" result could easily be a third party, especially considering how it appears that an asylum could factor in to the setup.
2. A cop already flipped, (albeit insane) and I would argue that it's possible he was the only "cop" in the game, because he surely wasn't told he was insane. If you had claimed and he was still alive, would we be seeing a situation where an attempted counterclaim where both players are telling the truth as they know it? I don't buy it.
3. In a game this size, cop is an easy scum claim, especially early.
Also, I promised myself (I don't know if I actually posted it in any other games) I would lynch an early unprovoked claim like this. Especially one that doesn't benefit town. Your claim is premature at best.
Unvote vote ptloweFP'd 3x
So you are trying to direct protection roles?
No, don't claim away. In my opinion, a massclaim at this point is unfeasible. There are 26(!) players left. Are we going to just lynch anyone that doesn't claim? How do we pick if there are multiple? What benefit does it truly serve?
Forgets about benga, goes back to dealing with ptlowe. Whats the purpose of voting ptlowe? Its "policy" and he says it so. It isn't because he thinks ptlowe is mafia, but because "if someone does this im going to vote them" He isn't looking at the situation. I can't see what ptlowe did as mafia. Its bad play yes. ANd its easy lynch bait.
I'm sorry if my previous post was unclear, I did just mean that I agree with you in that the claim was dumb. The other thoughts are my own. I'm not certain that pt is scum, (though I'm definitely not ruling it out) but I do believe that his claim hurts town. I will admit, a main reason for my vote is policy.
So the question is, after a decent amount of time. What has whatsausage done for contributions to the game? He didn't take a stance on IB vs Hotshot, clearly leaving himself open for either option. Up to this point on day 2, he has jumped on an easy case, blown it off, jumped on an early cop claim over policy. How many people has he read town? How many scum? Few and far between, yet how many people has he given "maybe town maybe scum" ? Several at this point.
His latter posts (to include his claim) Are filled with "options" And no direction of choice.
Storr asked why I thought I may be NK'd. Well that is because that even if I am able to convince the town that I am not the best lynch, I wouldn't be surprised to see a vigilante be a vigilante and take what they believe to be justice into their own hands. Scum also know that I am a PR that isn't on their side, so they may just kill me themselves.
Whatsausage wrote:I like the way 3 of my 5 votes so far are from the players I have questioned in this game (benga, twr, pt)
So keep that in mind if I am lynched or NK'd.
fp'd by rishaed
Just speculation, but could make sense
Any other thoughts beyond just throwing speculation out?
These posts don't really match... He talks about being lynched or night killed, but in regards to asking why i thought he would die in the night. He makes the comment before he claims. Everyone has some sort of role to my understanding, so it seems silly to make the comment "mafia would kill me cause they know i'm a pr" yet they don't know what you are at the time of your claim, you are under pressure. He also brings up being vig shot.
ANd for his lasts posts, again he is leaning on killing madmitch who might be jester, and its ok to let him win. he has become disinterested in applying pressure to anyone he thinks is scum, or telling people who he finds town. He asks about if he has been that scummy, yet all i see is someone who is trying to stay away from giving actual input.
What do i want form whatsausage at this point? I want him to give more input on players, taking a stance on them. I dont' want him talking about madmitch, or other claims. I want to know who he finds scummy, and who he believes to be town.